Skip to main content

Mortality from kidney stone disease (KSD) as reported in the literature over the last two decades: a systematic review

Abstract

Introduction

Current trends show a rising incidence of kidney stone disease (KSD) globally, with a lifetime risk of 10% and increasing hospital admissions. However, it is not perceived as a life-threatening condition and there are no publications examining its mortality rate. The aim of this review was to report on the number of KSD mortalities in the literature from the past two decades, identify risk factors, and to summarize their key learning points.

Methods

A search was conducted for full-text English language articles that reported on KSD associated mortality, following intervention or conservative treatment, published between 1999 and 2017, using PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL, Clinicaltrials.gov, Google Scholar and The Cochrane Library. Study quality and risk of bias assessment was undertaken using a validated critical appraisal tool from the Joanna Briggs Institute.

Results

Of the 2786 articles identified, 34 were included. Of the total number of reported mortalities (2550), 21% were related to intervention. Sepsis was the leading cause of mortality. Risk factors identified were patients with multiple co-morbidities, spinal cord injury or neurogenic bladder and high stone burden. The main recommendations suggested were to treat pre-operative UTI or use prophylactic antibiotics and to reduce operative duration. The included studies were of moderate to good quality.

Conclusion

Pre-procedural optimization of the patients is the key to avoiding KSD mortality, and care should be taken in patients with multiple co-morbidities. Surgeons should meticulously plan for patients with high stone burden to reduce their operative time, as mortality can be procedural related.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Hyams ES, Matlaga BR (2014) Economic impact of urinary stones. Transl Androl Urol 3(3):278–283

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Sorokin I, Mamoulakis C, Miyazawa K, Rodgers A, Talati J, Lotan Y (2017) Epidemiology of stone disease across the world. World J Urol 35(9):1301–1320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rukin N, Siddiqui Z, Chedgy E, Somani BK (2017) Trends in upper tract stone disease in England: evidence from the hospital episodes statistics database. Urol Int 98(4):391–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sammon JD, Ghani KR, Karakiewicz PI, Bhojani N, Ravi P, Sun M, Sukumar S, Trinh VQ, Kowalczyk KJ, Kim SP, Peabody JO, Menon M, Trinh QD (2013) Temporal trends, practice patterns, and treatment outcomes for infected upper urinary tract stones in the United States. Eur Urol 64:85–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Geraghty RM, Jones P, Somani BK (2017) Worldwide trends of urinary stone disease treatment over the last two decades: a systematic review. J Endourol 31(6):547–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Turney BW, Reynard JM, Noble JG, Keoghane SR (2012) Trends in urological stone disease. BJU Int 109:1082–1087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Joanna Brigg’s Institute Critical Appraisal tool. http://joannabriggs.org/research/critical-appraisal-tools.html. Accessed 21 Oct 2017

  8. Hussain M, Khalique M, Khan M, Hashmi A, Hussain Z (2012) Experience with managing neglected renal calculi in a developing country. J Endourol 26:102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kum F, Mahmalji W, Hale J, Thomas K, Bultitude M, Glass J (2016) Do stones still kill? An analysis of death from stone disease 1999–2013 in England and Wales. BJU Int 118:140–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pattaras JG, Ogan K, Martinez E, Nieh P (2008) Endourological management of urolithiasis in hepatically compromised patients. J Urol 179:976–980

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Welk B, Shariff S, Ordon M, Catharine Craven B, Herschorn S, Garg AX (2013) The surgical management of upper tract stone disease among spinal cord-injured patients. Spinal Cord 51:457–460

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ghani KR, Sammon JD, Bhojani N, Karakiewicz PI, Sun M, Sukumar S, Littleton R, Peabody JO, Menon M, Trinh QD (2013) Trends in percutaneous nephrolithotomy use and outcomes in the United States. J Urol 190:558–564

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Baldea KG, Blackwell RH, Vedachalam S, Kothari AN, Kuo PC, Gupta GN, Turk TMT (2017) Outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in spinal cord injury patients as compared to a matched cohort. Urolithiasis 45:501–506

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sugihara T, Yasunaga H, Horiguchi H, Nishimatsu H, Kume H, Ohe K, Matsuda S, Fushimi K, Homma Y (2013) A nomogram predicting severe adverse events after ureteroscopic lithotripsy: 12,372 patients in a Japanese national series. BJU International. 111:459–466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. De La Rosette J, Denstedt J, Geavlete P, Keeley F, Matsuda T, Pearle M, Preminger G, Traxer O (2014) The clinical research office of the endourological society ureteroscopy global study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 11,885 patients. J Endourol 28:131–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kao MH, Wang CC (2016) Risk factors for developing a perirenal hematoma after flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Urol Sci 27:166–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cindolo L, Castellan P, Primiceri G, Hoznek A, Cracco CM, Scoffone CM, Galfa No A, Petralia G, De Angelis M, Annino F, Malacasa E, Cormio L, Acquati P, Delorenzis E, Maugeri O, Arena G, Celia A, Giusti G, Schips L (2017) Life-threatening complications after ureteroscopy for urinary stones: survey and systematic literature review. Minerva Urol Nefrol 69:421–431

