Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Minimally invasive cytoreductive nephrectomy: a multi-institutional experience

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To analyze the functional and oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in three high-volume cancer centers.

Patients and methods

Three prospectively maintained, IRB-approved kidney surgery databases were queried from three high-volume cancer centers. All patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery (laparoscopic, hand-assisted laparoscopic, or robotic) partial or radical CN with existing measurable extra-renal metastatic disease between May 2001 and May of 2013 were included in this analysis.

Results

We identified 120 patients who underwent minimally invasive CN for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Most of the surgeries were radical (93.3 %) and performed laparoscopically (96.6 %). Median operative time was 210 min, with a median estimated blood loss of 150 cc, and 11 (9.2 %) patients received blood transfusions. Four (3.3 %) patients were converted to open surgery due to locally advanced disease and/or bleeding. Postoperative complications were seen in 28 (23.3 %) patients, of which 20 (71.4 %) were classified as minor (Clavien–Dindo I–II). The median survival of the entire cohort was 25.7 months, with a 3-year survival rate of 35 %. Multivariate analysis indicated that only hypertension, brain metastasis, and pT stage were independently associated with worse overall survival (HR > 1).

Conclusions

Minimally invasive cytoreductive nephrectomy is feasible and safe in experienced hands with acceptable morbidity and oncological outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2015) Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin 65(1):5–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Flanigan RC, Campbell SC, Clark JI, Picken MM (2003) Metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Curr Treat Options Oncol 4(5):385–390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Flanigan RC, Salmon SE, Blumenstein BA, Bearman SI, Roy V, McGrath PC et al (2001) Nephrectomy followed by interferon alfa-2b compared with interferon alfa-2b alone for metastatic renal-cell cancer. New Engl J Med 345(23):1655–1659

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mickisch GH, Garin A, van Poppel H, de Prijck L, Sylvester R, EuropeanOrganisation et al (2001) Radical nephrectomy plus interferon-alfa-based immunotherapy compared with interferon alfa alone in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma: a randomised trial. Lancet 358(9286):966–970

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Tomczak P, Michaelson MD, Bukowski RM, Rixe O et al (2007) Sunitinib versus interferon alfa in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. New Engl J Med 356(2):115–124

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Escudier B, Eisen T, Stadler WM, Szczylik C, Oudard S, Siebels M et al (2007) Sorafenib in advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma. New Engl J Med 356(2):125–134

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Psutka SP, Kim SP, Gross CP, Van Houten H, Thompson RH, Abouassaly R et al (2015) The impact of targeted therapy on management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: trends in systemic therapy and cytoreductive nephrectomy utilization. Urology 85(2):442–450

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hemal AK, Kumar A, Kumar R, Wadhwa P, Seth A, Gupta NP (2007) Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy for large renal tumors: a long-term prospective comparison. Journal Urol. 177(3):862–866

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bensalah K, Salomon L, Lang H, Zini L, Jacqmin D, Manunta A et al (2009) Survival of patients with nonmetastatic pT3 renal tumours: a matched comparison of laparoscopic vs open radical nephrectomy. BJU Int 104(11):1714–1717

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Matin SF, Madsen LT, Wood CG (2006) Laparoscopic cytoreductive nephrectomy: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. Urology 68(3):528–532

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rabets JC, Kaouk J, Fergany A, Finelli A, Gill IS, Novick AC (2004) Laparoscopic versus open cytoreductive nephrectomy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Urology 64(5):930–934

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stewart GD, Ang WJ, Laird A, Tolley DA, Riddick AC, McNeill SA (2012) The operative safety and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic nephrectomy for T3 renal cell cancer. BJU Int 110(6):884–890

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kassouf W, Sanchez-Ortiz R, Tamboli P, Jonasch E, Merchant MM, Spiess PE et al (2007) Cytoreductive nephrectomy for T4NxM1 renal cell carcinoma: the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. Urology 69(5):835–838

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Blick CBS, Muneer A, Barber NJ, Hindley R, Eden C, Sullivan M (2010) Laparoscopic cytoreductive nephrectomy: a three-center retrospective analysis. J Endourol 24(9):1451–1455

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mathieu R, Pignot G, Ingles A, Crepel M, Bigot P, Bernhard JC et al (2015) Nephrectomy improves overall survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma in cases of favorable MSKCC or ECOG prognostic features. Urol Oncol 33(8):339 e9–339 e15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gershman B, Moreira DM, Boorjian SA, Lohse CM, Cheville JC, Costello BA et al (2015) Comprehensive characterization of the perioperative morbidity of cytoreductive nephrectomy. Eur Urol 69(1):84–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim SB, Williams SB, Cheng SC, Sanda MG, Wagner AA (2012) Evaluation of patient-reported quality-of-life outcomes after renal surgery. Urology 79(6):1268–1273

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author’s contribution

L. A. Nunez Bragayrac was involved in project development and data management, analyzed the data, and wrote and edited the manuscript. J. Hoffmeyer was involved in protocol development and data collection and edited the manuscript. D. Abbotoy was involved in data collection and edited the manuscript. K. Attwood was involved in data management and analyzed the data. E. Kauffman was involved in data management and edited the manuscript. P. Spiess was involved in project development and data collection/management and edited the manuscript. A. Wagner was involved in project development and data collection/management and edited the manuscript. T. Schwaab was involved in protocol development and data collection/management, and wrote and edited the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luciano Nunez Bragayrac.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nunez Bragayrac, L., Hoffmeyer, J., Abbotoy, D. et al. Minimally invasive cytoreductive nephrectomy: a multi-institutional experience. World J Urol 34, 1651–1656 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-016-1827-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-016-1827-1

Keywords

Navigation