Skip to main content
Log in

Irisnahtfixierte Hinterkammerlinse

Neue Perspektiven für eine bekannte Technik

Iris suture fixation of posterior chamber lenses

New perspectives for an old technique

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Ophthalmologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Strategien zum primären oder sekundären Aphakieausgleich umfassen Vorderkammerlinsenimplantationen, die Fixation einer Iris-Clip-Linse mittels Enklavation und nahtfixierter Hinterkammerlinse transskleral oder an der Iris.

Ziel der Arbeit

Indikation und Kontraindikation zur Irisnahtfixation, Darstellung der operativen Technik, Komplikationen, Ergebnisse, Vergleich mit alternativen Techniken.

Material und Methoden

Basierend auf einer selektiven Literaturrecherche in PubMed Analyse, Zusammenfassung und Diskussion von Originalarbeiten und Reviews.

Ergebnisse

Aktuelle operative Techniken haben der Irisnahtfixation mit guten anatomischen und funktionellen Ergebnissen neue Impulse gegeben und sie zu einer vielversprechenden Alternative werden lassen. Weitere Indikationen sind die minimal-invasive Reposition dezentrierter Intraokularlinsen (IOL) und die Refixation eines dislozierten Kapselsack-IOL-Komplexes („late-in-the-bag“), einer Spätkomplikation der Kataraktchirurgie mit zunehmender Inzidenz.

Schlussfolgerungen

Eine abschließende Bewertung bezüglich der Überlegenheit einer Methode ist nicht möglich. Jede Technik bietet Vorteile als auch potenzielle Komplikationen. Prospektive, randomisierte Studien zur Bestimmung der Sicherheit und Effektivität der verschiedenen Rehabilitationsmöglichkeiten sind notwendig.

Abstract

Background

Intraocular approaches to correct aphakia in cases of inadequate capsular support include an anterior chamber intraocular lens, fixation of a posterior chamber lens to the sclera or iris by suturing or iris claw, respectively.

Objectives

This article reviews the indications and contraindications for iris fixation with sutures and gives an overview of surgical techniques, potential complications and outcomes.

Methods

Based on a selective search of pertinent literature in PubMed the information from original articles and reviews are analyzed, summarized and discussed.

Results

New surgical techniques have imparted an impetus to iris suture fixation with encouraging functional and morphological results offering a new promising alternative to the established options. Improved aspects arise for repositioning of a decentered intraocular lens and for a minimally invasive method for repair of late in-the-bag lens dislocation as seen more frequently by cataract surgeons.

Conclusion

A final evaluation of the proposed techniques is not possible because none has clearly emerged as the optimal method. Precise determination of small differences in visual outcome or complication rates requires a large prospective, randomized clinical trial.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3

Literatur

  1. Apple DJ, Price FW, Gwin T et al (1989) Sutured retropupillary posterior chamber intraocular lenses for exchange of secondary implantation. Ophthalmology 96:1241–1247

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chan CC, Crandall AS, Ahmed IIK (2006) Ab externo sclera suture loop fixation for posterior chamber intraocular lens decentration. J Cataract Refract Surg 32:121–128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chang DF, Masket S, Miller KM et al (2009) Complications of sulcus placement of single-piece acrylic intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:1445–1458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chang DF (2004) Siepser slipknot for McCannel iris-suture fixation of subluxated lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 30:1170–1176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Condon GP, Masket S, Kranemann C et al (2007) Small incision iris fixation of foldable intraocular lenses in the absence of capsule support. Ophthalmology 114:1311–1318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Condon GP (2003) Simplified small-incision peripheral iris fixation of an AcrySof intraocular lens in the absence of capsule report. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:1663–1667

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. DeSilva SR, Arun K, Maghizh A et al (2012) Iris-claw intraocular lenses to correct aphakia in the absence of capsule support. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:1667–1672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gimbel HV, Condon GP, Kohnen T et al (2005) Late in-the-bag intraocular lens dislocation: incidence, prevention, and management. J Cataract Refract Surg 31:2193–2204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Johnston RL, Taylor H, Smith R, Sparrow JM (2010) The Cataract National Dataset electronic multi-centre audit of 55 567 operations: variation in posterior capsule rupture rates between surgeons. Eye 24:888–893

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jongebloed WL, Worst JFG (1986) Degradation of polypropylene in the human eye: a SEM-study. Doc Ophthalmol 64:143–152

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaiura TL, Seedor JA, Koplin RS et al (2005) Complications arising from iris-fixated posterior chamber intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 31:2420–2422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kopel AC, Carvounis PE, Hamill MB et al (2008) Iris-sutured intraocular lenses for ectopia lentis in children. J Cataract Refract Surg 34:596–600

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lin AA, Buckley EG (2010) Update on pediatric cataract surgery and intraocular lens implantation. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 21:55–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McCannel MA (1976) A retrievable suture idea for anterior uveal problems. Ophthalmic Surg 7:98–103

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Michaeli A, Soiberman U, Loewenstein A (2012) Outcome of iris fixation of subluxated intraocular lenses. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 250:1327–1332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mönestam E (2009) Incidence of dislocation of intraocular lenses and pseudophacodonesis 10 years after cataract surgery. Ophthalmology 116:2315–2320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mowbray SL, Chang SH, Casella JF (1983) Estimation of the useful lifetime of polypropylene fiber in the anterior chamber. J Am Intraocul Implant Soc 9:143–147

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mura JJ, Pavlin JP, Condon GP et al (2010) Ultrasound biomicroscopic analysis of iris-sutured foldable posterior chamber lenses. Am J Ophthalmol 149:245–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Navia-Aray EA (1994) Suturing a posterior chamber intraocular lens to the iris through limbal incisions: results in 30 eyes. J Refract Corneal Surg 10:565–570

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Parker SD, Price FW Jr (2003) Suture fixation of a posterior chamber intraocular lens in anticoagulated patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:949–954

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Price FW Jr, Whitson WE (1989) Visual results of suture-fixated posterior chamber lenses during penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 96:1234–1239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rutar T, Hwang DG, Stamper RL (2007) Acute angle-closure glaucoma due to iris transfixation of a subluxated posterior chamber intraocular lens-capsular bag complex. J Cataract Refract Surg 33:1662–1663

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Schein OD, Kenyon KR, Steinert RF et al (1993) A randomized trial of intraocular lens fixation techniques with penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 100:1437–1443

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Scott IU, Flynn HW, Feuer W (1995) Endophthalmitis after secondary lens implantation. A case-report study. Ophthalmology 102:1925–1931

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Stutzman RD, Stark WJ (2003) Surgical technique for suture fixation of an acrylic intraocular lens in the absence of capsule support. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:1658–1662

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wagoner MD, Cox TA, Ariyasu RG et al (2003) Intraocular lens implantation in the absence of capsular support; a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology (Ophthalmic Technology Assessment). Ophthalmology 110:840–859

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang L, Koch DD (2005) Effect of decentration of wavefront-corrected intraocular lenses on the higher-order aberrations of the eye. Arch Ophthalmol 123:1226–1230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yen KG, Reddy AK, Weikert MP et al (2009) Iris-fixated posterior chamber lenses. Am J Ophthalmol 147:121–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Zeh GW, Price FW Jr (2000) Iris fixation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 26:1028–1034

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Einhaltung ethischer Richtlinien

Interessenkonflikt. K. Gerstmeyer und W. Sekundo geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht. Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Gerstmeyer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gerstmeyer, K., Sekundo, W. Irisnahtfixierte Hinterkammerlinse. Ophthalmologe 111, 210–216 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-013-2849-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-013-2849-3

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation