Quantitation of hypoechoic lesions for the prediction and Gleason grading of prostate cancer: a prospective study
Hypoechoic lesions are not included as indicators for prostate biopsy. To discriminate the features of hypoechoic lesions, we investigated the ultrasonographic characteristics of hypoechoic lesions using numerical analysis in image. In addition, we evaluated previously suggested subjective parameters on hypoechoic lesion.
We performed one-core targeted biopsy (TBx) for each hypoechoic lesion in up to two lesions in each patient before the 12-core systemic biopsy was obtained between July 2015 and May 2016. Image analysis data were analyzed using grayscale values and Hounsfield units (HU) to measure heterogeneity. Subjective evaluation of hypoechoic lesions including hypoechoicity, irregularity, vascularity, and microcalcification was also validated.
Of 157 patients (median age = 67.1 years, median prostate-specific antigen = 6.21 ng/mL) included in the study, 77 (49.0%) were diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa), and 39 (17.0%) diagnoses were confirmed by the results of targeted cores. The existence of hypoechoic lesions was not a final predictor for PCa detection. In multivariate analysis using a combination of clinical and quantitative image analyses, the grayscale value was identified as a significant predictive factor for the presence of PCa and high-grade disease (Gleason score ≥ 7) on target lesions. The combination of clinical and image variables had the highest area under the curve (0.890) for detecting PCa in TBx.
The proposed method for the quantitation of hypoechoic lesions using grayscale images and HU is simple. Combined with the current clinical approaches, quantitative scoring of lesions can be useful for detecting PCa and making more precise diagnoses.
KeywordsBiopsy Prostate-specific antigen Prostate cancer Ultrasound
This research was supported in the collection and analysis phases by the Korean Society for Urologic Ultrasonography Grant (Grant Number 2016-00).
KS Lee: project development and manuscript writing; KC Koo: manuscript writing/editing; and BH Chung: project development and manuscript writing
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
The study was approved by our institutional review board. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study, formal consent is not required. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
- 1.Birs A, Joyce PH, Pavlovic ZJ, Lim A (2016) Diagnosis and monitoring of prostatic lesions: a comparison of three modalities: multiparametric MRI, fusion MRI/transrectal ultrasound(TRUS), and traditional TRUS. Cureus 8:e702. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.702 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Stokes M, Anderson M, Chandrasekar S, Motta R (2017) A standard default color space for the Internet – sRGB. https://www.w3.org/Graphics/Color/sRGB.html. Accessed 22 Aug 2017
- 15.Li XG, Zhang DX, Cui XG et al (2012) Evaluating the oncologic outcomes in 152 patients undergoing extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Chin Med J (Engl) 125:1529–1535Google Scholar
- 18.Lee DH, Koo KC, Lee SH et al (2013) Low-risk prostate cancer patients without visible tumor (T1c) on multiparametric MRI could qualify for active surveillance candidate even if they did not meet inclusion criteria of active surveillance protocol. Jpn J Clin Oncol 43:553–558. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyt041 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Nakano Junqueira VC, Zogbi O, Cologna A et al (2012) Is a visible (hypoechoic) lesion at biopsy an independent predictor of prostate cancer outcome? Ultrasound Med Biol 38:1689–1694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.06.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Browne JE, Watson AJ, Hoskins PR, Elliott AT (2004) Validation of a sensitivity performance index test protocol and evaluation of colour Doppler sensitivity for a range of ultrasound scanners. Ultrasound Med Biol 30:1475–1483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2004.09.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar