Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Complications associated with minimally invasive surgical therapies (MIST) for surgical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database review

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

MAUDE database houses medical device reports of suspected device-related complications received by Food and Drug Administration. In the present study we aim to evaluate the MAUDE database for reported complications of MIST procedures.

Methods

The database was queried using keywords: rezum, urolift, prostate embolization (PAE), transurethral needle ablation (TUNA), transurethral microwave therapy (TUMT), prostate stent and Temporarily Implanted Nitinol Device (iTIND) on 10/1/22 to extract information regarding device problems and procedure-related complications. Gupta classification system was used to stratify complications. Statistical analysis was performed to compare frequency of complications among MIST procedures.

Results

We found a total of 692 reports (Rezum-358, urolift-226, PAE-53, TUNA-31, TUMT-19, prostatic stent-4, and iTIND-1). Most complications related to device or users were minor (level 1 and 2) and there was no significant difference among various MIST procedures. The screen/system error was responsible for 93% and 83% aborted cases in Rezum and TUNA, respectively, and PAE showed 40% of device component detachment/fracture. Overall Urolift and TUMT were associated with statistically significant higher incidence of major (level 3 and 4) complications (23% and 21%, respectively) as compared with Rezum (7%). Most major complications needing hospitalization after Urolift included hematoma and hematuria with clots and those after Rezum included urinary tract infection and sepsis. Thirteen deaths were reported, mostly due to cardiovascular events, which were classified as not associated with the proposed treatment.

Conclusion

MIST for BPH can occasionally cause significant morbidity. Our data should assist urologists and patients in shared decision-making process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data would be made available upon request by corresponding author.

Abbreviations

AE:

Adverse event

AUA:

American Urological Association

BPH:

Benign prostatic hyperplasia

EAU:

European Association of Urology

FDA:

Food and Drug Administration

iTIND:

Temporarily Implanted Nitinol Device

LUTS:

Lower urinary tract symptoms

MAUDE:

Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience

MIST:

Minimally invasive surgical therapies

OML:

Obstructive middle lobe

PAE:

Prostate artery embolization

PUL:

Prostatic urethral lift

RCT:

Randomized clinical trial

TUMT:

Transurethral microwave therapy

TUNA:

Transurethral needle ablation

TURP:

Transurethral resection of the prostate

UTI:

Urinary tract infection

References

  1. Berry SJ, Coffey DS, Walsh PC, Ewing LL (1984) The development of human benign prostatic hyperplasia with age. J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)49698-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lerner LB, McVary KT, Barry MJ, Bixler BR, Dahm P, Das AK, Gandhi MC, Kaplan SA, Kohler TS, Martin L, Parsons JK, Roehrborn CG, Stoffel JT, Welliver C, Wilt TJ (2021) Management of lower urinary tract symptoms attributed to benign prostatic hyperplasia: AUA GUIDELINE PART I-initial work-up and medical management. J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gravas S, Cornu JN, Gacci M, Gratzke C, Herrmann TRW, Mamoulakis C, Rieken M, Speakman MJ, Tikkinen KAO, Guidelines Associates: Karavitakis M, Kyriazis I, Malde S, Sakalis V, Guidelines Office: Schouten N, Smith EJ (2022) EAU guidelines on management of non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), incl. benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). In: Presented at the EAU annual congress Amsterdam 2022

  4. Checcucci E et al (2021) New ultra-minimally invasive surgical treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and analysis of comparative outcomes. Eur Urol Open Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2021.08.009

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Manfredi C et al (2022) Emerging minimally invasive transurethral treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review with meta-analysis of functional outcomes and description of complications. Minerva Urol Nephrol. https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.21.04530-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bouhadana D, Nguyen D-D, Zorn KC, Elterman DS, Bhojani N (2020) Patient perspectives on benign prostatic hyperplasia surgery: a focus on sexual health. J Sex Med. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.07.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gurtcheff SE (2008) Introduction to the MAUDE Database. Clin Obstet Gynecol. https://doi.org/10.1097/GRF.0b013e318161e657

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. MAUDE—Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfmaude/search.cfm

  9. Kaplan-Marans E, Martinez M, Wood A, Cochran J, Dubowitch E, Schulman A (2022) Aquablation, prostatic urethral lift, and transurethral water vapor therapy: a comparison of device-related adverse events in a national registry. J Endourol. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2021.0455