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cindolo L, Castellan P, Scoffone CM, Cracco CM, Celia A, Paccaduscio A, Schips L, Proietti S, Breda A, Giusti G (2016) Mortality and flexible ureteroscopy: analysis of six cases. World J Urol 34:305–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Margel D, Lifshitz DA, Kugel V, Dorfmann D, Lask D, Livne PM (2005) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients who previously underwent open nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 19:1161–1164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hosseini MM, Yousefi A, Hassanpour A, Jahanbini S, Zaki-Abbasi M (2015) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in solitary kidneys: experience with 412 cases from Southern Iran. Urolithiasis 43:233–236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mousavi-Bahar SH, Mehrabi S, Moslemi MK (2011) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy complications in 671 consecutive patients: a single-center experience. Urol J 8:271–276

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Knox ML, Cantor AM, Bryant JE, Burns JR (2012) Predictive factors for percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes in neurogenic bladder population. J Endourol 26:823–827

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yuruk E, Tefekli A, Sari E, Karadag MA, Tepeler A, Binbay M, Muslumanoglu AY (2009) Does previous extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy affect the performance and outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy? J Urol 181:663–667

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Egilmez T, Goren MR (2015) Fever and systemic inflammatory response syndrome seen after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: review of 1290 adult patients. J Clin Anal Med 6:196–201

    Google Scholar 

  25. Oner S, Okumus MM, Demirbas M, Onen E, Aydos MM, Ustun MH, Kilic M, Avci S (2015) Factors influencing complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a single-center study. Urol J 12:2317–2323

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. el-Nahas AR, Eraky I, Shokeir AA, Shoma AM, el-Assmy AM, el-Tabey NA, Soliman S, Elshal AM, el-Kappany HA, el-Kenawy MR (2012) Factors affecting stone-free rate and complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of staghorn stone. Urology 79:1236–1241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tefekli A, Karadag MA, Tepeler K, Sari E, Berberoglu Y, Baykal M, Sarilar O, Muslumanoglu AY (2008) Classification of percutaneous nephrolithotomy complications using the modified Clavien grading system: looking for a standard. Eur Urol 53:184–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Unsal A, Resorlu B, Atmaca AF, Diri A, Goktug HN, Can CE, Gok B, Tuygun C, Germiyonoglu C (2012) Prediction of morbidity and mortality after percutaneous nephrolithotomy by using the Charlson Comorbidity Index. Urology. 79:55–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Choi SW, Bae WJ, Ha US, Hong SH, Lee JY, Kim SW, Cho HJ (2016) Prognostic impact of stone-scoring systems after percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn calculi: a single center’s experience over 10 years. J Endourol 30:975–981

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Tugcu V, Su FE, Kalfazade N, Sahin S, Ozbay B, Tasci AI (2008) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in patients with previous open stone surgery. Int Urol Nephrol 40:881–884

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Resorlu B, Diri A, Atmaca AF, Tuygun C, Oztuna D, Bozkurt OF, Unsal A (2012) Can we avoid percutaneous nephrolithotomy in high-risk elderly patients using the Charlson comorbidity index? Urology 79:1042–1047

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Liu C, Zhang X, Liu Y, Wang P (2013) Prevention and treatment of septic shock following mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a single-center retrospective study of 834 cases. World J Urol 31:1593–1597

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Moreno-Palacios J, Maldonado-Alcaraz E, Montoya-Martinez G, Rivas-Ruiz R, Cedillo-Lopez U, Okhunov Z, Serrano-Brambila EA (2014) Prognostic factors of morbidity in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 28:1078–1084

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Armitage JN, Withington J, van der Meulen J, Cromwell DA, Glass J, Finch WG, Irving SO, Burgess NA (2014) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in England: practice and outcomes described in the Hospital Episode Statistics database. BJU Int 113:777–782

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Falahatkar S, Khosropanah I, Roshan ZA, Golshahi M, Emadi SA (2009) Decreasing the complications of PCNL with alternative techniques including complete supine PCNL and subcostal approach. Pak J Med Sci 25:353–358

