Skip to main content

Pressure matters: intrarenal pressures during normal and pathological conditions, and impact of increased values to renal physiology

Abstract

Purpose

To perform a review on the latest evidence related to normal and pathological intrarenal pressures (IRPs), complications of incremented values, and IRP ranges during endourology.

Methods

A literature search was performed using PubMed, restricted to original English-written articles, including animal, artificial model, and human studies. Different keywords were: percutaneous nephrolithotomy, PCNL, ureteroscopy, URS, RIRS, irrigation flow, irrigation pressure, intrarenal pressure, intrapelvic pressure and renal pelvic pressure.

Results

Normal IRPs range from zero to a few cm H2O. Pyelovenous backflow may occur at pressure range of 13.6–27.2 cm H2O. During upper tract endourology, complications such as pyelorenal backflow, sepsis, and renal damage are directly related to increased IRPs. Duration of increased IRPs and concomitant obstruction are independent predictors of complication development.

Conclusions

IRP increase remains a neglected predictor of upper tract endourology complications and its intraoperative monitoring should be taken into consideration. Further research is necessary, to quantify pressures generated during upper tract endourology, and introduce means of controlling them.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. 1.

    Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G (2008) Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J 22(2):338–342. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Struthers NW (1969) The role of manometry in the investigation of pelvi-ureteral function. Br J Urol 41(2):129–162

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Rattner WH, Fink S, Murphy JJ (1957) Pressure studies in the human ureter and renal pelvis. J Urol 78(4):359–362

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Weaver RG, Yelderman JJ (1967) The positive pressure catheter for measurement of intracavital pressures and pressure patterns. J Urol 98(6):718–720

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Whitaker RH (1973) Methods of assessing obstruction in dilated ureters. Br J Urol 45(1):15–22

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Whitaker RH (1979) An evaluation of 170 diagnostic pressure flow studies of the upper urinary tract. J Urol 121(5):602–604

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Veenboer PW, de Jong TP (2011) Antegrade pressure measurement as a diagnostic tool in modern pediatric urology. World J Urol 29(6):737–741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-011-0717-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Pfitzner J (1976) Poiseuille and his law. Anaesthesia 31(2):273–275

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Bullock KN (1983) The biomechanical principles of upper urinary tract pressure-flow studies. Br J Urol 55(2):136–139

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Kiil F (1953) Pressure recordings in the upper urinary tract. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 5(4):383–384. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365515309094217

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Hinman F, Redewill FH (1926) Pyelovenous back flow. J Am Med Assoc 87(16):1287–1293. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1926.02680160035011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Walzak MP Jr, Paquin AJ Jr (1961) Renal pelvic pressure levels in management of nephrostomy. J Urol 85:697–702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Kinn AC (1981) Pressure flow studies in hydronephrosis. Scand J Urol Nephrol 15(3):249–255

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Lupton EW, Holden D, George NJ, Barnard RJ, Rickards D (1985) Pressure changes in the dilated upper urinary tract on perfusion at varying flow rates. Br J Urol 57(6):622–624

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Pfister RC, Newhouse JH, Hendren WH (1982) Percutaneous pyeloureteral urodynamics. Urol Clin North Am 9(1):41–49

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Fichtner J, Boineau FG, Lewy JE, Sibley RK, Vari RC, Shortliffe LM (1994) Congenital unilateral hydronephrosis in a rat model: continuous renal pelvic and bladder pressures. J Urol 152(2 Pt 2):652–657

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Kukreja RA, Desai MR, Sabnis RB, Patel SH (2002) Fluid absorption during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: does it matter? J Endourol 16(4):221–224. https://doi.org/10.1089/089277902753752160

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Stenberg A, Bohman SO, Morsing P, Muller-Suur C, Olsen L, Persson AE (1988) Back-leak of pelvic urine to the bloodstream. Acta Physiol Scand 134(2):223–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-1716.1988.tb08483.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Boccafoschi C, Lugnani F (1985) Intra-renal reflux. Urol Res 13(5):253–258

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Jung HU, Frimodt-Moller PC, Osther PJ, Mortensen J (2006) Pharmacological effect on pyeloureteric dynamics with a clinical perspective: a review of the literature. Urol Res 34(6):341–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-006-0069-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Thomsen HS, Dorph S, Olsen S (1982) Pyelorenal backflow in rabbits following clamping of the renal vein and artery: radiologic and microscopic investigation. Acta Radiol Diagn 23(2):143–148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Thomsen HS, Dorph S, Olsen S (1981) Pyelorenal backflow in normal and ischemic rabbit kidneys. Invest Radiol 16(3):206–214

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Thomsen HS, Larsen S, Talner LB (1982) Pyelorenal backflow during retrograde pyelography in normal and ischemic porcine kidneys. A radiologic and pathoanatomic study. Eur Urol 8(5):291–297

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Hodson CJ (1969) The effects of disturbance of flow on the kidney. J Infect Dis 120(1):54–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Hahn RG (1991) Monitoring of TURP with ethanol. Lancet (London, England) 338(8782–8783):1602

  26. 26.

