Abstract
Purpose
Fluoroscopy is valuable in modern endourology. We present the results of a survey where compliance to radiation safety measures was tested according to surgical exposure, and level of understanding of the radiation rules and risks associated with it.
Methods
A 52-item, anonymous questionnaire, structured by 6 ESUT/EULIS experts was distributed at 3 different endourological meetings during 2017–2018. Main aim was to evaluate level of knowledge on radiation physics and the protective measures taken against radiation exposure by participants. Fisher’s exact test, Kruskal–Wallis test and ROC curve were used for statistical analysis.
Results
211 responses were evaluated. Number of correct answers (median 7.00) differed significantly according to age (p = 0.001), working position (p = 0.005), working field (p < 0.001), number of semirigid (p < 0.001)/flexible URS (p < 0.001) and PNL (p < 0.001) performed per year. Physicians aged 50–60 years, consultants, academics and those who performed more procedures achieved higher scores. In our study 51.7% of responders used shields in the operating room, 89.6% wore lead aprons, 84.4% thyroid shields, while glasses and gloves were used by 14.7% and 8.1%, respectively. Age, working field and number of correct answers did not affect significantly the use of protection in contrast with endourology fellowship training, working position and lessons on radiation. Interestingly, residents, untrained endourologists and those who were provided with lessons on radiation were more compliant.
Conclusions
Our study revealed that majority of modern urologists advocate radiation protection during endourology practice. Senior consultants and academic urologists performing a high volume of procedures seem to understand physics and rules of radiation use.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00345-019-02807-6/MediaObjects/345_2019_2807_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00345-019-02807-6/MediaObjects/345_2019_2807_Fig2_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- PNL:
-
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy
- URS:
-
Ureteroscopy
- CT:
-
Computed tomography
- KUB:
-
Kidney–ureter–bladder
- IVP:
-
Intravenous pyelography
- SWL:
-
Shockwave lithotripsy
- ALARA:
-
As low as reasonably achievable
- mSV:
-
Millisievert
- mA:
-
Milliamper
- ESUT:
-
EAU section of uro-technology
- EULIS:
-
EAU section of urolithiasis
- ROC:
-
Receiver operating characteristic
- CI:
-
Confidence interval
- y/o:
-
Years old
- BMI:
-
Body mass index
- RIRS:
-
Retrograde intrarenal surgery
References
Busch U (2011) 110 years ago: Wilhelm Conrad Roentgen received the first Nobel Prize. Z Med Phys 21(3):159–160
Bury RF (2002) Radiation hazards in urological practice. BJU Int 89(6):505–509
Hall EJ (1988) Radiobiology for the radiologist, 3rd edn. Lippincott, Philadelphia
Perisinakis K, Damilakis J, Theocharopoulos N et al (2001) Accurate assessment of patient effective radiation dose and associated detriment risk from radiofrequency catheter ablation procedures. Circulation 104:58–62
Theocharopoulos N, Damilakis J, Perisinakis K et al (2006) Occupational exposure in the electrophysiology laboratory: quantifying and minimizing radiation burden. Br J Radiol 79:644–651
Goldstein JA, Balter S, Cowley M et al (2004) Occupational hazards of interventional cardiologists: prevalence of orthopedic health problems in contemporary practice. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 63(4):407–411
da Castane WR, Esperan GD (2007) How to protect yourself and others from radiation. In: Smith AD (ed) Smith’s textbook of endourology, 2nd edn. BC Decker Inc., Lewiston, pp 11–14
Felmlee JP, McGough PF, Morin RL et al (1991) Hand dose measurements in interventional radiology. Health Phys 60(2):265–267
Shiralkar S, Rennie A, Snow M et al (2003) Doctors’ knowledge of radiation exposure: questionnaire study. BMJ 327(7411):371–372
Bagley DH, Cubler-Goodman A (1990) Radiation exposure during ureteroscopy. J Urol 144(6):1356–1358
Giblin JG, Rubenstein J, Taylor A et al (1996) Radiation risk to the urologist during endourologic procedures, and a new shield that reduces exposure. Urology 48(4):624–627
