Data availability statement
There is no available data related to this article.
References
Raizenne BL, Zheng X, Oumedjbeur K, Mao J, Zorn KC, Elterman D, Bhojani N, McClure T, Te A, Kaplan S, Sedrakyan A, Chughtai B (2023) Prostatic artery embolization compared to transurethral resection of the prostate and prostatic urethral lift: a real-world population-based study. World J Urol 41(1):179–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-04218-6
Naidu SG, Narayanan H, Saini G, Segaran N, Alzubaidi SJ, Patel IJ, Oklu R (2021) Prostate artery embolization-review of indications, patient selection, techniques and results. J Clin Med. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10215139
Wu X, Zhou A, Heller M, Kohlbrenner R (2022) Prostatic artery embolization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a cost-effectiveness analysis. J Vasc Interv Radiol 33(12):1605–1615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2022.08.006
Funding
No grants or funding was provided for this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
ST, AM: project development, data collection, data analysis, manuscript writing and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares that they have no conflict of interest. Senol Tonyali has received a grant from European Association of Urology Scholarship Programme.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tonyali, S., Miernik, A. Prostatic artery embolization must be considered as a valid treatment option of benign prostatic hyperplasia particularly in patients having serious comorbidities. World J Urol 41, 1205–1206 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04315-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04315-0