Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Response to comment regarding article with title: ‘’does bipolar energy provide any advantage over monopolar surgery in transurethral resection of non-muscle invasive bladder tumors? A systematic review and meta-analysis’’

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The Original Article was published on 08 July 2020

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Sharma G, Tyagi S (2020) Does bipolar energy provide any advantage over monopolar surgery in transurethral resection of non-muscle invasive bladder tumors? A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03345-2

  2. Tzelves L, Mourmouris P, Skolarikos A (2020) Does bipolar energy provide any advantage over monopolar surgery in transurethral resection of non-muscle invasive bladder tumors? A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03313-w

  3. Sharma G, Sharma AP, Mavuduru RS et al (2020) Safety and efficacy of bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of bladder tumor: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03201-3

  4. Xie K, Cao D, Wei Q (2020) Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03271-3

  5. Anglemyer A, Horvath HT, Bero L (2014) Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:MR000034

    Google Scholar 

  6. Higgins JPT, Green S (eds). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. The Cochrane Collaboration. 2011. www.handbook.cochrane.org

  7. Murugavaithianathan P, Devana SK, Mavuduru R et al (2018) Bipolar transurethral resection of bladder tumor provides better tissue for histopathology but has no superior efficacy and safety: a randomized controlled trial. J Endourol 32(12):1125–1130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hashad MM, Abdeldaeim HM, Moussa A, Assem A, Youssif TMA (2017) Bipolar vs monopolar resection of bladder tumours of >3 cm in patients maintained on low-dose aspirin: a randomised clinical trial. Arab J Urol 15(3):223–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bălan GX, Geavlete PA, Georgescu DA et al (2018) Bipolar en bloc tumor resection versus standard monopolar TURBT: which is the best way to go in non-invasive bladder cancer? Roman J Morphol Embryol Revue Roum Morphol Embryol 59(3):773–780

    Google Scholar 

  10. Liem E, McCormack M, Chan ESY et al (2018) Monopolar vs. bipolar transurethral resection for non-muscle invasive bladder carcinoma: a post-hoc analysis from a randomized controlled trial. Urol Oncol 36(7):338 (e331-338.e311)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mahmoud MA, Tawfick A, Mostafa DE et al (2019) Can bipolar energy serve as an alternative to monopolar energy in the management of large bladder tumours >3 cm? A prospective randomised study. Arab J Urol 17(2):125–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Thirugnanasambandam V, Ramanathan J (2017) Safety and efficacy of bipolar energy for transurethral resection of bladder tumours: a prospective quasi-randomized study. Turk J Urol 43(2):141–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yılmaz Y, Kahya MC, Dilek FH, Köse O, Özcan S (2018) Can tumor recurrence be reduced with plasma-kinetic vaporization of the area around the tumor in nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer? Invest Clin Urol 59(4):223–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Balci M, Tuncel A, Keten T et al (2018) Comparison of monopolar and bipolar transurethral resection of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Urol Int 100(1):100–104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lazaros Tzelves.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

This study did not involve human participants and/or animals since it is a letter to the Editor regarding a systematic review/meta-analysis article.

Informed consent

This study did not involve human participants and/ or animals since it is a letter to the Editor regarding a systematic review/ meta-analysis article, thus no informed consent was required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tzelves, L., Mourmouris, P. & Skolarikos, A. Response to comment regarding article with title: ‘’does bipolar energy provide any advantage over monopolar surgery in transurethral resection of non-muscle invasive bladder tumors? A systematic review and meta-analysis’’. World J Urol 39, 4289–4290 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03396-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03396-5

Navigation