Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Papillary puncture is still a routine puncture path

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The Original Article was published on 29 May 2020

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Xiao Bo, Zhang X, Wei-Guo Hu, Chen S, Li Y-H, Tang Y-Z, Liu Y-B, Li J-X (2015) Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy under total ultrasonography in patients aged less than 3 years: a single-center initial experience from China. Chin Med J 128(12):1596–1599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kallidonis P, Vagionis A, Vrettos T, Adamou K, Pagonis K, Ntasiotis P, Callas GA, Tanaseskou L, Al Aown AM, Liatsikos E (2020) Non papillary mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: early experience. World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03267-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sampaio FJ (1992) Review: anatomic background for intrarenal endourologic surgery. J Endourol 6(5):301–304. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.1992.6.301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tan H, Xie Y, Zhang X, Wang W, Yuan H, Lil C (2021) Assessment of three-dimensional reconstruction in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for complex renal calculi treatment. Front Surg. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.701207

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Campobasso D, Ferretti S, Frattini A (2019) Papillary puncture: still a good practice. World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2527-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No grants or funding was provided for this study.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Yong Luo, Ming Chen, Fang Ling Zhong, Hua Jian Su, Xiu Li Ou and Ming Lei contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, Kangda Road 1, Haizhu District, Guangzhou, 510230, Guangdong, China

    Yong Luo, Ming Chen, HuaJian Su, XiuYu Ou & Ming Lei

  2. Department of Spine Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

    FangLing Zhong

Authors
  1. Yong Luo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ming Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. FangLing Zhong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. HuaJian Su
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. XiuYu Ou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ming Lei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

LY conception and design of the work, drafting the manuscript. CM, ZFL, SHJ and OXL drafting of the manuscript. LM conception and design of the work, drafting the manuscript and revising critically for important intellectual content.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ming Lei.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by the author.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luo, Y., Chen, M., Zhong, F. et al. Papillary puncture is still a routine puncture path. World J Urol 40, 1255–1256 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-03961-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-03961-0

Search

Navigation