Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Oncologic outcomes of patients with positive surgical margin after partial nephrectomy: a 25-year single institution experience

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate oncologic outcomes and management of patients with microscopic positive surgical margin (PSM) after partial nephrectomy (PN) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

Methods

We reviewed our database to identify patients who underwent PN between 1990 and 2015 for RCC and had PSM on final pathology. A 1:3 matching was performed to a negative surgical margin (NSM) cohort. Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test were used to estimate survival and differences in outcomes, respectively. Cox proportional hazards models were conducted to estimate the Hazards ratio.

Results

A total of 2297 patients underwent PN at our institution, of which 1863 (81%) had RCC. Microscopic PSM was found in 34 (1.8%) RCC patients who were matched to 100 patients with NSM. Of these 34 patients, local recurrence (n = 4), distant kidney recurrences (n = 4), and metastases (n = 5) developed during a median follow-up of 62 months. Bilateral tumors/tumors in a solitary kidney (n = 12/13, 92%), and multifocal tumors (n = 7/13, 54%) were found in patients who developed recurrence/metastasis. PSM patients were at a higher risk of shorter overall survival (p = 0.001), local recurrence-free survival (p = 0.003), distant recurrence-free survival (p = 0.032) and metastasis-free survival (p = 0.018). There was statistically significant association between PSM and bilateral tumors, prior treated RCC at presentation and higher nephrometry score in multivariable model.

Conclusions

There was a low rate of microscopic PSM in our large cohort of patients undergoing PN despite tumor complexity. Higher nephrometry score, bilateral tumors, and prior treated RCC independently predicted PSM which showed worse survival, recurrence and metastasis compared to patients with NSM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fergany AF, Hafez KS, Novick AC (2000) Long-term results of nephron sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma: 10-year followup. J Urol 163(2):442–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67896-2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Huang WC, Levey AS, Serio AM, Snyder M, Vickers AJ, Raj GV, Scardino PT, Russo P (2006) Chronic kidney disease after nephrectomy in patients with renal cortical tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 7(9):735–740. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(06)70803-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Ljungberg B, Bensalah K, Canfield S, Dabestani S, Hofmann F, Hora M, Kuczyk MA, Lam T, Marconi L, Merseburger AS, Mulders P, Powles T, Staehler M, Volpe A, Bex A (2015) EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: 2014 update. Eur Urol 67(5):913–924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.01.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yossepowitch O, Thompson RH, Leibovich BC, Eggener SE, Pettus JA, Kwon ED, Herr HW, Blute ML, Russo P (2008) Positive surgical margins at partial nephrectomy: predictors and oncological outcomes. J Urol 179(6):2158–2163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.100

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Khalifeh A, Kaouk JH, Bhayani S, Rogers C, Stifelman M, Tanagho YS, Kumar R, Gorin MA, Sivarajan G, Samarasekera D, Allaf ME (2013) Positive surgical margins in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a multi-institutional analysis of oncologic outcomes (leave no tumor behind). J Urol 190(5):1674–1679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.05.110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shah PH, Moreira DM, Okhunov Z, Patel VR, Chopra S, Razmaria AA, Alom M, George AK, Yaskiv O, Schwartz MJ, Desai M, Vira MA, Richstone L, Landman J, Shalhav AL, Gill I, Kavoussi LR (2016) Positive surgical margins increase risk of recurrence after partial nephrectomy for high risk renal tumors. J Urol 196(2):327–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.075

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bensalah K, Pantuck AJ, Rioux-Leclercq N, Thuret R, Montorsi F, Karakiewicz PI, Mottet N, Zini L, Bertini R, Salomon L, Villers A, Soulie M, Bellec L, Rischmann P, De la Taille A, Avakian R, Crepel M, Ferriere JM, Bernhard JC, Dujardin T, Pouliot F, Rigaud J, Pfister C, Albouy B, Guy L, Joniau S, van Poppel H, Lebret T, Culty T, Saint F, Zisman A, Raz O, Lang H, Spie R, Wille A, Roigas J, Aguilera A, Rambeaud B, Martinez Pineiro L, Nativ O, Farfara R, Richard F, Roupret M, Doehn C, Bastian PJ, Muller SC, Tostain J, Belldegrun AS, Patard JJ (2010) Positive surgical margin appears to have negligible impact on survival of renal cell carcinomas treated by nephron-sparing surgery. Eur Urol 57(3):466–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2009.03.048

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kwon EO, Carver BS, Snyder ME, Russo P (2007) Impact of positive surgical margins in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy for renal cortical tumours. BJU Int 99(2):286–289. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.2006.06623.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Marszalek M, Carini M, Chlosta P, Jeschke K, Kirkali Z, Knuchel R, Madersbacher S, Patard JJ, Van Poppel H (2012) Positive surgical margins after nephron-sparing surgery. Eur Urol 61(4):757–763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.11.028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kutikov A, Uzzo RG (2009) The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol 182(3):844–853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Uzzo RG, Novick AC (2001) Nephron sparing surgery for renal tumors: indications, techniques and outcomes. J Urol 166(1):6–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gill IS, Desai MM, Kaouk JH, Meraney AM, Murphy DP, Sung GT, Novick AC (2002) Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumor: duplicating open surgical techniques. J Urol 167(2 Pt 1):467–469 (discussion 475–466)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Petros FG, Rogers CG (2010) Computer-assisted robotic renal surgery. Ther Adv Urol 2(3):127–132

