Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Delphi consensus to standardize the technique of anatomical endoscopic enucleation of prostate: a study by ESUT endoscopic enucleation of prostate study group

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Our objective was to establish a standardized technique for Anatomical Endoscopic Enucleation of Prostate (AEEP) utilizing a consensus statement to provide robust recommendations for urologists who are new to this procedure.

Methods

The participants were electronically sent a questionnaire in three consecutive rounds. In the second and third rounds, the anonymous aggregate results of the previous round were presented. Experts’ feedback and comments were then incorporated to refine existing questions or to explore more controversial topics in greater depth.

Results

Forty-one urologists participated in the first round. In the second round, all Round 1 participants received a 22-question survey, resulting in a consensus on 21 items. In the third round, 76% (19/25) of the second-round respondents also participated, reaching a consensus on 22 additional items. The panelists consensually agreed on detaching the urethral sphincter at the beginning of the enucleation and not at the end of the enucleation. To prevent incontinence, it was recommended that the apical mucosa be preserved through various approaches between 11 and 1 o’clock while gently disrupting the lateral lobes in their apical part, avoiding an excess energy delivery approximation to the apical mucosa.

Conclusion

To optimize laser AEEP procedures, urologists must follow expert guidelines on equipment and surgical technique, including early apical release, using the 3-lobe technique for enucleation, preserving apical mucosa with appropriate approaches, gently disrupting lateral lobes at their apical regions, and avoiding excessive energy delivery near the apical mucosa. Following these recommendations can lead to improved outcomes and patient satisfaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hiraoka Y (1983) A new method of prostatectomy, transurethral detachment and resection of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Nihon Ika Daigaku Zasshi 50(6):896–898

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fraundorfer MR, Gilling PJ (1998) Holmium:YAG laser enucleation of the prostate combined with mechanical morcellation: preliminary results. Eur Urol 33(1):69–72

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Elkoushy MA, Elshal AM, Elhilali MM (2015) Reoperation after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for management of benign prostatic hyperplasia: assessment of risk factors with time to event analysis. J Endourol 29(7):797–804

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Enikeev D, Taratkin M, Morozov A, Singla N, Gabdulina S, Tarasov A et al (2020) Long-term outcomes of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: a 5-year single-center experience. J Endourol 34(10):1055–1063

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Vincent MW, Gilling PJ (2015) HoLEP has come of age. World J Urol 33(4):487–493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Michalak J, Tzou D, Funk J (2015) HoLEP: the gold standard for the surgical management of BPH in the 21(st) century. Am J Clin Exp Urol 3(1):36–42

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Enikeev D, Morozov A, Taratkin M, Misrai V, Rijo E, Podoinitsin A et al (2021) Systematic review of the endoscopic enucleation of the prostate learning curve. World J Urol 39(7):2427–2438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Horwich A, Babjuk M, Bellmunt J, Bruins HM, De Reijke TM, De Santis M et al (2019) EAU-ESMO consensus statements on the management of advanced and variant bladder cancer-an international collaborative multi-stakeholder effort: under the auspices of the EAU and ESMO Guidelines Committees. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol 30(11):1697–1727

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lam TBL, MacLennan S, Willemse PM, Mason MD, Plass K, Shepherd R et al (2019) EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG prostate cancer guideline panel consensus statements for deferred treatment with curative intent for localised prostate cancer from an international collaborative study (DETECTIVE Study). Eur Urol 76(6):790–813

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. De Meyer D, Kottner J, Beele H, Schmitt J, Lange T, Van Hecke A et al (2019) Delphi procedure in core outcome set development: rating scale and consensus criteria determined outcome selection. J Clin Epidemiol 111:23–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. de Figueiredo FCA, Cracco CM, de Marins RL, Scoffone CM (2020) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: problem-based evolution of the technique. Andrologia 52(8):e13582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schultz A, Bay-Nielsen H, Bilde T, Christiansen L, Mikkelsen AM, Steven K (1989) Prevention of urethral stricture formation after transurethral resection of the prostate: a controlled randomized study of Otis urethrotomy versus urethral dilation and the use of the polytetrafluoroethylene coated versus the uninsulated metal sheath. J Urol 141(1):73–75

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bozzini G, Besana U, Calori A, Berti L, Maltagliati M, Sighinolfi MC et al (2020) 7U-Thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (7U-ThuLEP): description of the technique. Urol Video J 7:100036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Elmansy H, Hodhod A, Kotb A, Prowse O, Shahrour W (2019) Top-down holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: technical aspects and early outcomes. Urology 126:236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Endo F, Shiga Y, Minagawa S, Iwabuchi T, Fujisaki A, Yashi M et al (2010) Anteroposterior dissection HoLEP: a modification to prevent transient stress urinary incontinence. Urology 76(6):1451–1455

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gong YG, He DL, Wang MZ, Li XD, Zhu GD, Zheng ZH et al (2012) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: a modified enucleation technique and initial results. J Urol 187(4):1336–1340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Herrmann TR, Bach T, Imkamp F, Georgiou A, Burchardt M, Oelke M et al (2010) Thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP): transurethral anatomical prostatectomy with laser support. Introduction of a novel technique for the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction. World J Urol 28(1):45–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim YJ, Lee YH, Kwon JB, Cho SR, Kim JS (2015) A novel one lobe technique of thulium laser enucleation of the prostate: ‘all-in-one’ technique. Korean J Urol 56(11):769–774

