Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Predictors of short-term recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate treatment variables for early urinary continence status 6 weeks following radical prostatectomy.

Methods

In this retrospective analysis, 4,028 consecutive patients underwent open radical retropubic (RRP) or robot-assisted transperitoneal prostatectomy (RARP) at a single academic institution (07/2003–07/2013). After discharge, patients were offered 3-week treatment in a rehabilitation facility. Patients who opted for rehabilitation (n = 2,998, 74.4 %) represent our study cohort. Exclusion criteria were acute urinary retention after catheter removal (n = 55, 1.4 %), incomplete datasets (n = 50, 1.2 %) or refusal of rehabilitation (n = 925, 23.0 %). Results of urinary continence were evaluated from final rehabilitation reports. Twenty-two clinical and oncological variables were statistically analysed in uni- and multivariable analyses to determine whether they were associated with early urinary continence status six weeks after radical prostatectomy. Odds ratios and 95 % CI as well as p values were calculated. A p level of 0.05 was considered as significant.

Results

Six weeks after surgery, 1,962 (65.4 %) patients were continent (≤1 pad/day) and 1,036 (34.6 %) patients were considered incontinent. Age, clinical stage, PSA, ASA score, prior TURP, seminal vesicle invasion, Gleason score, nerve-sparing status, intraoperative blood loss, catheterisation time, OR time, surgical caseload >1,000 and the surgeon were associated with continence status on univariable analysis (p < 0.05). On multivariable analysis, nerve-sparing procedure (NS), clinical stage, individual surgeon, patient age, surgical procedure (RARP vs. RRP) and duration of catheterisation were independent predictors (p < 0.05) of incontinence status.

Conclusions

Strategies that can ensure NS procedures and early catheter removal should be applied to enable early recovery of urinary continence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sanda MG, Dunn RL, Michalski J, Sandler HM, Northouse L, Hembroff L, Lin X, Greenfield TK, Litwin MS, Saigal CS, Mahadevan A, Klein E, Kibel A, Pisters LL, Kuban D, Kaplan I, Wood D, Ciezki J, Shah N, Wei JT (2008) Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors. N Engl J Med 358(12):1250–1261. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa074311

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Krupski TL, Saigal CS, Litwin MS (2003) Variation in continence and potency by definition. J Urol 170(4 Pt 1):1291–1294. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000085341.63407.46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Walsh PC, Marschke P, Ricker D, Burnett AL (2000) Patient-reported urinary continence and sexual function after anatomic radical prostatectomy. Urology 55(1):58–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Saranchuk JW, Kattan MW, Elkin E, Touijer AK, Scardino PT, Eastham JA (2005) Achieving optimal outcomes after radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol 23(18):4146–4151. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.12.922

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ficarra V, Novara G, Artibani W, Cestari A, Galfano A, Graefen M, Guazzoni G, Guillonneau B, Menon M, Montorsi F, Patel V, Rassweiler J, Van Poppel H (2009) Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol 55(5):1037–1063. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2009.01.036

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ficarra V, Novara G, Ahlering TE, Costello A, Eastham JA, Graefen M, Guazzoni G, Menon M, Mottrie A, Patel VR, Van der Poel H, Rosen RC, Tewari AK, Wilson TG, Zattoni F, Montorsi F (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62(3):418–430. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Walz J, Burnett AL, Costello AJ, Eastham JA, Graefen M, Guillonneau B, Menon M, Montorsi F, Myers RP, Rocco B, Villers A (2010) A critical analysis of the current knowledge of surgical anatomy related to optimization of cancer control and preservation of continence and erection in candidates for radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 57(2):179–192. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2009.11.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Walsh PC, Marschke PL (2002) Intussusception of the reconstructed bladder neck leads to earlier continence after radical prostatectomy. Urology 59(6):934–938

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rocco F, Carmignani L, Acquati P, Gadda F, Dell’Orto P, Rocco B, Bozzini G, Gazzano G, Morabito A (2006) Restoration of posterior aspect of rhabdosphincter shortens continence time after radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 175(6):2201–2206. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(06)00262-X

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Patel VR, Coelho RF, Palmer KJ, Rocco B (2009) Periurethral suspension stitch during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of the technique and continence outcomes. Eur Urol 56(3):472–478. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2009.06.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Joshi N, de Blok W, van Muilekom E, van der Poel H (2010) Impact of posterior musculofascial reconstruction on early continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: results of a prospective parallel group trial. Eur Urol 58(1):84–89. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2010.03.028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Graefen M, Walz J, Huland H (2006) Open retropubic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 49(1):38–48. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2005.10.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ohori M, Kattan MW, Koh H, Maru N, Slawin KM, Shariat S, Muramoto M, Reuter VE, Wheeler TM, Scardino PT (2004) Predicting the presence and side of extracapsular extension: a nomogram for staging prostate cancer. J Urol 171(5):1844–1849. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000121693.05077.3d discussion 1849