    Schultz RE, Hanno PM, Wein AJ, Levin RM, Pollack HM, Van Arsdalen KN (1983) Percutaneous ultrasonic lithotripsy: choice of irrigant. The Journal of urology 130(5):858–860

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Malhotra SK, Khaitan A, Goswami AK, Gill KD, Dutta A (2001) Monitoring of irrigation fluid absorption during percutaneous nephrolithotripsy: the use of 1% ethanol as a marker. Anaesthesia 56(11):1103–1106

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Xu S, Shi H, Zhu J, Wang Y, Cao Y, Li K, Wang Y, Sun Z, Xia S (2014) A prospective comparative study of hemodynamic, electrolyte, and metabolic changes during percutaneous nephrolithotomy and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol 32(5):1275–1280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-013-1204-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Carson CC, Nesbitt JA (1985) Peritoneal extravasation during percutaneous lithotripsy. J Urol 134(4):725–727

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Sinclair JF, Hutchison A, Baraza R, Telfer AB (1985) Absorption of 1.5% glycine after percutaneous ultrasonic lithotripsy for renal stone disease. Br Med J (Clinical research ed) 291(6497):691–692

  31. 31.

    Dimberg M, Norlen H, Hoglund N, Allgen LG (1993) Absorption of irrigating fluid during percutaneous transrenal lithotripsy. Scand J Urol Nephrol 27(4):463–467

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Rao PN (1987) Fluid absorption during urological endoscopy. Br J Urol 60(2):93–99

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Cybulski P, Honey RJ, Pace K (2004) Fluid absorption during ureterorenoscopy. J Endourol 18(8):739–742. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2004.18.739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Zhong W, Leto G, Wang L, Zeng G (2015) Systemic inflammatory response syndrome after flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a study of risk factors. J Endourol 29(1):25–28. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2014.0409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Seitz C, Desai M, Hacker A, Hakenberg OW, Liatsikos E, Nagele U, Tolley D (2012) Incidence, prevention, and management of complications following percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy. Eur Urol 61(1):146–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.09.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Michel MS, Trojan L, Rassweiler JJ (2007) Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 51(4):899–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2006.10.020 (discussion 906)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Kreydin EI, Eisner BH (2013) Risk factors for sepsis after percutaneous renal stone surgery. Nat Rev Urol 10(10):598–605. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2013.183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Omar M, Noble M, Sivalingam S, El Mahdy A, Gamal A, Farag M, Monga M (2016) Systemic inflammatory response syndrome after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a randomized single-blind clinical trial evaluating the impact of irrigation pressure. J Urol 196(1):109–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.01.104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Schwalb DM, Eshghi M, Davidian M, Franco I (1993) Morphological and physiological changes in the urinary tract associated with ureteral dilation and ureteropyeloscopy: an experimental study. J Urol 149(6):1576–1585

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Thomsen HS, Dorph S, Larsen S, Talner LB (1983) Intrarenal backflow and renal perfusion during increased intrapelvic pressure in excised porcine kidneys. Acta Radiol Diagn 24(4):327–336

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Fung LC, Atala A (1998) Constant elevation in renal pelvic pressure induces an increase in urinary N-acetyl-beta-d-glucosaminidase in a nonobstructive porcine model. J Urol 159(1):212–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Li X, Liu M, Bedja D, Thoburn C, Gabrielson K, Racusen L, Rabb H (2012) Acute renal venous obstruction is more detrimental to the kidney than arterial occlusion: implication for murine models of acute kidney injury. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 302(5):F519–F525. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajprenal.00011.2011

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Park Y, Hirose R, Dang K, Xu F, Behrends M, Tan V, Roberts JP, Niemann CU (2008) Increased severity of renal ischemia-reperfusion injury with venous clamping compared to arterial clamping in a rat model. Surgery 143(2):243–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2007.07.041

