Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Standardized technique for ejaculation preservation during prostatic endoscopic ablative surgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Ejaculatory dysfunction is the most common side effect of benign prostatic hyperplasia surgery. Modified techniques have emerged with the aim of preserving antegrade ejaculation without compromising obstruction relief. None are standardized or validated. The PARTURP study is a randomized study investigating partial versus complete prostate resection. We conducted an investigator consensus meeting to define the ideal surgical technique to achieve both correct obstruction relief with ejaculation preservation.

Methods

An expert consensus meeting involving all investigators of the PARTURP study took place to define a common technique using the nominal group methodology. The objectives were to define the areas to be resected and the areas to be preserved; to define the criteria for proper obstruction relief; to define the criteria for proper ejaculation preservation.

Results

All investigators (n = 15) attended the consensus meeting, and agreement between all the participants was obtained. The anatomical landmarks to be preserved are located around the verumontanum and along the posterior part of the prostatic urethra. These structures must be preserved up to 2 cm from the verumontanum. The participants agreed on the need to preserve the urethral mucosa in all the areas to be preserved and to reach the enucleation plane in the areas of resection.

Conclusions

Anatomical landmarks for ejaculation-sparing surgery have been defined by the investigators of the PARTURP randomized study. These landmarks will be used during the study, and the clinical outcomes of this ejaculation-sparing technique will be compared with complete resection with up to 3 years follow-up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

All the data is already provided in the article.

References

  1. Rosen R, Altwein J, Boyle P et al (2003) Lower urinary tract symptoms and male sexual dysfunction: the multinational survey of the aging male (MSAM-7). Eur Urol 44:637–649

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Marra G, Sturch P, Oderda M et al (2016) Systematic review of lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia surgical treatments on men’s ejaculatory function: Time for a bespoke approach? Int J Urol Off J Jpn Urol Assoc 23:22–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.12866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Descazeaud A, Robert G, Delongchamps NB et al (2012) Initial assessment, follow-up and treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms related to benign prostatic hyperplasia: guidelines of the LUTS committee of the French urological association. Prog En Urol J Assoc Fr Urol Société Fr Urol 22:977–988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2012.10.001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gratzke C, Bachmann A, Descazeaud A et al (2015) EAU guidelines on the assessment of non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms including benign prostatic obstruction. Eur Urol 67:1099–1109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kuntz RM, Ahyai S, Lehrich K, Fayad A (2004) Transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus transurethral electrocautery resection of the prostate: a randomized prospective trial in 200 patients. J Urol 172:1012–1016. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000136218.11998.9e

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ahyai SA, Lehrich K, Kuntz RM (2007) Holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate: 3-year follow-up results of a randomized clinical trial. Eur Urol 52:1456–1463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2007.04.053

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Thomas JA, Tubaro A, Barber N et al (2016) A multicenter randomized noninferiority trial comparing greenlight-XPS laser vaporization of the prostate and transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction: two-yr outcomes of the GOLIATH study. Eur Urol 69:94–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Feldman HA, Goldstein I, Hatzichristou DG et al (1994) Impotence and its medical and psychosocial correlates: results of the Massachusetts male aging study. J Urol 151:54–61

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Malde S, Umbach R, Wheeler JR et al (2021) A Systematic review of patients’ values, preferences, and expectations for the diagnosis and treatment of male lower urinary tract symptoms. Eur Urol 79:796–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.12.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gil-Vernet JM, Alvarez-Vijande R, Gil-Vernet A, Gil-Vernet JM (1994) Ejaculation in men: a dynamic endorectal ultrasonographical study. Br J Urol 73:442–448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lebdai S, Chevrot A, Doizi S et al (2019) Do patients have to choose between ejaculation and miction? A systematic review about ejaculation preservation technics for benign prostatic obstruction surgical treatment. World J Urol 37:299–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2368-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sturch P, Woo HH, McNicholas T, Muir G (2015) Ejaculatory dysfunction after treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms: retrograde ejaculation or retrograde thinking? BJU Int 115:186–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12868

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Alloussi SH, Lang C, Eichel R, Alloussi S (2014) Ejaculation-preserving transurethral resection of prostate and bladder neck: short- and long-term results of a new innovative resection technique. J Endourol Endourol Soc 28:84–89. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2013.0093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ronzoni G, De Vecchis M (1998) Preservation of anterograde ejaculation after transurethral resection of both the prostate and bladder neck. Br J Urol 81:830–833