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaul S, Bhandari A, Hemal A, Savera A, Shrivastava A, Menon M (2005) Robotic radical prostatectomy with preservation of the prostatic fascia: a feasibility study. Urology 66(6):1261–1265. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2005.06.107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sacco E, Prayer-Galetti T, Pinto F, Fracalanza S, Betto G, Pagano F, Artibani W (2006) Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: incidence by definition, risk factors and temporal trend in a large series with a long-term follow-up. BJU Int 97(6):1234–1241. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06185.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Abel EJ, Masterson TA, Warner JN, Valentine K, Dechet C (2009) Nerve-sparing prostatectomy and urinary function: a prospective analysis using validated quality-of-life measures. Urology 73(6):1336–1340. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2008.10.077

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Burkhard FC, Kessler TM, Fleischmann A, Thalmann GN, Schumacher M, Studer UE (2006) Nerve sparing open radical retropubic prostatectomy—does it have an impact on urinary continence? J Urol 176(1):189–195. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(06)00574-X

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Eastham JA, Kattan MW, Rogers E, Goad JR, Ohori M, Boone TB, Scardino PT (1996) Risk factors for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 156(5):1707–1713

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Srivastava A, Chopra S, Pham A, Sooriakumaran P, Durand M, Chughtai B, Gruschow S, Peyser A, Harneja N, Leung R, Lee R, Herman M, Robinson B, Shevchuk M, Tewari A (2013) Effect of a risk-stratified grade of nerve-sparing technique on early return of continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 63(3):438–444. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.07.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. von Bodman C, Brock M, Roghmann F, Byers A, Loppenberg B, Braun K, Pastor J, Sommerer F, Noldus J, Palisaar RJ (2013) Intraoperative frozen section of the prostate decreases positive margin rate while ensuring nerve sparing procedure during radical prostatectomy. J Urol 190(2):515–520. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cambio AJ, Evans CP (2006) Minimising postoperative incontinence following radical prostatectomy: considerations and evidence. Eur Urol 50(5):903–913. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2006.08.009 discussion 913

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Stanford JL, Feng Z, Hamilton AS, Gilliland FD, Stephenson RA, Eley JW, Albertsen PC, Harlan LC, Potosky AL (2000) Urinary and sexual function after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study. JAMA 283(3):354–360

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wallerstedt A, Carlsson S, Steineck G, Thorsteinsdottir T, Hugosson J, Stranne J, Wilderang U, Haglind E, Wiklund NP (2012) Patient and tumour-related factors for prediction of urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. Scand J Urol. doi:10.3109/00365599.2012.733410

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sun Y, Zeng Q, Zhang Z, Xu C, Wang Y, He J (2011) Decreased urethral mucosal damage and delayed bacterial colonization during short-term urethral catheterization using a novel trefoil urethral catheter profile in rabbits. J Urol 186(4):1497–1501. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2011.05.043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sedor J, Mulholland SG (1999) Hospital-acquired urinary tract infections associated with the indwelling catheter. Urol Clin N Am 26(4):821–828

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Tiguert R, Rigaud J, Fradet Y (2004) Safety and outcome of early catheter removal after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 63(3):513–517. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2003.10.042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sammon JD, Sharma P, Trinh QD, Ghani KR, Sukumar S, Menon M (2012) Predictors of immediate continence following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. doi:10.1089/end.2012.0312

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Barocas DA, Mitchell R, Chang SS, Cookson MS (2010) Impact of surgeon and hospital volume on outcomes of radical prostatectomy. Urol Oncol 28(3):243–250. doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.03.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Vickers A, Savage C, Bianco F, Mulhall J, Sandhu J, Guillonneau B, Cronin A, Scardino P (2011) Cancer control and functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy as markers of surgical quality: analysis of heterogeneity between surgeons at a single cancer center. Eur Urol 59(3):317–322. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2010.10.045

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Thompson JE, Egger S, Bohm M, Haynes AM, Matthews J, Rasiah K, Stricker PD (2014) Superior quality of life and improved surgical margins are achievable with robotic radical prostatectomy after a long learning curve: a prospective single-surgeon study of 1552 consecutive cases. Eur Urology 65(3):521–531. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2013.10.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical statement

This study was approved by the institutional ethics committee (No. 4381-12). Patients gave written informed consent to record and analyse data. Our study conforms to the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki revised in Tokyo 2008.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jüri R. Palisaar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Palisaar, J.R., Roghmann, F., Brock, M. et al. Predictors of short-term recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy. World J Urol 33, 771–779 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-014-1340-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-014-1340-3

Keywords

Navigation