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Cao Z, Yu W, Li W, Cheng F, Rao T, Yao X, Zhang X, Larre S (2015) Oxidative damage and mitochondrial injuries are induced by various irrigation pressures in rabbit models of mild and severe hydronephrosis. PLoS One 10(6):e0127143. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127143

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Boddy SA, Nimmon CC, Jones S, Ramsay JW, Britton KE, Levison DA, Whitfield HN (1989) Irrigation and acute ureteric dilatation—as for ureteroscopy. Br J Urol 63(1):11–13

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Shafik A (1998) Response of the renal pelvis and ureter to distension of the contralateral renal pelvis and ureter: identification of the reno-renal pelvic reflex. World J Urol 16(5):359–364

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Atici S, Zeren S, Aribogan A (2001) Hormonal and hemodynamic changes during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Int Urol Nephrol 32(3):311–314

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Mohta M, Bhagchandani T, Tyagi A, Pendse M, Sethi AK (2008) Haemodynamic, electrolyte and metabolic changes during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Int Urol Nephrol 40(2):477–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-006-9093-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Hodson CJ (1981) Neuhauser lecture. Reflux nephropathy: a personal historical review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 137(3):451–462. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.137.3.451

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Thomsen HS (1984) Pyelorenal backflow. Clinical and experimental investigations. Radiologic, nuclear, medical and pathoanatomic studies. Dan Med Bull 31(6):438–457

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Meng H, Chen S, Chen G, Tan F, Wang C, Shen B (2013) Renal subcapsular hemorrhage complicating ureterolithotripsy: an unknown complication of a known day-to-day procedure. Urol Int 91(3):335–339. https://doi.org/10.1159/000350891

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Xu L, Li G (2013) Life-threatening subcapsular renal hematoma after flexible ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy: treatment with superselective renal arterial embolization. Urolithiasis 41(5):449–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-013-0585-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Cutress ML, Stewart GD, Wells-Cole S, Phipps S, Thomas BG, Tolley DA (2012) Long-term endoscopic management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: 20-year single-centre experience. BJU Int 110(11):1608–1617. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11169.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Grasso M, Fishman AI, Cohen J, Alexander B (2012) Ureteroscopic and extirpative treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a 15-year comprehensive review of 160 consecutive patients. BJU Int 110(11):1618–1626. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11066.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Zhong W, Zeng G, Wu K, Li X, Chen W, Yang H (2008) Does a smaller tract in percutaneous nephrolithotomy CONTRibute to high renal pelvic pressure and postoperative fever? J Endourol 22(9):2147–2151. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2008.0001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Dogan HS, Sahin A, Cetinkaya Y, Akdogan B, Ozden E, Kendi S (2002) Antibiotic prophylaxis in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: prospective study in 81 patients. J Endourol 16(9):649–653. https://doi.org/10.1089/089277902761402989

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Cao Z, Yu W, Li W, Cheng F, Xia Y, Rao T, Yao X, Zhang X, Larre S (2013) Acute kidney injuries induced by various irrigation pressures in rat models of mild and severe hydronephrosis. Urology 82 (6):1453.e1459–1416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2013.08.024

  58. 58.

    Landman J, Venkatesh R, Ragab M, Rehman J, Lee DI, Morrissey KG, Monga M, Sundaram CP (2002) Comparison of intrarenal pressure and irrigant flow during percutaneous nephroscopy with an indwelling ureteral catheter, ureteral occlusion balloon, and ureteral access sheath. Urology 60(4):584–587

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Shao Y, Shen ZJ, Zhu YY, Sun XW, Lu J, Xia SJ (2012) Fluid-electrolyte and renal pelvic pressure changes during ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Min Invas Ther Allied Technol MITAT 21(4):302–306. https://doi.org/10.3109/13645706.2011.595419

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

TT: Data management, data analysis, manuscript writing. TRW Herrmann: Interpreting data. AS: Interpreting data. UN: Protocol/project development and interpreting data.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Theodoros Tokas.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights

This review does not involve human participants and/or animals.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tokas, T., Herrmann, T.R.W., Skolarikos, A. et al. Pressure matters: intrarenal pressures during normal and pathological conditions, and impact of increased values to renal physiology. World J Urol 37, 125–131 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2378-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Percutaneous nephrolithotomy
  • PCNL
  • Ureteroscopy
  • URS
  • RIRS
  • Irrigation flow
  • Irrigation pressure
  • Intrarenal pressure
  • Intrapelvic pressure
  • Renal pelvic pressure