Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Management of pelvic fracture urethral injuries in the developing world

  • Topic Paper
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Pelvic fracture causes urethral injury in about 10% of patients. The etiology of injury is different in developing and developed world. While high-velocity automobile accidents are common in developed countries, where patients are in the car and there is usually a side impact, in the developing world, significant number of injuries are caused by two-wheeler accidents, pedestrians, farming accidents, fall from height, fall from tractor, fall from tree, and other causes like earthquake. We share our experience which is the largest in the reported literature.

Materials and methods

In our tertiary referral center, we get referrals from all across the globe. Since 1995 till 2018 we have performed 1307 surgeries for Pelvic fracture urethral injury. Our referrals are for complex urethroplasty. Our data from 1995–2018 was analyzed. Data after June 2018 was not included so as to have a minimum follow up of 6 months.

Results

1296 patients were males and 11 were females. In the group of 1296 males, mean age was 32.4 years (range 1–79 years). The minimum follow-up was 6 months, and the median follow-up was 56.7 months (range 6.2–233.7). The overall success rate was 88.79% for primary cases while re-do urethroplasty patients had a success rate of 83.70%. The majority of our patients (more than 61.40%) needed inferior pubectomy: Of the total 1307 cases of urethroplasty for pelvic fracture urethral injury data was available for 1042 patients. Data were available for 1042 patients. The data from 2012 onwards were prospectively analyzed while the previous data were retrospectively analyzed.

Conclusion

PFUI are common in the developing world. They tend to be more complex and have longer gaps as compared to developed world. This could be related to the anthropometric differences between races as well as nature of injury. They are best managed with delayed transperineal repair with excellent outcomes. Ancillary maneuvers are more frequently required. Re-do urethroplasty can achieve good results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

PFUI:

Pelvic fracture urethral injury

AUA:

American Urology Association

RGU:

Retrograde urethrogram

VCUG:

Voiding cyst urethrography

SPC:

Suprapubic catheter

3D:

Three dimensional

DVIU:

Direct visual internal urethrotomy

ICUD:

International consultation on urology diseases

References

  1. Jordan GH, Virasoro R, Eltahawy EA (2006) Reconstruction and management of posterior urethral and sraddle injuries of the urethra. Urol Clin N Am 33:97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kulkarni SB, Barbagli G, Kulkarni JS et al (2010) Posterior urethral stricture after pelvic fracture urethral distraction defects in developing and developed countries, and choice of surgical technique. J Urol 183:1049–1054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barbagli G (2007) History and evolution of transpubic urethroplasty: a lesson for young urologists in training. Eur Urol 52:1290–1292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. WHO Global Status Report on Road Safety (2009). http://www.who.int/roadsafety

  5. Male urethral stricture AUA guidelines (2016)

  6. EAU guidelines on urological trauma (2016)

  7. Zuckerman JM, McCammon KA, Tisdale BE et al (2012) Outcome of penile revascularization for arteriogenic erectile dysfunction after pelvic fracture urethral injuries. Urology 80:1373e1374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Morey AF, McAninch JW (1997) Reconstruction of posterior urethral disruption injuries: outcome analysis in 82 patients. J Urol 157:506

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Flynn BJ, Delvecchio FC, Webster GD (2003) Perineal repair of pelvic fracture urethral distraction defects: experience in 120 patients during the last 10 years. J Urol 170:1877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Koraitim MM (2005) On the art of anastomotic posterior urethroplasty: a 27-year experience. J Urol 173:135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Webster GD, Ramon J (1991) Repair of pelvic fracture posterior urethral defects using an elaborated perineal approach: experience with 74 cases. J Urol 145:744

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Koraitim MM (1997) Posttraumatic posterior urethral strictures in children: a 20-year experience. J Urol 157:641

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Singh SK, Pawar DS, Khandelwal AK et al (2010) Transperineal bulboprostatic anastomotic repair of pelvic fracture urethral distraction defect and role of ancillary maneuver: a retrospective study in 172 patients. Urol Ann 2:53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Koraitim MM (1999) Pelvic fracture urethral injuries: the unresolved controversy. J Urol 161:1433

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pokorny M, Pontes JE, Pierce JM (1979) Urological injuries associated with pelvic trauma. J Urol 121:455

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Andrich DE, Mundy AR (2001) The nature of urethral injury in cases of pelvic fracture urethral trauma. J Urol 165:1492

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kizer WS, Armenakas NA, Brandes SB et al (2007) Simplified reconstruction of posterior urethral disruption defects: limited role of supracrural rerouting. J Urol 177:1378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Krishnamoorthy V, Joshi PB (2012) Length of urethra in the Indian adult male population. Indian J Urol 28:297–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kohler TS, Yadven M, Manvar A et al (2008) The length of the male urethra. Int Braz J Urol 34:451–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kulkarni SB (2009) Does penile length affect surgical steps and outcome of posterior urethroplasty? The Indian experience. In: Presented at annual meeting of American Urological Association, Chicago, Illinois, April 25–30

  21. Koraitim MM (2008) Gapometry and anterior urethrometry in the repair of posterior urethral defects. J Urol 179:1879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kulkarni Sanjay B, Surana Sandesh, Desai Devang J, Orabi Hazem, Dumawat Ajit, Joshi Pankaj M (2018) Management of complex and redo cases of pelvic fracture urethral injuries. Asian J Urol 5(2):107–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kulkarni S, Joshi P, Hunter C et al (2015) Complex posterior urethral injury. Arab J Urol 13:43–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Shreyas Bhadranavar, Shrikant Jai, Amar Rawal, Ayman Mousa for helping in data collection. Shrivallabh Sane for data analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

PMJ: protocol/project development, data collection or management, data analysis, manuscript writing/editing. SBK: protocol/project development, data analysis, manuscript writing/editing

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pankaj M. Joshi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

None.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Joshi, P.M., Kulkarni, S.B. Management of pelvic fracture urethral injuries in the developing world. World J Urol 38, 3027–3034 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02918-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02918-0

Keywords

Navigation