Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Aberrationskorrigierte Intraokularlinse für die mikroinzisionale Kataraktchirurgie (MICS)

Intraindividueller Vergleich mit einer konventionellen Linse – Einjahresergebnisse

Aberration corrected intraocular lens for microincision cataract surgery (MICS)

Intraindividual comparison with a conventional lens – 1-year follow-up

  • Originalien
  • Published:
Der Ophthalmologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Auf dem Gebiet der Kataraktoperation ist die mikroinzisionale Kataraktchirurgie (MICS) eine wichtige Weiterentwicklung. In diesem Beitrag wurde eine aberrationskorrigierte MICS-IOL aus hydrophilem Acrylat mit hydrophober Oberfläche mit einer einstückigen IOL aus hydrophobem Acrylat hinsichtlich der Kapselsackstabilität, der Abbildungsqualität und der Nachstarentwicklung über 1 Jahr verglichen. Die Operationen wurden als bimanuelle MICS oder als koaxiale Phakoemulsifikation vorgenommen. Insgesamt sind die Ergebnisse nach Implantation der MICS-IOL im Vergleich zur Standardoperation als sehr positiv zu werten.

Abstract

Microincision cataract surgery (MICS) is an important advancement in the field of cataract surgery. This article compares an aberration corrected hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens (IOL) having a hydrophobic surface for MICS with a one-piece hydrophobic acrylic IOL with respect to capsule sac stability, image quality, and after-cataract formation over the course of 1 year. The operations were performed as bimanual MICS or coaxial phacoemulsification. Overall the results after implantation of the IOL by MICS can be regarded as positive in comparison to the standard operation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5

Literatur

  1. Abela-Formanek C, Amon M, Schil G et al. (2002) Uveal and capsular biocompatibility of hydrophilic acrylic, hydrophobic acrylic, and silicone intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 28: 50–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Alió JL, Rodríguez-Prats JL, Galal A et al. (2005) Outcomes of microincision cataract surgery versus coaxial phacoemulsification. Ophthalmology 112: 1997–2003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Alió JL, Schimchak P, Mico RM et al. (2005) Retinal image quality after microincision intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 31: 15557–15560

    Google Scholar 

  4. Alió JL, Rodríguez-Prats JL, Galal A (2006) Advances in microincision cataract surgery intraocular lenses. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 17: 80–93

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Applegate RA, Marsack JD, Ramos R et al. (2003) Interaction between aberrations to improve or reduce visual performance. J Cataract Refract Surg 29: 1487–1495

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bender L, Spalton DJ, Uyanonvara B et al. (2004) POCOman: New system for quantifying posterior capsule opacification. J Cataract Refract Surg 30: 2058–2063

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Böhm T, Wirbelauer C, Pham DT (2006) Optische Qualität der Hornhaut nach inzisionaler Astigmatismuskorrketur. Ophthalmologe 103: 325–330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Buehl W, Findl O, Menapace R et al. (2005) Long-term effect of optic edge design in an acrylic intraocular lens of posterior capsule opacification. J Cataract Refract Surg 31: 954–961

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bühren J, Kasper T, Terzi E et al. (2004) Aberrationen höherer Ordnung nach Implantation einer irisgestützten Vorderkammerlinse (Ophtec Artisan®) in das phake Auge. Ophthalmologe 101: 1194–1201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Caporossi A, Martone G, Casprini F et al. (2007) Prospective randomized study of clinical performance of 3 aspheric and 2 spherical intraocular lenses in 250 eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 23: 639–648

    Google Scholar 

  11. Casprini F, Balestrazzi A, Tosi GM et al. (2005) Glare disability and spherical aberration with five foldable intraocular lenses: a prospective randomized study. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 83: 20–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chenq JW, Wei RL, Cai JP et al. (2007) Efficacy of different intraocular lens materials and optic edge designs in preventing posterior capsular opacification: a meta-analysis. Am J Ophthalmol 143: 428–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Crema AS, Walsh A, Yamane Y et al. (2007) Comparative study of coaxial phacoemulsification and microincision cataract surgery. One-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg 33: 1014–1018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dogru M, Honda R, Omoto M et al. (2004) Early visual results with the rollable ThinOptX intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 30: 558–565

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Elkady B, Alió JL, Ortiz D et al. (2008) Corneal aberrations after microincision cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 34: 40–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Heatley CJ, Spalton DJ, Kumar A et al. (2005) Comparison of posterior capsule opacification rates between hydrophilic and hydrophobic single-piece acrylic intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 31: 718–724

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jaffe NS (1981) Postoperative corneal astigmatism. In: Jaffe NS (Hrsg) Cataract surgery and its complications, CV Mosby, St. Louis 92–110

  18. Jahnke M, Wirbelauer C, Pham DT (2006) Einfluss des Alters auf die optischen Aberrationen des menschlichen Auges. Ophthalmologe 103: 596–604

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kahraman G, Amon M, Franz C et al. (2007) Intraindividual comparison of surgical trauma after bimanual microincision and conventional small-incision coaxial phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg 33: 618–622

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kaya V, Öztürker ZK, Öztürker C et al. (2007) ThinOptX vs AcrySof: comparison of visual and refractive results, contrast sensitivity, and the incidence of posterior capsule opacification. Eur J Ophthalmol 17: 307–314

