Skip to main content
Log in

Katarakt-Operationsergebnisse durch temporale Kleinschnitttechniken mit und ohne Phakoemulsifikation

Ergebnisse einer prospektiven Studie aus Kenia

Cataract surgery outcomes by temporal small incision techniques with and without phacoemulsification

Results of a prospective study from Kenya

  • Originalien
  • Published:
Der Ophthalmologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Die Ergebnisse der Kataraktchirurgie in vielen Gegenden Afrikas entsprechen bislang nicht den ehrgeizigen Zielsetzungen der WHO. Die superiore nahtlose Kernexpression (SICS) ist die Operation der Wahl in vielen Entwicklungsländern. Diese führt jedoch häufig zu einer deutlichen Zunahme des Hornhautastigmatismus. Eine Möglichkeit zur Verbesserung der Operationsergebnisse liegt in der Anwendung von temporalen Kleinschnitttechniken mit oder ohne Phakoemulsifikation (Phako).

Methoden

Es wurde eine retrospektive, nicht randomisierte Studie an einer Klinik im Südosten Kenias durchgeführt: 405 Augen wurden entweder mit temporaler Phako (n = 288) oder temporaler SICS (n = 117) mit Implantation einer starren PMMA-Linse operiert. Die zu bestimmenden Variablen waren: präoperativer Astigmatismus, operativ induzierter Astigmatismus, Visusergebnisse und Komplikationsrate.

Ergebnisse

Präoperativ betrug der mittlere Astigmatismus in allen Augen 1,1 dpt (Spanne von 0–6,28 dpt). Gegen-die-Regel-Astigmatismus (GdR; Mittelwert: 1,18 dpt) war mit 60,4% am häufigsten. Acht Wochen nach der Operation betrug der chirurgisch induzierte Astigmatismus 1,13 dpt (SD: 0,63) bei 92° für Phako und 1,11 dpt (SD: 0,56) bei 102° für SICS; 89,6% der Augen erreichten einen bestkorrigierten Visus von 0,3 oder besser (hiervon erreichten 82,7% diesen Visus auch unkorrigiert). Der Hauptgrund für einen postoperativ weiterhin reduzierten Visus waren okuläre Begleiterkrankungen.

Fazit

In diesem Studienkollektiv hatten die meisten Patienten einen präoperativen GdR-Astigmatismus, und ein routinemäßiger bzw. vorzugsweiser Wechsel auf temporale Inzisionen erscheint vorteilhaft. Die WHO empfiehlt, dass nach erfolgter Kataraktoperation nicht mehr als 10–20% der Augen einen Visus von weniger als 0,3 haben sollten. Diese Vorgabe wurde im Rahmen dieser Studie mit den vorgestellten Techniken erreicht.

Abstract

Background

The present outcomes of cataract surgery in Africa do not meet the recommendations of the World Health Organization. Superior manual small incision cataract surgery (SICS) is the operation of choice in many developing countries. However, there is good evidence that temporal incisions are more stable and cause less surgically induced astigmatism (SIA).

Methods

In a prospective, non-randomized study in an anterior segment clinic in the southeastern part of Kenya, 405 eyes were operated on using either temporal phacoemulsification (n = 288) or temporal SICS (n = 117) with implantation of a rigid intraocular lens (IOL). The main outcome variables were preexisting corneal astigmatism, SIA, visual outcomes and complication rates.

Results

Preoperatively, the mean astigmatism in all eyes was 1.1 diopters (D) ranging from 0 to 6.28 D. Against-the-rule astigmatism (ATR) (mean 1.18 D) was most common with 60.4%. After 8 weeks following surgery the mean SIA was 1.13 D (SD ±0.63 D) at 92° for phacoemulsification and 1.11 D (SD ±0.56 D) at 102° for SICS. Of the eyes 89.6% reached a best corrected visual acuity (BCVA)  ≥ 0.3 and 82.7% reached this visual acuity also uncorrected. The main reasons for not reaching BCVA ≥ 0.3 were ocular comorbidities.

