Skip to main content
Log in

Utilization of a novel valveless trocar system during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the effect of a novel valveless trocar system (VTS) on perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP).

Methods

A single-institution retrospective review was performed of 792 patients undergoing RALP. Preoperative patient variables, tumor characteristics, and perioperative variables were collected and analyzed. The first 150 patients were excluded from analysis to account for the learning curve of robotic surgery. Univariate and multivariate linear regression models were used to assess factors affecting operative time (ORT).

Results

A total of 257 and 385 patients underwent RALP utilizing the VTS and conventional insufflation, respectively. There were no significant differences in American Society of Anesthesiologist score, body mass index (BMI), prostate volume, final Gleason score, estimated blood loss, and complications between the cohorts. The only difference noted was a significantly shorter mean ORT in the VTS cohort (149.5 vs. 170.1 min, p < 0.0001). In light of this finding, further analysis was performed to identify associations with ORT. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that VTS, BMI, final Gleason score, prostate volume, surgeon, and node dissection were significantly associated with ORT. The use of the VTS decreased mean ORT by 23.2 min when controlling for confounding factors (p < 0.001). The performance of a nerve sparing operation was found to decrease ORT by 15.9 min (p < 0.001), though more often performed for lower-risk disease.

Conclusion

The use of a novel VTS demonstrated decreased ORT in patients undergoing RALP when controlling for confounding factors. Prospective randomized trials are needed to evaluate its ultimate benefit in various surgical cohorts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barczynski M, Herman RM (2002) Influence of different pressures of pneumoperitoneum on the autonomic system function during laparoscopy. Folia Med Cracov 43:51–58

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hazebroek EJ, Haitsma JJ, Lachmann B et al (2002) Impact of carbon dioxide and helium insufflation on cardiorespiratory function during prolonged pneumoperitoneum in an experimental rat model. Surg Endosc 16:1073–1078

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Herati AS, Andonian S, Rais-Bahrami S et al (2011) Use of the valveless trocar system reduces CO2 absorption during laparoscopy with compared with standard trocars. Urology 77:1126–1132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Herati AS, Atalla MA, Rais-Bahrami S, Andonian S, Vira MA, Kavoussi LR (2009) A new valveless trocar for urologic laparoscopy: initial evaluation. J Endourol 23(9):1535–1539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tollefson MK, Frank I, Gettman MT (2011) Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy decreases the incidence and morbidity of surgical site infections. Urology 78(4):827–831

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kordan Y, Barocas DA, Altamar HO et al (2010) Comparison of transfusion requirements between open and robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 106(7):1036–1040

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. George AK, Herati AS, Srinivasan AK et al (2013) Perioperative outcomes of off-clamp vs complete hilar control laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. BJU Int 111(4 Pt B):E235–E241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. George AK, Herati AS, Rais-Bahrami S, Waingankar N, Kavoussi LR (2014) Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for hilar tumors: oncologic and renal functional outcomes. Urology 83(1):111–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hillelsohn JH, Friedlander JI, Bagadiya N et al (2012) Masked Pneumothorax: risk of valveless trocar systems. J Urol 189:955–959

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rais-Bahrami S, George AK, Herati AS, Srinivasan AK, Richstone L, Kavoussi LR (2012) Off-clamp versus complete hilar control laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison by clinical stage. BJU Int 109(9):1376–1381

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Leppert JT, Breda A, Harper JD, Schulam PG (2011) Laparoendoscopic single-site porcine nephrectomy using a novel valveless trocar system. J Endourol 25(1):119–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gurusamy KS, Samraj K, Davidson BR (2009) Low pressure versus standard pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 15(2):CD006930

    Google Scholar 

  13. Samadi D, Levinson A, Hakimi A, Shabsigh R, Benson MC (2007) From proficiency to expert, when does the learning curve for robotic-assisted prostatectomies plateau? The Columbia University experience. World J Urol 25(1):105–110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

Funding support for statistical analysis was provided by Surgiquest Inc.

Ethical standard

This patient study has been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and has therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arvin K. George.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

George, A.K., Wimhofer, R., Viola, K.V. et al. Utilization of a novel valveless trocar system during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. World J Urol 33, 1695–1699 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1521-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1521-8

Keywords

Navigation