Elkoushy MA, Andonian S (2011) Prevalence of orthopedic complaints among endourologists and their compliance with radiation safety measures. J Endourol 25(10):1609–1613
Kocher KE, Meurer WJ, Fazel R et al (2011) National trends in use of computed tomography in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 58(5):452–462.e3
Pauwels EK, Bourguignon M (2011) Cancer induction caused by radiation due to computed tomography: a critical note. Acta Radiol 52(7):767–773
Lawrence T, Rosenberg S (eds) (2008) Cancer: principles and practice of oncology. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia
Reisz JA, Bansal N, Qian J et al (2014) Effects of ionizing radiation on biological molecules–mechanisms of damage and emerging methods of detection. Antioxid Redox Signal 21(2):260–292
Mettler FA Jr, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT et al (2008) Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology 248(1):254–263
Pfister SA, Deckart A, Laschke S et al (2003) Unenhanced helical computed tomography vs intravenous urography in patients with acute flank pain: accuracy and economic impact in a randomized prospective trial. Eur Radiol 13(11):2513–2520
Tamm EP, Silverman PM, Shuman WP (2003) Evaluation of the patient with flank pain and possible ureteral calculus. Radiology 228(2):319–329
Stabin M et al (1992) Radiation-dosimetry for technetium-99m-MAG3, technetium-99m-DTPA, and iodine-131-OIH based on human biodistribution studies. J Nucl Med 33(1):33–40
Soye JA, Paterson A (2008) A survey of awareness of radiation dose among health professionals in Northern Ireland. Br J Radiol 81(969):725–729
Tse V, Lising J, Khadra M et al (1999) Radiation exposure during fluoroscopy: should we be protecting our thyroids? Aust N Z J Surg 69(12):847–848
Synowitz M, Kiwit J (2006) Surgeon’s radiation exposure during percutaneous vertebroplasty. J Neurosurg Spine 4(2):106–109
Reagan JT, Slechta AM (2010) Factors related to radiation safety practices in California. Radiol Technol 81(6):538–547
Devalia KL, Peter VK, Madanur MA et al (2006) Exposure of the thyroid to radiation during routine orthopaedic procedures. Acta Orthop Belg 72(5):615–620
Söylemez H, Sancaktutar AA, Silay MS et al (2013) Knowledge and attitude of European urology residents about ionizing radiation. Urology 81(1):30–35
Moore B, vanSonnenberg E, Casola G et al (1992) The relationship between back pain and lead apron use in radiologists. AJR Am J Roentgenol 158(1):191–193
Boeri L, Gallioli A, De Lorenzis E et al (2018) Impact of surgical experience on radiation exposure during retrograde intrarenal surgery: a propensity-score matching analysis. Eur Urol Focus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2018.08.028
Sfoungaristos S, Lorber A, Gofrit ON et al (2015) Surgical experience gained during an endourology fellowship program may affect fluoroscopy time during ureterorenoscopy. Urolithiasis 43:369–374
Weld LR, Nwoye UO, Knight RB et al (2015) Fluoroscopy time during uncomplicated unilateral ureteroscopy for urolithiasis decreases with urology resident experience. World J Urol 33:119–124
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
LT: protocol/project development, data collection/management, data analysis, and manuscript writing. BS: protocol/project development, data collection/management, data analysis, and manuscript writing. TK: protocol/project development, data collection/management, data analysis, and manuscript writing. GK: protocol/project development, data collection/management, data analysis, and manuscript writing. KS: protocol/project development, data collection/management, data analysis, and manuscript writing. CS: protocol/project development, data collection/management, data analysis, and manuscript writing. EL: protocol/project development, data collection/management, data analysis, and manuscript writing. SA: protocol/project development, data collection/management, data analysis, and manuscript writing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tzelves, L., Somani, B., Knoll, T. et al. Level of knowledge on radiation exposure and compliance to wearing protective equipment: where do endourologists stand? An ESUT/EULIS survey. World J Urol 38, 761–768 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02807-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02807-6