Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reply letter to: False discovery rate in laser studies

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The Original Article was published on 12 April 2023

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Data availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Nguyen D (2023) False discovery rate in laser studies. World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04401-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Greenland S, Senn SJ, Rothman KJ, Carlin JB, Poole C, Goodman SN et al (2016) Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations. Eur J Epidemiol 31(4):337–350

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Schweder T, Spjøtvoll E (1982) Plots of p-values to evaluate many tests simultaneously. Biometrika 69(3):493–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B 57(1):289–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fregni F, Illigens BM (2018) Critical thinking in clinical research: applied theory and practice using case studies. Oxford University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Strimmer K (2008) A unified approach to false discovery rate estimation. BMC Bioinform. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ulvik Ø, Æsøy MS, Juliebø-Jones P, Gjengstø P, Beisland C (2022) Thulium fibre laser versus holmium: YAG for ureteroscopic lithotripsy: outcomes from a prospective randomised clinical trial. Eur Urol 82(1):73–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Armstrong RA (2014) When to use the Bonferroni correction. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 34(5):502–508

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Perneger TV (1998) What’s wrong with Bonferroni adjustments. BMJ Br Med J 316(7139):1236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jager LR, Leek JT (2014) An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and application to the top medical literature. Biostatistics 15(1):1–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This is an independent study and is not funded by any external body.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sorbonne University GRC Urolithiasis No. 20 Tenon Hospital, 75020, Paris, France

    Mariela Corrales, Frédéric Panthier, Catalina Solano & Olivier Traxer

  2. Department of Urology AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Tenon Hospital, 75020, Paris, France

    Mariela Corrales, Frédéric Panthier, Catalina Solano & Olivier Traxer

  3. Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy

    Eugenio Ventimiglia

Authors
  1. Mariela Corrales
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Frédéric Panthier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Catalina Solano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Eugenio Ventimiglia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Olivier Traxer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MC: Data collection, data analysis, manuscript writing. EV: Data collection, manuscript editing. FP: manuscript editing. CS: manuscript editing. OT: Protocol/project development, manuscript editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mariela Corrales.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights

This research is a review paper and does not involve research in humans or animals, nor informed consent.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Corrales, M., Panthier, F., Solano, C. et al. Reply letter to: False discovery rate in laser studies. World J Urol 41, 1995–1996 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04457-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04457-1

Search

Navigation