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ben Rhouma S, Ben Chehida MA, Ahmed S et al (2016) MP42–18 Can we preserve ejaculation after transurethral resection of the prostate? comparative study between the conventional technique and a new technique about 70 cases. J Urol 195:e577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Leonardi R (2009) Preliminary results on selective light vaporization with the side-firing 980 nm diode laser in benign prostatic hyperplasia: an ejaculation sparing technique. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 12:277–280. https://doi.org/10.1038/pcan.2009.5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Talab SS, Santiago-Lastra YA, Bachmann A et al (2013) V403 The impact of ejaculation-preserving photo-selective vaporization of the prostate (ep-pvp) on lower urinary tract symptoms and ejaculatory function: results of a multicenter study. J Urol 189:e164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.1792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tabatabaei S, Choi B, Muir G (2011) 2272 Ejaculation-Preserving Photoselective Vaporization Of Prostate(EP-PVP): six years experience from a multi-centre study. J Urol 185:e910–e911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.02.2515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Miyauchi T, Yusu H, Kanzaki M (2016) V3–06 ejaculation-sparing photoselective vaporization of the prostate: evaluation of the ejaculatory function and the lower urinary tract symptoms. J Urol 195:e468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.1526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bozzini G, Berti L, Maltagliati M et al (2021) Ejaculation-sparing thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ES-ThuLEP): outcomes on a large cohort. World J Urol 39:2029–2035. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03442-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim SH, Yang H-K, Lee H-E et al (2014) HoLEP does not affect the overall sexual function of BPH patients: a prospective study. Asian J Androl 16:873–877. https://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.132469

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Xu C, Xu Z, Lin C et al (2019) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: modified two-lobe technique versus traditional three-lobe technique-a randomized study. BioMed Res Int 2019:3875418. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3875418

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Roehrborn CG, Barkin J, Gange SN et al (2017) Five year results of the prospective randomized controlled prostatic urethral L.I.F.T. study. Can J Urol 24:8802–8813

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gratzke C, Barber N, Speakman MJ et al (2017) Prostatic urethral lift vs transurethral resection of the prostate: 2-year results of the BPH6 prospective, multicentre, randomized study. BJU Int 119:767–775. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13714

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pisco J, Bilhim T, Pinheiro LC et al (2016) Prostate embolization as an alternative to open surgery in patients with large prostate and moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms. J Vasc Interv Radiol JVIR 27:700–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2016.01.138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mynderse LA, Hanson D, Robb RA et al (2015) rezūm system water vapor treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia: validation of convective thermal energy transfer and characterization with magnetic resonance imaging and 3-dimensional renderings. Urology 86:122–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2015.03.021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gilling P, Barber N, Bidair M et al (2019) Two-year outcomes after aquablation compared to TURP: efficacy and ejaculatory improvements sustained. Adv Ther 36:1326–1336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-019-00952-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Chughtai B, Elterman D, Shore N et al (2021) The iTind temporarily implanted nitinol device for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Urology 153:270–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.12.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wilisch J, Pradere B, Misrai V et al (2021) An update on the most recent mini-invasive surgical and interventional techniques in the management of benign prostatic obstruction. Progres En Urol J Assoc Francaise Urol Soc Francaise Urol 31:266–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2020.12.001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rankin NM, McGregor D, Butow PN et al (2016) Adapting the nominal group technique for priority setting of evidence-practice gaps in implementation science. BMC Med Res Methodol 16:110. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0210-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Van de Ven AH, Delbecq AL (1972) The nominal group as a research instrument for exploratory health studies. Am J Public Health 62:337–342. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.62.3.337

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Kragt F, Schellen A (1978) Clinical report about some cases with retrograde ejaculation. Andrologia 10:381–384. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0272.1978.tb03053.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hedlund H, Ek A (1985) Ejaculation and sexual function after endoscopic bladder neck incision. Br J Urol 57:164–167

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Yang SS-D, Tsai Y-C, Chen J-J et al (2008) Modified transurethral incision of the bladder neck treating primary bladder neck obstruction in young men: a method to improve voiding function and to preserve antegrade ejaculation. Urol Int 80:26–30. https://doi.org/10.1159/000111725

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kim M, Song SH, Ku JH et al (2015) Pilot study of the clinical efficacy of ejaculatory hood sparing technique for ejaculation preservation in Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. Int J Impot Res 27:20–24. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijir.2014.22

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Jones J, Hunter D (1995) Consensus methods for medical and health services research. BMJ 311:376–380. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.7001.376

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Fink A, Kosecoff J, Chassin M, Brook RH (1984) Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use. Am J Public Health 74:979–983. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.74.9.979

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Søndergaard E, Ertmann RK, Reventlow S, Lykke K (2018) Using a modified nominal group technique to develop general practice. BMC Fam Pract 19:117. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-018-0811-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This interventional research obtained funding from the French Ministry of Social Affairs and Health (PHRC National, 2019, no. 19-0048).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LR: project development, member of the nominal group committee, data collection, data interpretation, manuscript writing. S, BB, B: project development, data collection, data interpretation, manuscript reviewing. BD, B, B, P, DN, D, D, F, M, M, R, R, V: member of the nominal group committee, data collection, data interpretation, manuscript reviewing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Souhil Lebdai.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

Not applicable.

Informed consent

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lebdai, S., Ben Boujema, M., Benard, A. et al. Standardized technique for ejaculation preservation during prostatic endoscopic ablative surgery. World J Urol 41, 3041–3049 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04592-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04592-9

Keywords

Navigation