References
Sharma G, Tyagi S (2020) Does bipolar energy provide any advantage over monopolar surgery in transurethral resection of non-muscle invasive bladder tumors? A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03345-2
Tzelves L, Mourmouris P, Skolarikos A (2020) Does bipolar energy provide any advantage over monopolar surgery in transurethral resection of non-muscle invasive bladder tumors? A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03313-w
Sharma G, Sharma AP, Mavuduru RS et al (2020) Safety and efficacy of bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of bladder tumor: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03201-3
Xie K, Cao D, Wei Q (2020) Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03271-3
Anglemyer A, Horvath HT, Bero L (2014) Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:MR000034
Higgins JPT, Green S (eds). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. The Cochrane Collaboration. 2011. www.handbook.cochrane.org
Murugavaithianathan P, Devana SK, Mavuduru R et al (2018) Bipolar transurethral resection of bladder tumor provides better tissue for histopathology but has no superior efficacy and safety: a randomized controlled trial. J Endourol 32(12):1125–1130
Hashad MM, Abdeldaeim HM, Moussa A, Assem A, Youssif TMA (2017) Bipolar vs monopolar resection of bladder tumours of >3 cm in patients maintained on low-dose aspirin: a randomised clinical trial. Arab J Urol 15(3):223–227
Bălan GX, Geavlete PA, Georgescu DA et al (2018) Bipolar en bloc tumor resection versus standard monopolar TURBT: which is the best way to go in non-invasive bladder cancer? Roman J Morphol Embryol Revue Roum Morphol Embryol 59(3):773–780
Liem E, McCormack M, Chan ESY et al (2018) Monopolar vs. bipolar transurethral resection for non-muscle invasive bladder carcinoma: a post-hoc analysis from a randomized controlled trial. Urol Oncol 36(7):338 (e331-338.e311)
Mahmoud MA, Tawfick A, Mostafa DE et al (2019) Can bipolar energy serve as an alternative to monopolar energy in the management of large bladder tumours >3 cm? A prospective randomised study. Arab J Urol 17(2):125–131
Thirugnanasambandam V, Ramanathan J (2017) Safety and efficacy of bipolar energy for transurethral resection of bladder tumours: a prospective quasi-randomized study. Turk J Urol 43(2):141–146
Yılmaz Y, Kahya MC, Dilek FH, Köse O, Özcan S (2018) Can tumor recurrence be reduced with plasma-kinetic vaporization of the area around the tumor in nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer? Invest Clin Urol 59(4):223–231
Balci M, Tuncel A, Keten T et al (2018) Comparison of monopolar and bipolar transurethral resection of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Urol Int 100(1):100–104
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research involving human participants and/or animals
This study did not involve human participants and/or animals since it is a letter to the Editor regarding a systematic review/meta-analysis article.
Informed consent
This study did not involve human participants and/ or animals since it is a letter to the Editor regarding a systematic review/ meta-analysis article, thus no informed consent was required.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tzelves, L., Mourmouris, P. & Skolarikos, A. Response to comment regarding article with title: ‘’does bipolar energy provide any advantage over monopolar surgery in transurethral resection of non-muscle invasive bladder tumors? A systematic review and meta-analysis’’. World J Urol 39, 4289–4290 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03396-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03396-5