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Petros F, Sukumar S, Haber GP, Dulabon L, Bhayani S, Stifelman M, Kaouk J, Rogers C (2012) Multi-institutional analysis of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for renal tumors > 4 cm versus </= 4 cm in 445 consecutive patients. J Endourol Endourol Soc 26(6):642–646. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2011.0340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Song J, Kim E, Mobley J, Vemana G, Tanagho Y, Vetter J, Bhayani S, Russo P, Fugita O, Yang SS, Iwamura M, Figenshau RS (2014) Port site metastasis after surgery for renal cell carcinoma: harbinger of future metastasis. J Urol 192(2):364–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.02.089

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Russo P (2000) Renal cell carcinoma: presentation, staging, and surgical treatment. Semin oncol 27(2):160–176

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sutherland SE, Resnick MI, Maclennan GT, Goldman HB (2002) Does the size of the surgical margin in partial nephrectomy for renal cell cancer really matter? J Urol 167(1):61–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lane BR, Russo P, Uzzo RG, Hernandez AV, Boorjian SA, Thompson RH, Fergany AF, Love TE, Campbell SC (2011) Comparison of cold and warm ischemia during partial nephrectomy in 660 solitary kidneys reveals predominant role of nonmodifiable factors in determining ultimate renal function. J Urol 185(2):421–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.09.131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Khemees TA, Lam ET, Joehlin-Price AS, Mortazavi A, Phillips GS, Shabsigh A, Sharp DS, Zynger DL (2016) Does the renal parenchyma adjacent to the tumor contribute to kidney function? A critical analysis of glomerular viability in partial nephrectomy specimens. Urology 87:114–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2015.10.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Minervini A, Ficarra V, Rocco F, Antonelli A, Bertini R, Carmignani G, Cosciani Cunico S, Fontana D, Longo N, Martorana G, Mirone V, Morgia G, Novara G, Roscigno M, Schiavina R, Serni S, Simeone C, Simonato A, Siracusano S, Volpe A, Zattoni F, Zucchi A, Carini M (2011) Simple enucleation is equivalent to traditional partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: results of a nonrandomized, retrospective, comparative study. J Urol 185(5):1604–1610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.12.048

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schiavina R, Serni S, Mari A, Antonelli A, Bertolo R, Bianchi G, Brunocilla E, Borghesi M, Carini M, Longo N, Martorana G, Mirone V, Morgia G, Porpiglia F, Rocco B, Rovereto B, Simeone C, Sodano M, Terrone C, Ficarra V, Minervini A (2015) A prospective, multicenter evaluation of predictive factors for positive surgical margins after nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma: the RECORd1 Italian Project. Clin Genitourin Cancer 13(2):165–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2014.08.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Puppo P, Introini C, Calvi P, Naselli A (2004) Long term results of excision of small renal cancer surrounded by a minimal layer of grossly normal parenchyma: review of 94 cases. Eur Urol 46(4):477–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2004.07.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Borghesi M, Brunocilla E, Schiavina R, Martorana G (2013) Positive surgical margins after nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma: incidence, clinical impact, and management. Clin Genitourin Cancer 11(1):5–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2012.09.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Duvdevani M, Laufer M, Kastin A, Mor Y, Nadu A, Hanani J, Nativ O, Ramon J (2005) Is frozen section analysis in nephron sparing surgery necessary? A clinicopathological study of 301 cases. J Urol 173(2):385–387. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000149111.48445.73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Terai A, Ito N, Yoshimura K, Ichioka K, Kamoto T, Arai Y, Ogawa O (2004) Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy using microwave tissue coagulator for small renal tumors: usefulness and complications. Eur Urol 45(6):744–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2004.02.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang C, Xu Y, Zhang Z, Qiao B, Yang K, Liu R, Ma B (2012) Laparoscopic simple enucleation and coagulation on tumor bed using argon beam coagulator for treating small renal cell carcinomas: an animal study followed by clinical application. Med Sci Monit 18(5):193–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sundaram V, Figenshau RS, Roytman TM, Kibel AS, Grubb RL 3rd, Bullock A, Benway BM, Bhayani SB (2011) Positive margin during partial nephrectomy: does cancer remain in the renal remnant? Urology 77(6):1400–1403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2010.12.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Firas G. Petros, Michael J. Metcalfe, Kai-Jie Yu, Sarp K. Keskin, Bryan M. Fellman, Courtney M. Chang, Cindy Gu: Data analysis. Firas G. Petros, Michael J. Metcalfe: Project development, manuscript writing/editing. Pheroze Tamboli, Surena F. Matin, Jose A. Karam, Christopher G. Wood: Project development, manuscript editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher G. Wood.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors have nothing to declare and no competing financial interests in relation to the work described.

Ethical approval

The institutional review board approved this study. For this type of retrospective study formal consent is not required.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Petros, F.G., Metcalfe, M.J., Yu, KJ. et al. Oncologic outcomes of patients with positive surgical margin after partial nephrectomy: a 25-year single institution experience. World J Urol 36, 1093–1101 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2241-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2241-7

Keywords

Navigation