    Google Scholar 

  36. Reddy SV, Shaik AB (2016) Outcome and complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy as primary versus secondary procedure for renal calculi. Int Braz J Urol 42:262–269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ibrahim A, Elsotohi I, Mahjoub S, Elatreisy A, Soliman K, Mabrouk M, Khalaf I (2017) Factors determining perioperative complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a single center perspective. Afr J Urol 23:208–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Palnizky G, Halachmi S, Barak M (2014) Pulmonary complications following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective study. Curr Urol 7:113–116

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Khalaf I, Salih E, El-Mallah E, Farghal S, Abdel-Raouf A (2013) The outcome of open renal stone surgery calls for limitation of its use: a single institution experience. Afr J Urol 19:58–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Blackwell RH, Barton GJ, Kothari AN, Zapf MAC, Flanigan RC, Kuo PC, Gupta GN (2016) Early intervention during acute stone admissions: revealing “the weekend effect” in urological practice. J Urol 196:124–130

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Deutsch PG, Subramonian K (2016) Conservative management of staghorn calculi: a single-centre experience. BJU Int 118:444–450

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Straub M, Knoll T (2016) EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur Urol 69:475–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Breda A, Angerri O (2014) Retrograde intrarenal surgery for kidney stones larger than 2.5 cm. Curr Opin Urol 24:179–183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Osther PJS (2018) Risks of flexible ureterorenoscopy: pathophysiology and prevention. Urolithiasis 46(1):59–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Loftus CJ, Hinck B, Makivey I et al (2018) Mini versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: the impact of sheath size on intra-renal pelvic pressure and infectious complications in a porcine model. J Endourol. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2017.0602 (epub ahead of print)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LA Whitehurst: Project development, data collection, data analysis and manuscript writing; P Jones: Data collection and data analysis; BK Somani: Project development, manuscript editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lily Whitehurst.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 247 kb)

Appendix 1: Search matrix used for study

Appendix 1: Search matrix used for study

((((((((((((((((urolithiasis) OR renal stone*) OR kidney stone*) OR urinary calculi)) OR urinary stone*)) OR renal calculi)) AND life-threatening)) OR ((((((((((urolithiasis) OR renal stone*) OR kidney stone*) OR urinary calculi)) OR urinary stone*)) OR renal calculi)) AND mortality)) OR ((((((((((urolithiasis) OR renal stone*) OR kidney stone*) OR urinary calculi)) OR urinary stone*)) OR renal calculi)) AND death))) OR ((((((((ureteroscopy) AND mortality)) OR ((ureteroscopy) AND death)) OR ((ureteroscopy) AND life-threatening)) OR ((URS) AND mortality)) OR ((URS) AND life-threatening)) OR ((URS) AND death))) OR ((((((((percutaneous nephrolithotomy) AND mortality)) OR ((percutaneous nephrolithotomy) AND death)) OR ((percutaneous nephrolithotomy) AND life-threatening)) OR ((PCNL) AND mortality)) OR ((PCNL) AND death)) OR ((PCNL) AND life-threatening))) OR ((((((((shockwave lithotripsy) AND mortality)) OR ((shockwave lithotripsy) AND death)) OR ((shockwave lithotripsy) AND life-threatening)) OR ((SWL) AND mortality)) OR ((SWL) AND death)) OR ((SWL) AND life-threatening)).

(((((((((kidney stone) AND “active surveillance”)) OR ((renal stone) AND “active surveillance”)) OR ((renal calculi) AND “active surveillance”)) OR ((urinary stone) AND “active surveillance”)) OR ((urinary calculi) AND “active surveillance”)) OR ((urolithiasis) AND “active surveillance”))) OR ((((((((urolithiasis) AND “no treatment”)) OR ((urinary calculi) AND “no treatment”)) OR ((urinary stones) AND “no treatment”)) OR ((renal calculi) AND “no treatment”)) OR ((renal stones) AND “no treatment”)) OR ((kidney stones) AND “no treatment”)).

(((((((kidney stone) AND conservative)) OR ((renal stone) AND conservative)) OR ((renal calculi) AND conservative)) OR ((urinary stone) AND conservative)) OR ((urinary calculi) AND conservative)) OR ((urolithiasis) AND conservative).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Whitehurst, L., Jones, P. & Somani, B.K. Mortality from kidney stone disease (KSD) as reported in the literature over the last two decades: a systematic review. World J Urol 37, 759–776 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2424-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2424-2

Keywords

  • Mortality
  • Ureteroscopy
  • Lithotripsy
  • SWL
  • Stone
  • Percutaneous nephrolithotomy
  • PCNL
  • Urolithiasis