Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Contemporary role of palliative cystoprostatectomy or pelvic exenteration in advanced symptomatic prostate cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To access the feasibility of palliative cystoprostatectomy/pelvic exenteration in patients with bladder/rectal invasion due to prostate cancer (PC).

Patients and methods

Twenty-five men with cT4 PC were retrospectively identified in the institutional databases of six tertiary referral centers in the last decade. Local invasion was documented by CT or MRI scans and was confirmed by urethrocystoscopy. Oncological therapies, local symptoms, previous local treatments, time from diagnosis to intervention and type of surgical procedure were recorded. Patients were divided into groups: ADT group (12 pts) and 13 pts without any history of previous local/systemic treatments for PCa (nonADT groups). Perioperative complications were classified using the Clavien–Dindo system. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from surgery to death from any cause. A Cox regression analysis, stratified for ISUP score and previous hormonal treatment (ADT) was also performed for survival analysis.

Results

Ileal conduit was the main urinary diversion in both cohorts. For the entire cohort, complication rate was 44%. No significant differences regarding perioperative complications and complication severity between both subgroups were observed (p = 0.2). Median follow-up was 15 months (range 3–41) for the entire cohort with a median survival of 15 months (95% CI 10.1–19.9). In Cox regression analysis stratified for ISUP score, no statistically significant differences in OS in patients with and without previous ADT before cystectomy or exenteration were observed (HR 3.26, 95% CI 0.62–17.23, p = 0.164).

Conclusion

Palliative cystoprostatectomy and pelvic exenteration represent viable treatment options associated with acceptable morbidity and good short-term survival outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Leibovici D, Kamat AM, Pettaway CA, Pagliaro L, Rosser CJ, Logothetis C et al (2005) Cystoprostatectomy for effective palliation of symptomatic bladder invasion by prostate cancer. J Urol 174(6):2186–2190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Haidl F, Heidenreich A (2018) The significance of palliative surgery in castration-resistant prostate cancer. AktuelleUrol 49(5):405–411

    Google Scholar 

  3. Marguet C, Raj GV, Brashears JH, Anscher MS, Ludwig K, Mouraviev V et al (2007) Rectourethral fistula after combination radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Urology 69(5):898–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kimura M, Mouraviev V, Tsivian M, Mayes JM, Satoh T, Polascik TJ (2010) Current salvage methods for recurrent prostate cancer after failure of primary radiotherapy. BJU Int 105(2):191–201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zantl N, Gschwend JE (2008) Value of cystoprostatectomy in locally advanced prostate carcinoma. Urologe A 47(11):1447–1452

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kamat AM, Huang SF, Bermejo CE, Rosser CJ, Pettaway CA, Pisters PW et al (2003) Total pelvic exenteration: effective palliation of perineal pain in patients with locally recurrent prostate cancer. J Urol 170(5):1868–1871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Heidenreich A, Bludau M, Bruns C, Nestler T, Porres D, Pfister DJKP (2020) Pelvic exenteration surgery in patients with locally advanced castration-naïve and castration-resistant, symptomatic prostate cancer. BJU Int 126(3):342–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.15088

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pelletier J, Cyr SJ, Julien AS, Fradet Y, Lacombe L, Toren P (2018) Contemporary outcomes of palliative transurethral resection of the prostate in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer. UrolOncol. 36(8):363.e7-e11

    Google Scholar 

  9. Anastasiadis AG, Sachdev R, Salomon L, Ghafar MA, Stisser BC, Shabsigh R et al (2003) Comparison of health-related quality of life and prostate-associated symptoms after primary and salvage cryotherapy for prostate cancer. J Cancer Res ClinOncol 129(12):676–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lowrance WT, Elkin EB, Yee DS, Feifer A, Ehdaie B, Jacks LM et al (2012) Locally advanced prostate cancer: a population-based study of treatment patterns. BJU Int 109(9):1309–1314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ghadjar P, Briganti A, De Visschere PJ, Futterer JJ, Giannarini G, Isbarn H et al (2015) The oncologic role of local treatment in primary metastatic prostate cancer. World J Urol 33(6):755–761

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Spahn M, Morlacco A, Boxler S, Joniau S, Briganti A, Montorsi F et al (2017) Outcome predictors of radical cystectomy in patients with cT4 prostate cancer: a multi-institutional study of 62 patients. BJU Int 120(5B):E52–E58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sato K, Tsuchiya N, Habuchi T, Satoh S, Shimoda N, Kato T (2003) Total cystoprostatectomy in the treatment of locally advanced prostate carcinoma. AktuelleUrol 34(4):259–261

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kumazawa T, Tsuchiya N, Saito M, Inoue T, Narita S, Horikawa Y et al (2009) Cystoprostatectomy as a treatment of prostate cancer involving the bladder neck. UrolInt 83(2):141–145

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gheiler EL, Wood DP Jr, Montie JE, Pontes JE (1997) Orthotopic urinary diversion is a viable option in patients undergoing salvage cystoprostatectomy for recurrent prostate cancer after definitive radiation therapy. Urology 50(4):580–584

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bochner BH, Figueroa AJ, Skinner EC, Lieskovsky G, Petrovich Z, Boyd SD et al (1998) Salvage radical cystoprostatectomy and orthotopic urinary diversion following radiation failure. J Urol 160(1):29–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ward JF, Sebo TJ, Blute ML, Zincke H (2005) Salvage surgery for radiorecurrent prostate cancer: contemporary outcomes. J Urol 173(4):1156–1160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tolhurst SR, Rapp DE, O’Connor RC, Lyon MB, Orvieto MA, Steinberg GD (2005) Complications after cystectomy and urinary diversion in patients previously treated for localized prostate cancer. Urology 66(4):824–829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Leibovici D, Pagliaro L, Rosser CJ, Pisters LL (2005) Salvage surgery for bulky local recurrence of prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy. J Urol 173(3):781–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

Study conception and design: CS, CM, AK, IT, GG, VJ, IS, FM. Acquisition of data: CM, IT, HB, APL, GG, AK, IS. Analysis and interpretation of data: AK, AB, RM, MV, RCNB, DT, DR. Drafting of manuscript: CS, CM, AK, GG, RCNB, IH, DB, VJ. Critical revision: AK, GG, RCNB, HB, IH, IT, CM, IS.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Mirvald.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

Statement of human rights

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The present study is a retrospective one; for this type of study formal consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Surcel, C., Mirvald, C., Tsaur, I. et al. Contemporary role of palliative cystoprostatectomy or pelvic exenteration in advanced symptomatic prostate cancer. World J Urol 39, 2483–2490 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03493-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03493-5

Keywords

Navigation