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Law KW, Elterman DS, Cash H, Rijo E, Chughtai B, Misrai V et al (2019) Anatomic greenlight laser vaporization-incision technique for benign prostatic hyperplasia using the XPS LBO-180W system: how I do it. Can J Urol 26(5):9963–9972

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Miernik A, Schoeb DS (2019) “Three horse shoe-like incision” holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: first experience with a novel en bloc technique for anatomic transurethral prostatectomy. World J Urol 37(3):523–528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Minagawa S, Okada S, Sakamoto H, Toyofuku K, Morikawa H (2015) En-bloc technique with anteroposterior dissection holmium laser enucleation of the prostate allows a short operative time and acceptable outcomes. Urology 86(3):628–633

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Oh SJ (2019) Current surgical techniques of enucleation in holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. Investig Clin Urol 60(5):333–342

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Rücker F, Lehrich K, Böhme A, Zacharias M, Ahyai SA, Hansen J (2021) A call for HoLEP: en-bloc vs. two-lobe vs. three-lobe. World J Urol 39(7):2337–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Saitta G, Becerra JEA, Del Álamo JF, González LL, Elbers JR, Suardi N et al (2019) ‘En Bloc’ HoLEP with early apical release in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. World J Urol 37(11):2451–2458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Scoffone CM, Cracco CM (2016) The en-bloc no-touch holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) technique. World J Urol 34(8):1175–1181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tunc L, Yalcin S, Kaya E, Gazel E, Yılmaz S, Aybal HC et al (2021) The “Omega Sign”: a novel HoLEP technique that improves continence outcomes after enucleation. World J Urol 39(1):135–141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gilling PJ (2020) HoLEP is the complete technique for treating BPH. BJU Int 126(1):3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bozzini G, Berti L, Maltagliati M, Besana U, Calori A, Müller A et al (2021) Ejaculation-sparing thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ES-ThuLEP): outcomes on a large cohort. World J Urol 39(6):2029–2035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gild P, Dahlem R, Pompe RS, Soave A, Vetterlein MW, Ludwig TA et al (2020) Retrograde ejaculation after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP)-Impact on sexual function and evaluation of patient bother using validated questionnaires. Andrology 8(6):1779–1786

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Houssin V, Olivier J, Brenier M, Pierache A, Laniado M, Mouton M et al (2021) Predictive factors of urinary incontinence after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: a multicentric evaluation. World J Urol 39(1):143–148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Shah HN, Mahajan AP, Sodha HS, Hegde S, Mohile PD, Bansal MB (2007) Prospective evaluation of the learning curve for holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. J Urol 177(4):1468–1474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Robert G, Cornu JN, Fourmarier M, Saussine C, Descazeaud A, Azzouzi AR et al (2016) Multicentre prospective evaluation of the learning curve of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). BJU Int 117(3):495–499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Peyronnet B, Robert G, Comat V, Rouprêt M, Gomez-Sancha F, Cornu JN et al (2017) Learning curves and perioperative outcomes after endoscopic enucleation of the prostate: a comparison between greenlight 532-nm and holmium lasers. World J Urol 35(6):973–983

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kleinguetl C, Virani S, Bird ET, El Tayeb MM (2020) Safety and efficacy of male urethral slings for management of persistent stress urinary incontinence after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. Proc (Baylor Univ Med Cent) 33(4):554–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sabbagh P, Dupuis H, Cornu JN (2021) State of the art on stress incontinence management after benign prostatic obstruction surgery. Curr Opin Urol 31(5):473–478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Cavkaytar S, Kokanali MK, Topcu HO, Aksakal OS, Doğanay M (2015) Effect of home-based Kegel exercises on quality of life in women with stress and mixed urinary incontinence. J Obstet Gynaecol 35(4):407–410

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hagen S, Elders A, Stratton S, Sergenson N, Bugge C, Dean S et al (2020) Effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle training with and without electromyographic biofeedback for urinary incontinence in women: multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ (Clin Res Ed) 371:m3719

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LT: protocol/project development, data collection or management, data analysis, manuscript writing/editing TH: protocol/project development, data analysis, manuscript writing/editing, SG: data collection or management, data analysis, manuscript writing/editing, CMS: protocol/project development, data analysis, manuscript writing/editing, GB protocol/project development, data analysis, manuscript writing/editing, SY: protocol/project development, data collection or management, data analysis, manuscript writing/editing, JRO: protocol/project development, data analysis, manuscript writing/editing, VM: protocol/project development, data analysis, manuscript writing/editing, AP: protocol/project development, data analysis, manuscript writing/editing, SA: protocol/project development, data analysis, manuscript writing/editing, ASG: protocol/project development, data collection or management, data analysis, manuscript writing/editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Serdar Gozen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

No human subjects or animals were involved in this study.

Informed consent

Due to the nature of this article, acquisition of informed consent is not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 35 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tunc, L., Herrmann, T., Guven, S. et al. A Delphi consensus to standardize the technique of anatomical endoscopic enucleation of prostate: a study by ESUT endoscopic enucleation of prostate study group. World J Urol 41, 2303–2309 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04496-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04496-8

Keywords

Navigation