Skip to main content
Log in

Are the use of fluoroquinolones in prostate biopsy prophylaxis returning? Comment on “antibiotic prophylaxis in patients who had undergone to prostate biopsy in between the EMA warning era: effects of fluoroquinolones in diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Results of an observational cohort study”

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The Original Article was published on 10 June 2022

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Liss MA, Taylor SA, Batura D et al (2014) Fluoroquinolone resistant rectal colonization predicts risk of infectious complications after transrectal prostate biopsy. J Urol 192:1673–1678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.06.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kisa E, Altug MU, Gurbuz OA et al (2017) Fosfomycin: a good alternative drug for prostate biopsy prophylaxis the results of a prospective, randomized trial with respect to risk factors. Int Braz J Urol 43(6):1068–1074. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2016.0619

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erdem Kisa.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kisa, E. Are the use of fluoroquinolones in prostate biopsy prophylaxis returning? Comment on “antibiotic prophylaxis in patients who had undergone to prostate biopsy in between the EMA warning era: effects of fluoroquinolones in diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Results of an observational cohort study”. World J Urol 40, 2583–2584 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-04113-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-04113-0

Navigation