Data availability
Not applicable.
References
Szczesniewski JJ, Tellez Fouz C, Ramos Alba A, Diaz Goizueta FJ, García Tello A, Llanes González L (2023) ChatGPT and most frequent urological diseases: analysing the quality of information and potential risks for patients. World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04563-0
Cocci A, Pezzoli M, Lo Re M, Russo GI, Asmundo MG, Fode M, Durukan E (2023) Quality of information and appropriateness of ChatGPT outputs for urology patients. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-023-00705-y
Gabrielson AT, Odisho AY, Canes D (2023) Harnessing generative artificial intelligence to improve efficiency among urologists: welcome ChatGPT. J Urol 209(5):827–829
Cooper CS (2023) A potpourri of pediatric urology: Real artificial intelligence. J Pediatr Urol 19(2):219–221
Spatz ES, Suter LG, George E et al (2020) An instrument for assessing the quality of informed consent documents for elective procedures: development and testing. BMJ Open 10(5):e033297
Xv Y, Peng C, Wei Z, Liao F, Xiao M (2023) Can Chat-GPT a substitute for urological resident physician in diagnosing diseases?: a preliminary conclusion from an exploratory investigation. World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04539-0
Checcucci E, Verri P, Amparore D, Cacciamani GE, Fiori C, Breda A, Porpiglia F (2023) Generative pre-training transformer chat (ChatGPT) in the scientific community: the train has left the station. Minerva Urol Nephrol 75(2):131–133
Deebel NA, Terlecki R (2023) ChatGPT performance on the American Urological Association (AUA) self-assessment study program and the potential influence of artificial intelligence (AI) in urologic training. Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2023.05.010
Reis LO (2023) ChatGPT for medical applications and urological science. Int Braz J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2023.0112
Acknowledgements
The author used ChatGPT-4 for initial drafting of the article.
Funding
The author certifies that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
PPR: The author contributed to the conceptualisation, writing, editing, and reviewing of this editorial article.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares no conflict of interests.
Ethics approval and informed consent
No human patients were involved in the study. No need Ethics Committee was required.
Clinical trial registration number
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ray, P.P. Generative AI: in rescue of healthcare reformation. World J Urol 41, 3391–3392 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04622-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04622-6