Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Predictive factors of urinary incontinence after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: a multicentric evaluation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate predictive factors of urinary incontinence (UI) after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP).

Methods

Patients (n = 2346) were included in a retrospective multicentric study from April 2012 to November 2017. Patients’ characteristics (age, BMI, percentage with diabetes), preoperative data (IPSS score, whole gland volume, urinary drainage), operative data (enucleation time, enucleation efficiency, tissue enucleated weight, total delivered energy) and postoperative data were recorded. Absence of UI was defined as no pads at 3 and 6 months. Surgeon experience was stratified in three categories: beginners (< 21 cases), intermediate (21–40 cases) and experienced (> 40 cases). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed.

Results

UI was observed in 14.5% of patients (340/2346) at 3 months (95%CI 13–16%) and in 4.2% (98/2346) at 6 months (95%CI 3–5%). On multivariate analysis at 3 months, increasing age (OR per SD = 1.3 [1.14–1.48]), elevated BMI (OR per SD = 1.23 [1.09–1.38]), preoperative urinary drainage (OR = 0.62 [0.45–0.85]), increasing enucleated tissue weight (OR per SD = 1.29 [1.16–1.45]) and experienced surgeon with at least 40 cases (OR = 0.56 [0.42–0.75]) were significantly associated with UI. At 6 months, increasing age (OR per SD = 1.25 [1.01–1.53]), elevated BMI (OR per SD = 1.25 [1.03–1.5]), increasing whole gland volume (OR per one SD log = 1.24 [1.01–1.53]) and diabetes disorder (OR = 1.7 [1.03–2.78]) were significantly associated with UI.

Conclusion

UI after HoLEP was observed in 14.5% of patients at 3 months and 4.2% at 6 months, with stress UI in half of the cases. Surgeon experience with at least 40 cases was the main predictive factor of 3 months UI after HoLEP and diabetes disorder of persistent UI at 6 months.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BPH:

Benign prostatic hyperplasia

BPO:

Benign prostatic obstruction

CI:

Confidence interval

EEP:

Endoscopic enucleation of the prostate

HoLEP:

Holmium laser enucleation of prostate

IPSS:

International Prostate Symptom Score

MUI:

Mixed urinary incontinence

OR:

Odds ratio

PSA:

Prostate-specific antigen

SD:

Standard deviation

SUI:

Stress urinary incontinence

TURP:

Transurethral resection of the prostate

UUI:

Urge urinary incontinence

UI:

