The introduction of robotic surgical technology into urological reconstruction, particularly pediatrics, has introduced new horizons for reducing the morbidity and enhancing the efficacy of surgical repair of congenital conditions in children. In reviewing the evolution of pediatric urological applications of robotic surgery, we wanted to address the different levels of reported utilization of pyeloplasty and ureteral reimplantation as two of the most common procedures.
Review of the published literature sought to explore the described variation in clinical application of these two common procedures, and the evolution of the practice over time.
Reported outcomes suggest that variations in patient selection, the learning curve and in reporting of outcomes all contribute to the wide variation in utilization of pediatric robotic pyeloplasty and ureteral reimplantation.
These technologies are demonstrating their potential as well as the challenges of use in children and there is a steady evolution of capability. Practitioners should be aware of both the possibilities as well as the risks of such new technology in the care of our patients. This requires thorough and open reporting of outcomes, the willingness to introduce change and integrate new findings into practice.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Peters CA (2004) Robotically assisted surgery in pediatric urology. Urol Clin N Am 31(4):743–752
Howe A, Kozel Z, Palmer L (2017) Robotic surgery in pediatric urology. Asian J Urol 4(1):55–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2016.06.002(Epub 2016 Sep 6. Review)
Finkelstein JB, Levy AC, Silva MV, Murray L, Delaney C, Casale P (2015) How to decide which infant can have robotic surgery? Just do the math. J Pediatr Urol 11(4):170.e1–170.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.11.020(Epub 2015 Mar 4)
Bowen DK, Faasse MA, Liu DB, Gong EM, Lindgren BW, Johnson EK (2016) Use of pediatric open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation in the United States: 2000–2012. J Urol 196(1):207–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.065(Epub 2016 Feb 13)
Cortesi N, Ferrari P, Zambarda E, Manenti A, Baldini A, Morano FP (1976) Diagnosis of bilateral abdominal cryptorchidism by laparoscopy. Endoscopy 8(1):33–34
Koyle MA, Woo HH, Kavoussi LR (1993) Laparoscopic nephrectomy in the first year of life. J Pediatr Surg 28(5):693–695
Van Batavia JP, Casale P (2014) Robotic surgery in pediatric urology. Curr Urol Rep 15(5):402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-014-0402-9(Review)
Kraft BM, Jäger C, Kraft K, Leibl BJ, Bittner R (2004) The AESOP robot system in laparoscopic surgery: increased risk or advantage for surgeon and patient? Surg Endosc 18(8):1216–1223 (Epub 2004 Jun 23)
Allaf ME, Jackman SV, Schulam PG, Cadeddu JA, Lee BR, Moore RG, Kavoussi LR (1998) Laparoscopic visual field. Voice vs foot pedal interfaces for control of the AESOP robot. Surg Endosc 12(12):1415–1418
Passerotti C, Peters CA (2006) Robotic-assisted laparoscopy applied to reconstructive surgeries in children. World J Urol 24(2):193–197
Muneer A, Arya M, Shergill IS, Sharma D, Hammadeh MY, Mushtaq I (2008) Current status of robotic surgery in pediatric urology. Pediatr Surg Int 24(9):973–977. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-008-2208-7(Epub 2008 Jul 31. Review)
Peters CA, Schlussel RN, Retik AB (1995) Pediatric laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol 153(6):1962–1965
Peters CA (2009) Pediatric robotic-assisted surgery: too early an assessment? Pediatrics 124(6):1680–1681. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-2562
Casale P, Kojima Y (2009) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery in pediatric urology: an update. Scand J Surg 98(2):110–119 (Review)
Murthy PB, Schadler ED, Orvieto M, Zagaja G, Shalhav AL, Gundeti MS (2018) Setting up a pediatric robotic urology program: a USA institution experience. Int J Urol 25(2):86–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.13415(Epub 2017 Jul 22. Review)
Atala A, Kavoussi LR, Goldstein DS, Retik AB, Peters CA (1993) Laparoscopic correction of vesicoureteral reflux. J Urol 150(2 Pt 2):748–751
Ehrlich RM, Gershman A, Fuchs G (1993) Laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation for vesicoureteral reflux: initial case reports. J Endourol 7:S171