Conclusions

In the population studied most patients had preexisting ATR astigmatism and a switch to routine temporal incisions appeared beneficial. The World Health Organization recommends that poor (BCVA below 0.1) or borderline (BCVA below 0.3) outcomes after cataract surgery should not be more than 10–20%. This goal has been achieved in this study with the techniques presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1

Literatur

  1. Akura J, Kaneda S, Hatta S, Matsuura K (2000) Controlling astigmatism in cataract surgery requiring relatively large self-sealing incisions. J Cataract Refract Surg 26(11):1650–1659

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Congdon NG, Rao SK, Zhao X et al (2007) Visual outcomes and astigmatism after sutureless, manual cataract extraction in rural China: Study of Cataract Outcomes and Up-Take of Services (SCOUTS) in the caring is hip project, report 1. Arch Ophthalmol 125(11):1539–1544

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ferrer-Blasco T, Montés-Micó R, Peixoto-de-Matos SC et al (2009) Prevalence of corneal astigmatism before cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 35(1):70–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gogate P, Deshpande M, Nirmalan PK (2007) Why do phacoemulsification? Manual small-incision cataract surgery is almost as effective, but less expensive. Ophthalmology 114(5):965–968

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gokhale NS, Sawhney S (2005) Reduction in astigmatism in manual small incision cataract surgery through change of incision site. Indian J Ophthalmol 53(3):201–203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gudmundsdottir E, Jonasson F, Jonsson V et al (2000) With the rule astigmatism is not the rule in the elderly. Reykjavik Eye Study: a population based study of refraction and visual acuity in citizens of Reykjavik 50 years and older. Iceland-Japan Co-Working Study Groups. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 78:642–646

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hennig A, Kumar J, Yorston D, Foster A (2003) Sutureless cataract surgery with nucleus extraction: outcome of a prospective study in Nepal. Br J Ophthalmol 87:266–270

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hennig A, Singh S, Winter I, Yorston D (2010) Can phaco be a cost-effective solution to cataract blindness? Costs and outcomes in Nepal. Eye (Lond) 24(6)

  9. Holladay JT, Cravy TV, Koch DD (1992) Calculating the surgically induced refractive change following ocular surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 18:429–443

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Joshi MR, Shakya S (2009) Change in refractive status of the patients undergoing phacoemulsification surgery. Nepal Med Coll J 11(1):19–22

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kimura H, Kuroda S, Mizoguchi N et al (1999) Extracapsular cataract extraction with a sutureless incision for dense cataracts. J Cataract Refract Surg 25:1275–1279

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lindfield R, Kuper H, Polack S et al (2009) Outcome of cataract surgery at one year in Kenya, the Philippines and Bangladesh. Br J Ophthalmol 93:875–880

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mathenge W, Kuper H, Limburg H et al (2007) Rapid assessment of avoidable blindness in Nakuru district, Kenya. Ophthalmology 114(3):599–605

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Minassian DC, Rosen P, Dart JK et al (2001) Extracapsular cataract extraction compared with small incision surgery by phacoemulsification: a randomised trial. Br J Ophthalmol 85:822–829

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Morlet N, Minassian D, Dart J (2001) Astigmatism and the analysis of its surgical correction. Br J Ophthalmol 85(9):1127–1138

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Murray NL, Murray T (2009) The burden of ocular comorbidity in cataract patients in West Africa. Br J Ophthalmol 93:124–125

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nielsen PJ (1995) Prospective evaluation of surgically induced astigmatism and astigmatic keratotomy effects of various self-sealing small incisions. J Cataract Refract Surg 21(1):43–48

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Nielsen J (1993) Induced astigmatism and its decay with a frown incision. J Cataract Refract Surg19(3):375–379

    Google Scholar 

  19. Oshika T, Sugita G, Tanabe T et al (2000) Regular and irregular astigmatism after superior versus temporal scleral incision cataract surgery. Ophthalmology 107(11):2049–2053

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Prajna NV, Chandrakanth KS, Kim R et al (1998) The Madurai Intraocular Lens Study, II: clinical outcomes. Am J Ophthalmol 125(1):14–25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Thylefors B, Chylack LT Jr, Konyama K et al (2002) WHO Cataract Grading Group. A simplified cataract grading system. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 9(2):83–95

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. World Health Organization (1988) Informal consultation on analysis of blindness prevention outcomes. WHO, Geneva, WHO/PBL/98.68

  23. Zaidi FH, Corbett MC, Burton BJ, Bloom PA (2007) Raising the benchmark for the 21st century – the 1000 cataract operations audit and survey: outcomes. Br J Ophthalmol 91(6):731–736

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Briesen FEBO.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Briesen, S., Roberts, H. Katarakt-Operationsergebnisse durch temporale Kleinschnitttechniken mit und ohne Phakoemulsifikation. Ophthalmologe 109, 462–467 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-011-2513-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-011-2513-8

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation