Skip to main content
Log in

Lessons learned from clinical outcome and tumor features of patients underwent selective artery embolization due to postoperative bleeding following 2076 partial nephrectomies: propensity scoring matched study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the clinical and tumor characteristics in patients undergoing selective artery embolization (SAE) for bleeding after partial nephrectomy (PN).

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated patients who underwent SAE from 2076 patients who underwent PN. The clinical and tumor characteristics of these patients were analyzed using entire data and propensity score matching (PSM). 76 patients who underwent PN (control, n = 38 patients; SAE, n = 38) were enrolled in PSM.

Results

SAE was performed in 41 patients who underwent open (19/1171), laparoscopic (4/60), and robot-assisted PN (18/845). The median period from PN to SAE was 12 days (interquartile range 8–24 day). The most common symptom of 31 (75.61%) patients was gross hematuria, followed by flank pain (3/41). Follow-up imaging revealed large pseudoaneurysm in 7 asymptomatic patients. The main reason for SAE on angiography was pseudoaneurysm (32/41), followed by arteriovenous fistula (5/41). Technical and clinical success was achieved in all patients. There was no statistical difference in the estimated glomerular filtration rate after 1 year, surgical methods, or baseline characteristics between the two groups. Conversely, there was statistically significant difference in ischemic time in the entire data and PSM. In the embolization group, renal masses showed statistically significant endophytic (p = 0.006) and posterior (p = 0.028) characteristics.

Conclusions

SAE is an effective method for controlling postoperative bleeding while preserving renal function after PN. And, we suggest more attentive postoperative surveillance about vascular complications in patients with longer ischemia time or renal masses with endophytic and posterior locations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Huang WC, Atoria CL, Bjurlin M, Pinheiro LC, Russo P, Lowrance WT, Elkin EB (2015) Management of small kidney cancers in the new millennium: contemporary trends and outcomes in a population-based cohort. JAMA Surg 150:664–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Benway BM, Bhayani SB, Rogers CG, Porter JR, Buffi NM, Figenshau RS, Mottrie A (2010) Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: an international experience. Eur Urol 57:815–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zargar H, Bhayani S, Allaf ME, Stifelman M, Rogers C, Larson J, Ball MW, Marshall S, Kumar R, Fergany A, Campbell S, Kaouk J (2014) Comparison of perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy and open partial nephrectomy in patients with a solitary kidney. J Endourol 28:1224–1230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hennessey DB, Wei G, Moon D, Kinnear N, Bolton DM, Lawrentschuk N, Chan YK (2018) Strategies for success: a multi-institutional study on robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for complex renal lesions. BJU Int 121(Suppl 3):40–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gill IS, Kavoussi LR, Lane BR, Blute ML, Babineau D, Colombo JR Jr, Frank I, Permpongkosol S, Weight CJ, Kaouk JH, Kattan MW, Novick AC (2007) Comparison of 1,800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors. J Urol 178:41–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jain S, Nyirenda T, Yates J, Munver R (2013) Incidence of renal artery pseudoaneurysm following open and minimally invasive partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and comparative analysis. J Urol 189:1643–1648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Singh D, Gill IS (2005) Renal artery pseudoaneurysm following laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Urol 174:2256–2259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hyams ES, Pierorazio P, Proteek O, Sukumar S, Wagner AA, Mechaber JL, Rogers C, Kavoussi L, Allaf M (2011) Iatrogenic vascular lesions after minimally invasive partial nephrectomy: a multi-institutional study of clinical and renal functional outcomes. Urology 78:820–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Stephenson AJ, Hakimi AA, Snyder ME, Russo P (2004) Complications of radical and partial nephrectomy in a large contemporary cohort. J Urol 171:130–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nouhaud FX, Williams M, Arnfield E, Perera ML, Cho J, Esler R, Coughlin G (2018) Is postoperative Doppler ultrasonography useful for the early detection of asymptomatic pseudoaneurysm and prevention of haemorrhagic complications after partial nephrectomy? BJU Int 122(Suppl 5):15–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ghoneim TP, Thornton RH, Solomon SB, Adamy A, Favaretto RL, Russo P (2011) Selective arterial embolization for pseudoaneurysms and arteriovenous fistula of renal artery branches following partial nephrectomy. J Urol 185:2061–2065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chavali JSS, Bertolo R, Kara O, Garisto J, Mouracade P, Nelson RJ, Dagenais J, Kaouk JH (2019) Renal arterial pseudoaneurysm after partial nephrectomy: literature review and single-center analysis of predictive factors and renal functional outcomes. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 29:45–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jeon CH, Seong NJ, Yoon CJ, Byun SS, Lee SE (2016) Clinical results of renal artery embolization to control postoperative hemorrhage after partial nephrectomy. Acta Radiol Open 5:2058460116655833