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Patel NH et al (2019) Device malfunctions and complications associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia surgery: review of the manufacturer and user facility device experience database. J Endourol. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2019.0067

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Weiss JK, Santucci NM, Sajadi KP, Chouhan JD (2021) Post-surgical complications after bladder outlet reducing surgery: an analysis of the FDA manufacturer and user facility device experience (MAUDE) database. Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2021.04.030

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Gupta P et al (2017) Development of a classification scheme for examining adverse events associated with medical devices, specifically the DaVinci surgical system as reported in the FDA MAUDE database. J Endourol. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.0396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McVary KT et al (2016) Minimally invasive prostate convective water vapor energy ablation: a multicenter, randomized, controlled study for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.10.181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McVary KT et al (2016) Erectile and ejaculatory function preserved with convective water vapor energy treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia: randomized controlled study. J Sex Med. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.03.372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. McVary KT, Rogers T, Roehrborn CG (2019) Rezūm water vapor thermal therapy for lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia: 4-year results from randomized controlled study. Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2018.12.041

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Woo HH, Chin PT, McNicholas TA, Gill HS, Plante MK, Bruskewitz RC, Roehrborn CG (2011) Safety and feasibility of the prostatic urethral lift: a novel, minimally invasive treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). BJU Int. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10342.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Franco JVA et al (2022) Minimally invasive treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a Cochrane network meta-analysis. BJU Int. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.15653

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Ng BHS, Chung E (2021) A state-of-art review on the preservation of sexual function among various minimally invasive surgical treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia: Impact on erectile and ejaculatory domains. Investig Clin Urol. https://doi.org/10.4111/icu.20200392

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Roehmholdt MJ, Bentley DF (2022) Large pelvic hematoma after UroLift® procedure for treatment of BPH with median lobe. Case Rep Urol. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7065865

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Rukstalis D et al (2019) Prostatic Urethral Lift (PUL) for obstructive median lobes: 12 month results of the MedLift Study. Prostate Cancer Prostat Dis. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-018-0118-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Carnevale FC et al (2020) Prostatic artery embolization for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia: 10 years’ experience. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020191249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ray AF et al (2018) Efficacy and safety of prostate artery embolization for benign prostatic hyperplasia: an observational study and propensity-matched comparison with transurethral resection of the prostate (the UK-ROPE study). BJU Int. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pisco JM et al (2016) Medium- and long-term outcome of prostate artery embolization for patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: results in 630 patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2016.04.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Svarc P, Taudorf M, Nielsen MB, Stroomberg HV, Røder MA, Lönn L (2020) Postembolization syndrome after prostatic artery embolization: a systematic review. Diagnostics. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10090659

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Pilan BF, de Assis AM, Moreira AM, de Rodrigues VCP, Carnevale FC (2022) Protection of nontarget structures in prostatic artery embolization. Radiol Bras. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2021.0021

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Bouza C, López T, Magro A, Navalpotro L, Amate JM (2006) Systematic review and meta-analysis of transurethral needle ablation in symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. BMC Urol. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-24906-14

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Albala DM et al (2002) Office-based transurethral microwave thermotherapy using the TherMatrx TMx-2000. J Endourol. https://doi.org/10.1089/089277902753483745

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Masood S, Djaladat H, Kouriefs C, Keen M, Palmer JH (2004) The 12-year outcome analysis of an endourethral wallstent for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia. BJU Int. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.05155.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chughtai B et al (2021) The iTind temporarily implanted nitinol device for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.12.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Porpiglia F et al (2019) Second-generation of temporary implantable nitinol device for the relief of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia: results of a prospective, multicentre study at 1 year of follow-up. BJU Int. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14608

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. JGP contributed to data collection and manuscript writing/editing. MCSA contributed to manuscript writing/editing. RBB contributed to data analysis and manuscript writing/editing. A Bhatia contributed to manuscript writing/editing. SB contributed to manuscript writing/editing. RS contributed to manuscript writing/editing. RM contributed to manuscript writing/editing. HNS contributed to project development, data management, and manuscript writing/editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hemendra N. Shah.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing financial interests for this study.

Ethics approval

It was not necessary for this study.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (XLSX 138 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Porto, J.G., Arbelaez, M.C.S., Blachman-Braun, R. et al. Complications associated with minimally invasive surgical therapies (MIST) for surgical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database review. World J Urol 41, 1975–1982 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04440-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04440-w

Keywords

Navigation