Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

TUR-P phantom for resident surgical training: food-based design as a human mimicking model of the prostate

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study would like to develop a novel model similar to human prostate in terms of its texture profile, sensation upon resection, and anatomical hallmarks for resident transurethral resection of the prostate (TUR-P) training.

Methods

Ten phantom designs were proposed, using broadly available ingredients and a homemade protocol. Three steps of evaluation and development were done: objective measurement measuring texture profile (e.g. hardness, elasticity, cohesiveness/consistency, and adhesiveness/stickiness) using TA-XT2i Texture Analyzer (Llyod Instruments, Ametek Inc) to compare the designs with human prostate, finding the most similar design to prostate; expert consensus by a panel of urologist/senior residents comparing the simulation of TUR-P on the selected design with pre-existing control phantom; and anatomical design development using 3D printing for molding.

Results

Texture profile analysis for mean hardness, elasticity, cohesiveness/consistency, and adhesiveness/stickiness of human prostate was 3753.4 ± 673.4, 85 ± 1.9, 0.7 ± 0.03, and 0, respectively, and design IX was the most similar to human prostate (3660.7 ± 465.6, 87.0 ± 2.5, 0.6 ± 0.05, 0). Furthermore, expert consensus showed superiority of design IX compared with pre-existing control phantom (16.95 ± 1.36 vs 8.86 ± 3.10; P < 0.001). Most of the respondents agreed that the texture, consistency, and phantom ability to mimic human prostate upon resection were similar with human prostate, though hallmarks of the prostate e.g. veromontanum, and lobes were lacking. We used these feedbacks to develop a mold, designed to produce these important anatomical hallmarks.

Conclusion

This study developed a cost-effective prostate model from a food-based design that is similar to human prostate in terms of its texture and sensation upon TUR-P resection provided with important anatomical hallmarks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tjahdojati, Soebadi DM, Umbas R, Purnomo BB, Widjanarko S, Mochtar CA et al (2017) Panduan penatalaksanaan klinis: pembesaran prostat jinak (benign prostatic hyperplasia/BPH). Ikatan Ahli Urologi Indonesia

  2. Brewin J, Ahmed K, Khan MS, Jaye P, Dasgupta P (2014) Face, content, and construct validation of the Bristol TURP trainer. J Surg Educ 71(4):500–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kapadia MR, Da-Rosa DA, Mac-Rae HM, Dunnington GL (2007) Current assessment and future directions of surgical skills laboratories. J Surg Educ 64(5):260–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Matsumoto ED, Hamstra SJ, Radomski SB, Cusimano MD (2001) A novel approach to endourological training: training at the surgical skills center. J Urol 166:1261–1266

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Niessen WJ, Viergever MA (2001) Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention—MICCAI 2001. In: The forth international conference Proceedings. Springer, Utrecht, pp 360–367

  6. Burdea G, Patounakis G, Popescu V, Weiss RE (1999) Virtual reality-based training for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 46(10):1253–1260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tjiam IM, Berkers CH, Schout BM, Brinkman WM, Witjes JA, Scherpbier AJ et al (2014) Evaluation of the educational value of a virtual reality TURP simulator according to a curriculum-based approach. Simul Healthc 9(5):288–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Källström R, Hjertberg H, Kjölhede H, Svanvik J (2005) Use of a virtual reality, real-time, simulation model for the training of urologists in transurethral resection of the prostate. Scand J Urol Nephrol 39(4):313–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bach T, Geavlete B, Herrmann TRW, Gross AJ (2009) Homemade” TUR-simulator for less than $40 U.S.? The “TupperTM” experience. J Endourol 23(3):509–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Khan R, Aydin A, Khan MS, Dasgupta P, Ahmed K (2015) Simulation-based training for prostate surgery. BJU Int 116(4):665–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ahmad S, Byrne D, Ghulam N (2013) Training model for transurethral resection of prostate using human cadavers embalmed by Thiel's method. Videourology. https://doi.org/10.1089/vid.2013.0026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hou S, Ross G, Tait I, Halliday P, Tang B (2017) Development and validation of a novel and cost-effective animal tissue model for training transurethral resection of the prostate. J Surg Educ 74(5):898–905

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sweet R, Porter J, Oppenheimer P et al (2002) Simulation of bleeding in endoscopic procedures using virtual reality. J Endourol 16:451–455

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ben-Zvi T, Hueber PA, Valdivieso R, Azzizi M, Tholomier C, Bienz M et al (2015) Urological resident exposure to transurethral surgical options for BPH management in 2012–2013: a pan-Canadian survey. Can Urol Assoc J 9(3–4):E236

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There is no external funding done for this study. All expenses were covered by the institution and authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

NR: project design, project development, data collection, and manuscript writing. HWKP: data collection and manuscript writing. PB: manuscript writing and supervision. IW: data collection and supervision. CAM: data analysis and supervision. ARAHH: project design, supervision, and manuscript editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Agus Rizal A. H. Hamid.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statement of human rights

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee (The Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Indonesia; Ethical Approval number 0224/UN2.F1/ETIK/2018) and with the 1964 Helsinski declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rasyid, N., Putra, H.W.K., Birowo, P. et al. TUR-P phantom for resident surgical training: food-based design as a human mimicking model of the prostate. World J Urol 38, 2907–2914 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03085-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03085-3

Keywords

Navigation