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Canter D, Kutikov A, Manley B, Egleston B, Simhan J, Smaldone M, Teper E, Viterbo R, Chen DY, Greenberg RE, Uzzo RG (2011) Utility of the RENAL nephrometry scoring system in objectifying treatment decision-making of the enhancing renal mass. Urology 78:1089–1094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Netsch C, Bruning R, Bach T, Gross AJ (2010) Management of renal artery pseudoaneurysm after partial nephrectomy. World J Urol 28:519–524

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Shakhssalim N, Nouralizadeh A, Soltani MH (2010) Renal artery pseudoaneurysm following a laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: hemorrhage after a successful embolization. Urol J 7:12–14

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zelenak K, Sopilko I, Svihra J, Kliment J (2009) Successful embolization of a renal artery pseudoaneurysm with arteriovenous fistula and extravasations using Onyx after partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 32:163–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kang SH, Rhew HY, Kim TS (2013) Changes in renal function after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison with laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. Korean J Urol 54:22–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Adamy A, Favaretto RL, Nogueira L, Savage C, Russo P, Coleman J, Guillonneau B, Touijer K (2010) Recovery of renal function after open and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 58:596–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Scharnweber T, Alhilali L, Fakhran S (2017) Contrast-induced acute kidney injury: pathophysiology, manifestations, prevention, and management. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 25:743–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ohno Y, Maekawa Y, Miyata H, Inoue S, Ishikawa S, Sueyoshi K, Noma S, Kawamura A, Kohsaka S, Fukuda K (2013) Impact of periprocedural bleeding on incidence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol 62:1260–1266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Volpe A, Blute ML, Ficarra V, Gill IS, Kutikov A, Porpiglia F, Rogers C, Touijer KA, Van Poppel H, Thompson RH (2015) Renal ischemia and function after partial nephrectomy: a collaborative review of the literature. Eur Urol 68:61–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ficarra V, Novara G, Artibani W, Cestari A, Galfano A, Graefen M, Guazzoni G, Guillonneau B, Menon M, Montorsi F, Patel V, Rassweiler J, Van Poppel H (2009) Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol 55:1037–1063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Maurice MJ, Kaouk JH, Ramirez D, Bhayani SB, Allaf ME, Rogers CG, Stifelman MD (2017) Robotic partial nephrectomy for posterior tumors through a retroperitoneal approach offers decreased length of stay compared with the transperitoneal approach: a propensity-matched analysis. J Endourol 31:158–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DYC (protocol/project development, manuscript writing, statistical analysis). JSL (data collection or management, manuscript writing). AA (data collection or management). KdC (data analysis). WSH (data analysis, data collection or management). WKH (manuscript editing). CHH (manuscript editing). YDC (manuscript editing). KHR (manuscript editing, protocol/project development).

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Koon Ho Rha.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical statement

The current research was approved by the Severance Hospital institutional review board (protocol number 4-2018-1126).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chung, D.Y., Lee, J.S., Ahmad, A. et al. Lessons learned from clinical outcome and tumor features of patients underwent selective artery embolization due to postoperative bleeding following 2076 partial nephrectomies: propensity scoring matched study. World J Urol 38, 1235–1242 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02883-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02883-8

Keywords

Navigation