A prospective study evaluating indirect MRI-signs for the prediction of extraprostatic disease in patients with prostate cancer: tumor volume, tumor contact length and tumor apparent diffusion coefficient
- 147 Downloads
The aim of this study was to evaluate three indirect MRI signs for predicting extraprostatic disease in patients referred to radical prostatectomy: index tumor volume (MTV), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and tumor contact length (TCL).
Materials and methods
This prospective study included 183 patients with biopsy proven prostate cancer. In all patients the MTV (ml), ADC (× 10−5 mm2/s) and TCL (mm) of the index tumor were registered at the preoperative MRI. Whole-mounted microscopical examination classified each patient as having either localized- or extraprostatic disease. The Youden index was used to identify the optimal cut-off values for predicting extraprostatic disease. Univariate regression analyses were conducted to estimate the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results were stratified upon zonal location of the index tumor.
Extraprostatic disease was identified in 103 (56%) patients. The risk of extraprostatic disease was nine times higher in peripheral zone tumors with ADC ≤ 89 (OR 9.1, 95% CI 4.2–19.6), five times higher in MTV ≥ 0.9 ml (OR 5.5, 95% CI 2.6–11.4) and five times higher in case of TCL ≥ 14 mm (OR 4.9, 95% CI 2.3–10.2). None of the indirect MRI signs could predict extraprostatic disease for transition zone tumors.
The MTV, ADC and TCL are all significant predictors of extraprostatic disease for peripheral zone tumors, while none of the indirect signs were useful for transition zone tumors.
KeywordsProstate cancer MRI Staging Extraprostatic disease Indirect signs Tumor capsule length Tumor contact length ADC Tumor volume
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
- 2.Obek C, Louis P, Civantos F, Soloway MS (1999) Comparison of digital rectal examination and biopsy results with the radical prostatectomy specimen. JURO 161:494–498 (discussion 498–9) Google Scholar
- 13.Itou Y, Nakanishi K, Narumi Y et al (2011) Clinical utility of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in patients with prostate cancer: can ADC values contribute to assess the aggressiveness of prostate cancer? J Magn Reson Imaging 33:167–172. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.22317 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Magi-Galluzzi C, Evans AJ, Delahunt B et al (2010) International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on handling and staging of radical prostatectomy specimens. Working group 3: extraprostatic extension, lymphovascular invasion and locally advanced disease. Mod Pathol 24:26–38. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2010.158 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Lawrence EM, Gallagher FA, Barrett T et al (2014) Preoperative 3-T diffusion-weighted MRI for the qualitative and quantitative assessment of extracapsular extension in patients with intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer. Am J Roentgenol 203:W280–W286. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.13.11754 CrossRefGoogle Scholar