Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Five-alpha reductase inhibitors in men undergoing active surveillance for prostate cancer: impact on treatment and reclassification after 6 years follow-up

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the impact of 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs) on definitive treatment (DT) and pathological progression (PP) in patients on active surveillance (AS) for prostate cancer.

Methods

We identified 361 consecutive patients, from an IRB-approved database, on AS for prostate cancer with minimum 2 years follow-up. Patients were grouped into two cohorts, those using 5-ARIs (5-ARI; n = 119) or not using 5-ARIs (no 5-ARI; n = 242). Primary and secondary endpoints were treatment-free survival (TFS) and PP-free survival (PPFS), which were evaluated by Kaplan–Meier analysis. Univariate and multivariable cox regression analysis were used to identify predictors for PP and DT. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Baseline characteristics and the prostate biopsy rate were similar between the two groups. Median (range) follow-up was 5.7 (2.0–17.2) years. Five-year and 10-year TFS was 92% and 59% for the 5-ARI group versus 80% and 51% for the no 5-ARI group (p = 0.005), respectively. Five-year and 10-year PPFS was 77% and 41% for the 5-ARI group versus 70% and 32% for the no 5-ARI group (p = 0.04), respectively. Independent predictors for treatment and PP were not taking 5-ARIs (p = 0.005; p = 0.02), entry PSA > 2.5 ng/mL (p = 0.03; p = 0.01) and Gleason pattern 4 on initial biopsy (p < 0.001; p < 0.001), respectively. The main limitation is the retrospective study design.

Conclusions

5-ARIs reduces reclassification and cross-over to treatment in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer. Further, taking 5-ARIs was an independent predictor for prostate cancer progression and definitive treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

5-AR:

5-Alpha reductase

5-ARIs:

5-Alpha reductase inhibitors

DHT:

Dihydrotestosterone

DT:

Definitive treatment

LUTS:

Lower urinary tract symptoms

No 5-ARI:

Not using 5-ARIs

PP:

Pathological progression

PSA:

Prostate-specific antigen

References

  1. Cooperberg MR, Broering JM, Kantoff PW, Carroll PR (2007) Contemporary trends in low risk prostate cancer: risk assessment and treatment. J Urol 178:S14–S19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen RC, Rumble RB, Loblaw DA, Finelli A, Ehdaie B, Cooperberg MR et al (2016) Active surveillance for the management of localized prostate cancer (Cancer Care Ontario Guideline): American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Endorsement. J Clin Oncol 34:2182–2190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tosoian JJ, Carter HB, Lepor A, Loeb S (2016) Active surveillance for prostate cancer: current evidence and contemporary state of practice. Nat Rev Urol 13:205–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Richard PO, Finelli A (2014) 5-Alpha reductase inhibitors in active surveillance. Curr Opin Urol 24:324–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hamilton Z, Parsons JK (2016) Prostate cancer prevention: concepts and clinical trials. Curr Urol Rep 17:35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Thompson IM, Goodman PJ, Tangen CM, Lucia MS, Miller GJ, Ford LG et al (2003) The influence of finasteride on the development of prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 349:215–224

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Andriole GL, Bostwick DG, Brawley OW, Gomella LG, Marberger M, Montorsi F et al (2010) Effect of dutasteride on the risk of prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 362:1192–1202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dai C, Ganesan V, Zabell J, Nyame YA, Almassi N, Greene DJ et al (2018) Impact of 5alpha-reductase inhibitors on disease reclassification among men on active surveillance for localized prostate cancer with favorable features. J Urol 199:445–452

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Finelli A, Trottier G, Lawrentschuk N, Sowerby R, Zlotta AR, Radomski L et al (2011) Impact of 5alpha-reductase inhibitors on men followed by active surveillance for prostate cancer. Eur Urol 59:509–514

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fleshner NE, Lucia MS, Egerdie B, Aaron L, Eure G, Nandy I et al (2012) Dutasteride in localised prostate cancer management: the REDEEM randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 379:1103–1111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kearns JT, Faino AV, Schenk JM, Newcomb LF, Brooks JD, Carroll PR et al (2019) Continued 5alpha-reductase inhibitor use after prostate cancer diagnosis and the risk of reclassification and adverse pathological outcomes in the PASS. J Urol 201:106–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ozkan TA, Cebeci OO, Cevik I, Dillioglugil O (2018) Prognostic influence of 5 alpha reductase inhibitors in patients with localized prostate cancer under active surveillance. Turk J Urol 44:132–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ross AE, Feng Z, Pierorazio PM, Landis P, Walsh PC, Carter HB et al (2012) Effect of treatment with 5-alpha reductase inhibitors on progression in monitored men with favourable-risk prostate cancer. BJU Int 110:651–657