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kugelberg M, Wejde G, Jayaram H et al. (2006) Posterior capsule opacification after implantation of a hydrophilic of hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens: one-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg 32: 1627–1631

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kurz S, Krummenauer F, Gabriel P et al. (2006) Biaxial microincision versus coaxial small-incision clear cornea cataract surgery. Ophthalmology 113: 1818–1826

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mayer C, Wirbelauer C, Häberle H et al. (2005) Zur Notwendigkeit eines Augenverbandes nach Kataraktoperation in Tropfanästhesie. Klin Monatsbl Augenheikd 222: 41–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Menapace R (2007) Nachstarbildung nach Intraokularlinsenimplantation. Teil I: Genese und Prävention durch Optimierung konventioneller Linsenimplantate und Operationstechniken. Ophthalmologe 104: 253–264

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Menapace R (2007) Nachstarbildung nach Intraokularlinsenimplantation. Teil II: Prävention mittels alternativer Implantate und Techniken. Ophthalmologe 104: 345–356

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mester U, Dillinger P, Aberist N (2003) Impact of a modified optic design on visual function: Clinical comparative study. J Cataract Refract Surg 29: 652–660

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Möglich M, Wirbelauer C, Häberle H et al. (2005) Bimanuelle Phakoemulsifikation und Intraokularlinsen für die Mikroinzisionale-Kataraktchirurgie. In: Behrens-Baumann W, Auffarth GU, Pham DT (Hrsg) 19. Kongressband der DGII, Biermann, Köln, S 25–29

  28. Möglich M, Wirbelauer C, Häberle et al. (2006) Analyse der okulären Aberrationen nach Mikroinzisionaler-Kataraktchirurgie (MICS). In: Kohnen T, Auffarth GU, Pham DT (Hrsg) 20. Kongressband der DGII, Biermann, Köln, S 355–360

  29. Nishi Y, Rabsilber TM, Limberger IL et al. (2007) Influence of 360-degree enhanced optic edge design of a hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens on posterior capsule opacification. J Catarct Refract Surg 33: 227–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Pandey SK, Werner L, Agarwal A et al. (2002) Phakonit: cataract removal through a sub-1.0 mm incision and implantation of the ThinOptX rollable intraocular lens (letter). J Cataract Refract Surg 28: 1710–1713

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pesudovs K, Dietze H, Stewart OG et al. (2005) Effect of cataract surgery incision location and intraocular lens type on ocular aberrations. J Cataract Refract Surg 31: 725–734

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Prakash P, Kasaby HE, Aqqarwal RK et al. (2007) Microincision bimanual phacoemulsification and ThinOptx implanation through a 1,70 mm incision. Eye 21: 177–182

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ricci F, Scuderi G, Missiroli F et al. (2004) Low contrast visual acuity in pseudophakic patients implanted with an anterior surface modified prolate intraocular lens. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 82: 718–722

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Tzelikis PF, Akaishi L, Trindade FC et al. (2007) Ocular aberrations and contrast sensitivity after cataract surgery with AcrySof IQ intraocular lens implantation. Clinical comparative study. J Cataract Refract Surg 33: 1918–1924

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Von Jagow B, Wirbelauer C, Häberle H et al. (2007) Frühe visuelle Rehabilitation nach Kataratoperation in kombinierter topischer und intrakameraler Anästhesie. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 224: 585–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang Y, Zhao K, Jin Y et al. (2003) Changes of higher-order aberrration with various pupil sizes in the myopic eye. J Cataract Refract Surg 19: S270–S274

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wehner W (2007) Mirkoinzisionsintraokularlinse mit Plattenhaptik. Rotationsstabilität und Zentrierungsverhalten einer Mikroinzisionsintraokularlinse mit Plattenhaptik im Nachbeobachtungszeitraum von 12-19 Monaten. Ophthalmologe 104: 393–398

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Weikert MP (2006) Update on microincisional cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 17: 62–67

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Weinand F, Jung A, Stein A et al. (2007) Rotational stability of a single-piece hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens: new method for high-precision rotation control. J Cataract Refract Surg 33: 800–803

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Weindler J, Weindler M, Ruprecht KW (2004) Lokalanästhesie in der Ophthalmochirurgie. Ophthalmologe 101: 847–865

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Wirbelauer C, Weller A, Häberle H et al. (2004) Kataraktoperation in topischer Anästhesie unter oraler Antikoagulation. Klin Monatsbl Augenheildk 221: 749–752

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Wirbelauer C, Pham DT (2008) Operative Erfahrungen mit der koaxialen Mikro-Phakoemulsifikation. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 225: 212–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Yao K, Tang X, Ye P (2006) Corneal astigmatism, high order aberrations, and optical quality after cataract surgery: microincision versus small incision. J Refract Surg 22: S1079–S1092

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Keine Angaben.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln, Rudower Straße 48, 12351, Berlin, Deutschland

    M. Möglich, H. Häberle, D.T. Pham & C. Wirbelauer

Authors
  1. M. Möglich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H. Häberle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D.T. Pham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. C. Wirbelauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Möglich.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Möglich, M., Häberle, H., Pham, D. et al. Aberrationskorrigierte Intraokularlinse für die mikroinzisionale Kataraktchirurgie (MICS). Ophthalmologe 106, 899–904 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-008-1846-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-008-1846-4

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Search

Navigation