Janetschek G, Radmayr C, Bartsch G (1995) Laparoscopic ureteral anti-reflux plasty reimplantation. First clinical experience. Ann Urol (Paris) 29(2):101–105
Lakshmanan Y, Fung LC (2000) Laparoscopic extravesicular ureteral reimplantation for vesicoureteral reflux: recent technical advances. J Endourol 14(7):589–593 (discussion 593–584)
Peters C (2003) Laparoscopy in paediatric urology: adoption of innovative technology. BJUI 92:52–57
Yeung CK, Sihoe JD, Borzi PA (2005) Endoscopic cross-trigonal ureteral reimplantation under carbon dioxide bladder insufflation: a novel technique. J Endourol 19(3):295–299
Canon SJ, Jayanthi VR, Patel AS (2007) Vesicoscopic cross-trigonal ureteral reimplantation: a minimally invasive option for repair of vesicoureteral reflux. J Urol 178(1):269–273 (discussion 273)
Baek M, Koh CJ (2017) Lessons learned over a decade of pediatric robotic ureteral reimplantation. Investig Clin Urol 58(1):3–11. https://doi.org/10.4111/icu.2017.58.1.3(Epub 2017 Jan 9. Review)
Boysen WR, Ellison JS, Kim C, Koh CJ, Noh P, Whittam B, Palmer B, Shukla A, Kirsch A, Gundeti MS (2017) Multi-institutional review of outcomes and complications of robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation for treatment of primary vesicoureteral reflux in children. J Urol 197(6):1555–1561
Varda BK, Wang Y, Chung BI, Lee RS, Kurtz MP, Nelson CP, Chang SL (2018) Has the robot caught up? National trends in utilization, perioperative outcomes, and cost for open, laparoscopic, and robotic pediatric pyeloplasty in the United States from 2003 to 2015. J Pediatr Urol 14(4):336.e1–336.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.12.010(Epub 2018 Feb 22. PubMed PMID: 29530407; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6105565)
Silay MS, Spinoit AF, Undre S, Fiala V, Tandogdu Z, Garmanova T, Guttilla A, Sancaktutar AA, Haid B, Waldert M, Goyal A, Serefoglu EC, Baldassarre E, Manzoni G, Radford A, Subramaniam R, Cherian A, Hoebeke P, Jacobs M, Rocco B, Yuriy R, Zattoni F, Kocvara R, Koh CJ (2016) Global minimally invasive pyeloplasty study in children: results from the Pediatric Urology Expert Group of the European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists working party. J Pediatr Urol 12(4):229.e1–229.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.04.007(Epub 2016 May 12)
Kassite I, Braik K, Villemagne T, Lardy H, Binet A (2018) The learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: a multi-outcome approach. J Pediatr Urol 14(6):570.e1–570.e10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.07.019(Epub 2018 Aug 2 PubMed PMID: 30177385)
Timberlake MD, Peters CA (2017) Current status of robotic-assisted surgery for the treatment of vesicoureteral reflux in children. Curr Opin Urol 27(1):20–26 (Review)
Grimsby GM, Dwyer ME, Jacobs MA, Ost MC, Schneck FX, Cannon GM, Gargollo PC (2015) Multi-institutional review of outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation. J Urol 193(5 Suppl):1791–1795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.07.128(Epub 2014 Oct 7)
Baek M, Silay MS, Au JK, Huang GO, Elizondo RA, Puttmann KT, Janzen NK, Seth A, Roth DR, Koh CJ (2018) Does the use of 5 mm instruments affect the outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in smaller working spaces? A comparative analysis of infants and older children. J Pediatr Urol 14(6):537.e1–537.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.06.010(Epub 2018 Jul 6 PubMed PMID: 30007500)
Casale P, Lendvay TS (2010) Robotic hypospadias surgery: a new evolution. J Robot Surg 3(4):239–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-009-0165-3(Epub 2009 Nov 26)
Sorensen MD, Delostrinos C, Johnson MH, Grady RW, Lendvay TS (2011) Comparison of the learning curve and outcomes of robotic assisted pediatric pyeloplasty. J Urol 185(6 Suppl):2517–2522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.01.021(Epub 2011 Apr 28)
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Satyanarayan, A., Peters, C.A. Advances in robotic surgery for pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction and vesicoureteral reflux: history, present, and future. World J Urol 38, 1821–1826 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02753-3
- Robotic surgery
- Ureteral reimplantation