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Shelton PQ, Ivanowicz AN, Wakeman CM, Rydberg MG, Norton J, Riggs SB et al (2013) Active surveillance of very-low-risk prostate cancer in the setting of active treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia with 5alpha-reductase inhibitors. Urology 81:979–984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. D’Amico AV, Moul J, Carroll PR, Sun L, Lubeck D, Chen MH (2003) Cancer-specific mortality after surgery or radiation for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer managed during the prostate-specific antigen era. J Clin Oncol 21:2163–2172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. D’Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, Schultz D, Blank K, Broderick GA et al (1998) Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA 280:969–974

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Royce TJ, Hendrix LH, Stokes WA, Allen IM, Chen RC (2014) Cancer screening rates in individuals with different life expectancies. JAMA Intern Med 174:1558–1565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ukimura O, de Castro Abreu AL, Gill IS, Shoji S, Hung AJ, Bahn D (2013) Image visibility of cancer to enhance targeting precision and spatial mapping biopsy for focal therapy of prostate cancer. BJU Int 111:E354–E364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shoji S, Ukimura O, de Castro Abreu AL, Marien A, Matsugasumi T, Bahn D et al (2016) Image-based monitoring of targeted biopsy-proven prostate cancer on active surveillance: 11-year experience. World J Urol 34:221–227

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Washino S, Okochi T, Saito K, Konishi T, Hirai M, Kobayashi Y et al (2017) Combination of prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) score and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density predicts biopsy outcome in prostate biopsy naive patients. BJU Int 119:225–233

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Fujihara A, Iwata T, Shakir A, Tafuri A, Cacciamani GE, Gill K et al (2020) Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging facilitates reclassification during active surveillance for prostate cancer. BJU Intern

  22. Anderson JR, Cain KC, Gelber RD (1983) Analysis of survival by tumor response. J Clin Oncol 1:710–719

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Andriole GL, Humphrey P, Ray P, Gleave ME, Trachtenberg J, Thomas LN et al (2004) Effect of the dual 5alpha-reductase inhibitor dutasteride on markers of tumor regression in prostate cancer. J Urol 172:915–919

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Klotz L, Vesprini D, Sethukavalan P, Jethava V, Zhang L, Jain S et al (2015) Long-term follow-up of a large active surveillance cohort of patients with prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 33:272–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cooperberg MR, Cowan JE, Hilton JF, Reese AC, Zaid HB, Porten SP et al (2011) Outcomes of active surveillance for men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 29:228–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Morash C, Tey R, Agbassi C, Klotz L, McGowan T, Srigley J et al (2015) Active surveillance for the management of localized prostate cancer: guideline recommendations. Can Urol Assoc J 9:171–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dall’Era MA, Klotz L (2017) Active surveillance for intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 20:1–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Satkunasivam R, Kulkarni GS, Zlotta AR, Kalnin R, Trachtenberg J, Fleshner NE et al (2013) Pathological, oncologic and functional outcomes of radical prostatectomy following active surveillance. J Urol 190:91–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Huang CC, Kong MX, Zhou M, Rosenkrantz AB, Taneja SS, Melamed J et al (2014) Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer with minimal quantity of Gleason pattern 4 on needle biopsy is associated with low-risk tumor in radical prostatectomy specimen. Am J Surg Pathol 38:1096–1101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Goodman PJ, Tangen CM, Darke AK, Lucia MS, Ford LG, Minasian LM et al (2019) Long-term effects of finasteride on prostate cancer mortality. N Engl J Med 380:393–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Fleshner NE, Investigators Rt (2012) Dutasteride and active surveillance of low-risk prostate cancer. Lancet 379:1590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wong LM, Fleshner N, Finelli A (2013) Impact of 5-alpha reductase inhibitors on men followed by active surveillance for prostate cancer: a time-dependent covariate reanalysis. Eur Urol 64:343

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported in part by the CA205058-01 R01 grant from the National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute (ALA and ISG) and by the Australasian Urological Foundation (ANA).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study's conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by ANA, TS, AM, TC, SS, TI, AI, SC and ALA. The first draft of the manuscript was written by ANA, TS, ISG and ALA and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Andre Luis Abreu is consultant for Koelis and was proctor in training for Steba Biotech. Inderbir Gill is a non-paid consultant for Steba Biotech.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andre Luis Abreu.

Ethics declarations

Research involving human participants and/or animals (ethical approval)

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ashrafi, A.N., Shin, T., Marien, A. et al. Five-alpha reductase inhibitors in men undergoing active surveillance for prostate cancer: impact on treatment and reclassification after 6 years follow-up. World J Urol 39, 3295–3307 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03644-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03644-2

Keywords

Navigation