Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Revisionsmöglichkeiten nach Kanaloplastik

Revision procedures after canaloplasty

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Ophthalmologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die Kanaloplastik ist ein nicht penetrierendes Glaukomoperationsverfahren, das den natürlichen Abflussweg des Kammerwassers durch den Schlemm-Kanal und die Kollektorkanäle wiederherzustellen versucht. Wie alle Glaukomeingriffe bietet auch die Kanaloplastik keinen 100%igen Erfolg. Es existiert aber eine Reihe von Revisionsmöglichkeiten, die den intraokularen Druck nach einer Kanaloplastik senken können. Im vorliegenden Beitrag werden diese dargestellt.

Abstract

Canaloplasty is a recently introduced non-penetrating surgical technique for glaucoma, which seeks to improve the natural outflow of aqueous humor through Schlemm’s canal and the collector channels. Just as in all forms of glaucoma surgery there are a certain number of failures of the procedure and further surgery is often needed to reduce the intraocular pressure in these cases. This article describes some of the revision procedures after canaloplasty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2

Literatur

  1. Awai-Kasaoka N, Inoue T, Inatani M et al (2013) Prognostic factors in trabeculectomy with mitomycin C having history of previous glaucoma surgery. Jpn J Ophthalmol 57:514–519

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ayyala RS, Chaudhry AL, Okogbaa CB et al (2011) Comparison of surgical outcomes between canaloplasty and trabeculectomy at 12 months’ follow-up. Ophthalmology 118:2427–2433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Broadway DC, Chang LP (2001) Trabeculectomy, risk factors for failure and the preoperative state of the conjunctiva. J Glaucoma 10:237–249

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brusini P (2014) Canaloplasty in open-angle glaucoma surgery: a four-year follow-up. Sci World J 2014:469609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bull H, Von Wolff K, Körber N et al (2011) Three-year canaloplasty outcomes for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma: European study results. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 249:1537–1545

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Elbably A, Mousa A, Osman EA (2013) Selective laser trabeculoplasty after canaloplasty improves the efficacy of intraocular pressure reduction in eyes with open angle glaucoma. Saudi Med J 34:544–546

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gesser C, Klemm M (2014) Nachbehandlung nach nicht penetrierender Glaukomchirurgie: die Goniopunktion. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 231:631–635

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Grieshaber MC, Fraenkl S, Schoetzau A et al (2011) Circumferential viscocanalostomy and suture canal distension (canaloplasty) for whites with open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma 20:298–302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Grieshaber MC, Pienaar A, Olivier J et al (2010) Canaloplasty for primary open-angle glaucoma: long-term outcome. Br J Ophthalmol 94:1478–1482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lewis RA, Von Wolff K, Tetz M et al (2011) Canaloplasty: Three-year results of circumferential viscodilation and tensioning of Schlemm canal using a microcatheter to treat open-angle glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:682–690

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mansouri K, Mariani A, Ravinet E (2011) Reconditioning of the trabeculo-descemet’s membrane with the 532-nm Nd : YAG (SLT) laser after deep sclerectomy. Eye 25:1655–1657

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Mastropasqua L, Agnifili L, Salvetat ML et al (2012) In vivo analysis of conjunctiva in canaloplasty for glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 96:634–639

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Matlach J, Dhillon C, Hain J et al (2015) Trabeculectomy versus canaloplasty (TVC study) in the treatment of patients with open-angle glaucoma: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Acta Ophthalmol 93:753–761

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Matlach J, Freiberg FJ, Leippi S et al (2013) Comparison of phacotrabeculectomy versus phacocanaloplasty in the treatment of patients with concomitant cataract and glaucoma. BMC Ophthalmol 13:1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Matthaei M, Steinberg J, Wiermann A et al (2011) Kanaloplastik : Eine neue Alternative in der nicht penetrierenden Glaukomchirurgie. Ophthalmologe 108:637–643

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Seuthe AM, Januschowski K, Szurman P (2015) Micro-invasive 360-degree suture trabeculotomy after successful canaloplasty – one year results. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 254(1):155–159. doi:10.1007/s00417-015-3192-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sugimoto Y, Mochizuki H, Ohkubo S et al (2015) Intraocular pressure outcomes and risk factors for failure in the collaborative bleb-related infection incidence and treatment study. Ophthalmology 122:2223–2233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tam DY, Barnebey HS, Ahmed II (2013) Nd:YAG laser goniopuncture: indications and procedure. J Glaucoma 22:620–625

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tetz M, Koerber N, Shingleton BJ et al (2015) Phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation before, during, or after canaloplasty in eyes with open-angle glaucoma: 3‑year results. J Glaucoma 24:187–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Voykov B, Blumenstock G, Leitritz MA et al (2015) Treatment efficacy and safety of canaloplasty for open-angle glaucoma after 5 years. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 43:768–771

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Voykov B, Szurman P, Dimopoulos S et al (2015) Micro-invasive suture trabeculotomy after canaloplasty: preliminary results. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 43:409–414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universitäts-Augenklinik Tübingen, Schleichstr. 12–16, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland

    B. Voykov & J. M. Rohrbach

Authors
  1. B. Voykov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. M. Rohrbach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Voykov.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

B. Voykov und J.M. Rohrbach geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine von den Autoren durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Voykov, B., Rohrbach, J.M. Revisionsmöglichkeiten nach Kanaloplastik. Ophthalmologe 113, 910–913 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-016-0314-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-016-0314-9

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Search

Navigation