Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Femtosekundenlaser

Neue Anwendungsgebiete in der refraktiven Chirurgie

  • Einführung zum Thema
  • Published:
Der Ophthalmologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Colin J, Cochener B, Savary G et al. (2001) INTACS inserts for treating keratoconus: one-year results. Ophthalmology 108: 1409–1414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Durrie DS, Kezirian GM (2005) Femtosecond laser versus mechanical keratome flaps in wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: prospective contralateral eye study. J Cataract Refract Surg 31:120–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ghanem RC, Azar DT (2006) Femtosecond-laser arcuate wedge-shaped resection to correct high residual astigmatism after penetration keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg 32: 1415–1419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hoffmann S, Krummenauer F, Tehrani, Dick HB (2003) Impact of head advance and oscillation rate on the flap parameter: a comparison of two microkeratomes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 241: 149–153

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Holzer MP, Rabsilber TM, Auffarth GU (2006) Femtosecond laser-assisted corneal flap cuts: morphology, accuracy, and histopathology. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47: 2828–2831

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kezirian GM, Stonecipher KG (2004) Comparison of the Intralase femtosecond laser and mechanical keratomes for laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 30: 804–811

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Krueger RR, Kuszak J, Lubatschowski H et al. (2005) First safety study of femtosecond laser photodisruption in animal lenses: tissue morphology and cataractogenesis. J Cataract Refract Surg 31: 2386–2394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lim T, Yang S, Kim M et al. (2006) Comparison of the Intralase femtosecond laser and mechanical microkeratome for laser in situ keratomileusis. AM J Ophthalmol 141: 833–839

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Seitz B, Brunner H, Viestenz A et al. (2005) Inverse mushroom-shaped nonmechanical penetrating keratoplasty using a femtosecond laser. Am J Ophthalmol 139: 941–944

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Songio B, Iordanidou V, Chong-Sit D et al. (2006) In vivocorneal confocal microscopy comparison of Intralase femtosecond laser and mechanical microkeratome for laser in situ keratomileusis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47: 2803–2811

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Stonecipher K, Ignacio TS, Stonecipher M (2006) Advances in refractive surgery: microkeratome and femtosecond laser flap creation in relation to safety, efficacy, predictability, and biomechanical stability. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 17: 368–372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stonecipher K, Dishler JG, Ignacio TS, Binder PS (2006) Transient light sensitivity after femtosecond laser flap creation: clinical findings and management. J Cataract Refract Surg 32: 91–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tehrani M, Schäfer S, Dick HB (2004) Evaluation of cut quality using the Amadeus microkeratome with different settings. J Cataract Refract Surg 30: 2415–2419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universitäts-Augenklinik, In der Schornau 23-25, 44892, Bochum

    H. B. Dick

Authors
  1. H. B. Dick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dick, H.B. Femtosekundenlaser. Ophthalmologe 103, 1003–1004 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-006-1454-0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-006-1454-0

Search

Navigation