After an initial focus on the immediate respiratory implications of COVID19, its downstream effect on the practice of urology has rapidly become apparent. Urologists have been quick to recognise the ensuing challenges, that have ranged from prioritising patients who needed inpatient treatment when hospitals were under unprecedented pressure [1, 2], to adjustment of research so that it might potentially benefit those with COVID19 [3, 4], to ensuring that novel strategies for patient care and even medical education using digital technologies were implemented [5, 6].
Urologists as a group have been ideally placed to respond to these challenges. Experience with conditions that affect patients on a broad spectrum of severity , plus the development of extensive datasets that could then be assessed for the impact of COVID19  have enabled a measured and consequential assessment of how urologic care can be optimised during this uncertain time.
Urologists have proven capable of adjusting numerous aspects of patient care due to the impact of COVID19. While the ultimate cumulative effect of this virus upon those requiring  and offering  urologic care is still to be determined, the considered and significant research on this topic undertaken to date appears to have ensured that an overwhelming secondary impact upon both of these groups has been avoided. Thanks for this are due in no small part to those urologists who have pivoted their research to the topic of COVID19 in the absence of pre-existing funding for this purpose.
Heijkoop B, Galiabovitch E, York N et al (2020) Consensus of multiple national guidelines: agreed strategies for initial stone management during COVID-19. World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03491-7
Dotzauer R, Böhm K, Brandt MP et al (2020) Global change of surgical and oncological clinical practice in urology during early COVID-19 pandemic. World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03333-6
Qu LG, Perera M, Lawrentschuk N et al (2020) Scoping review: hotspots for COVID-19 urological research: what is being published and from where? World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03434-2
Desouky E (2021) BCG versus COVID-19: impact on urology. World J Urol 39:823–827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03251-7
Pinar U, Anract J, Perrot O et al (2021) Preliminary assessment of patient and physician satisfaction with the use of teleconsultation in urology during the COVID-19 pandemic. World J Urol 39:1991–1996. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03432-4
Gravas S, Ahmad M, Hernández-Porras A et al (2021) Impact of COVID-19 on medical education: introducing homo digitalis. World J Urol 39:1997–2003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03417-3
Klotz L, Pinthus J (2021) The ‘C’ Words: parallels and analogies between Prostate Cancer and Covid-19. World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03627-3
Mohamed NE, Benn EKT, Astha V et al (2021) Association between chronic kidney disease and COVID-19-related mortality in New York. World J Urol 39:2987–2993. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03567-4
Teoh JYC, Roupret M, Shariat SF et al (2021) Intravesical therapy for bladder cancer in the pandemic of Covid-19. World J Urol 39:1313–1314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03218-8
Abdessater M, Rouprêt M, Misrai V et al (2021) COVID-19 outbreak situation and its psychological impact among surgeons in training in France. World J Urol 39:971–972. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03207-x
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Bolton, D. COVID19: the response of the urologist. World J Urol 39, 3125 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03830-2