Urinary incontinence

References

  1. Gratzke C, Bachmann A, Descazeaud A, Drake MJ, Madersbacher S, Mamoulakis C et al (2015) EAU guidelines on the assessment of non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms including benign prostatic obstruction. Eur Urol 67(6):1099–1109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cornu J-N, Ahyai S, Bachmann A, de la Rosette J, Gilling P, Gratzke C et al (2015) A systematic review and meta-analysis of functional outcomes and complications following transurethral procedures for lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from benign prostatic obstruction: an update. Eur Urol 67(6):1066–1096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Robert G, Cornu J-N, Fourmarier M, Saussine C, Descazeaud A, Azzouzi A-R et al (2016) Multicentre prospective evaluation of the learning curve of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). BJU Int 117(3):495–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Montorsi F, Naspro R, Salonia A, Suardi N, Briganti A, Zanoni M et al (2004) Holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate: results from a 2-center, prospective randomized trial in patients with obstructive benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 172(5):1926–1929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fujisaki A, Goto A, Endo F, Muraishi O, Hattori K, Yasumura S (2016) Practical index of urinary incontinence following holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: a case-series study of the 24-hour pad test immediately after catheter removal. Urol Int 97(3):310–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Elmansy HM, Kotb A, Elhilali MM (2011) Is there a way to predict stress urinary incontinence after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate? J Urol 186(5):1977–1981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nam JK, Kim HW, Lee DH, Han J-Y, Lee JZ, Park S-W (2015) Risk factors for transient urinary incontinence after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. World J Mens Health 33(2):88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shigemura K, Tanaka K, Yamamichi F, Chiba K, Fujisawa M (2006) Comparison of predictive factors for postoperative incontinence of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate by the surgeons’ experience during learning curve. Int Neurourol J 20(1):59–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shigemura K, Yamamichi F, Kitagawa K, Yamashita M, Oka Y, Tanaka H et al (2017) Does surgeon experience affect operative time, adverse events and continence outcomes in holmium laser enucleation of the prostate? A review of more than 1,000 cases. J Urol 198(3):663–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U et al (2002) The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 21(2):167–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rubin TH, D.B. (1990) Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. Stat Pap 31(1):180–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lerner LB, Tyson MD, Mendoza PJ (2010) Stress incontinence during the learning curve of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. J Endourol 24(10):1655–1658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Members of the Florey Adelaide Male Ageing Study, Martin SA, Haren MT, Marshall VR, Lange K, Wittert GA (2011) Prevalence and factors associated with uncomplicated storage and voiding lower urinary tract symptoms in community-dwelling Australian men. World J Urol 29(2):179–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yalcin S, Gazel E, Somani BK, Yilmaz S, Tunc L (2019) Prostate shape significantly affects the HoLEP procedure time and energy usage: a retrospective pilot study. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 28(4):220–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Naspro R, Suardi N, Salonia A, Scattoni V, Guazzoni G, Colombo R et al (2006) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus open prostatectomy for prostates > 70g: 24-month follow-up. Eur Urol 50(3):563–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Minagawa S, Okada S, Sakamoto H, Toyofuku K, Morikawa H (2015) En-Bloc technique with anteroposterior dissection holmium laser enucleation of the prostate allows a short operative time and acceptable outcomes. Urology 86(3):628–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Walz J, Epstein JI, Ganzer R, Graefen M, Guazzoni G, Kaouk J et al (2016) A critical analysis of the current knowledge of surgical anatomy of the prostate related to optimisation of cancer control and preservation of continence and erection in candidates for radical prostatectomy: an update. Eur Urol 70(2):301–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Endo F, Shiga Y, Minagawa S, Iwabuchi T, Fujisaki A, Yashi M et al (2010) Anteroposterior dissection HoLEP: a modification to prevent transient stress urinary incontinence. Urology 76(6):1451–1455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Saitta G, Becerra JEA, del Álamo JF, González LL, Elbers JR, Suardi N et al (2019) ‘En Bloc’ HoLEP with early apical release in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. World J Urol 37(11):2451–2458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jeong J, Lee HS, Cho WJ, Jung W, You HW, Kim TH et al (2015) Effect of detrusor overactivity on functional outcomes after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate in patients with benign prostatic obstruction. Urology 86(1):133–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Placer J, Gelabert-Mas A, Vallmanya F, Manresa JM, Menéndez V, Cortadellas R et al (2009) Holmium laser enucleation of prostate: outcome and complications of self-taught learning curve. Urology 73(5):1042–1048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chang PL, Tsai LH, Huang ST, Wang TM, Hsieh ML, Tsui KH (1998) The early effect of pelvic floor muscle exercise after transurethral prostatectomy. J Urol 160(2):402–405

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

VH: project development and manuscript writing; JO, ML: manuscript writing; MB: data collection; AP: data analysis; MM, PET, HB, RM and TM: data collection or management; AV, GR and JR: project development and manuscript writing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan Olivier.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

V. Houssin, J. Olivier, M. Brenier, A. Pierache, M. Laniado, M. Mouton, T. Marquette, A.Villers declare that they have no conflict of interest. PE. Theveniaud, H. Baumert, R. Mallet, G. Robert, J. Rizk: HOLEP proctor for EDAP/TMS.

Informed consent

All participants have given informed consent before inclusion in the present study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 88 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Houssin, V., Olivier, J., Brenier, M. et al. Predictive factors of urinary incontinence after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: a multicentric evaluation. World J Urol 39, 143–148 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03169-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03169-0

Keywords

Navigation