World Journal of Urology

, Volume 30, Issue 6, pp 747–752 | Cite as

Perugia ileal neobladder: functional results and complications

  • Massimo Porena
  • Luigi Mearini
  • Alessandro Zucchi
  • Michele Del Zingaro
  • Ettore Mearini
  • Antonella Giannantoni
Original Article



To evaluate the long-term functional results and complications of an orthotopic ileal neobladder, defined as perugia ileal neobladder (PIN), in a group of patients with bladder cancer who underwent radical cystectomy (RC).


Between 1993 and 2009, 237 consecutive patients who underwent RC for non-metastatic bladder cancer and orthotopic ileal neobladder reconstruction were enrolled. The neobladder was created using a modified Camey-II technique and consisted of a detubularized ileal loop of 45 cm using a vertical “Y” shape. Complications (<90 days) were reviewed and staged according to Clavien–Dindo classification and evaluated at long-term follow-up. Standard monitoring for cancer recurrence (computerized tomography, bone scan), cystourethrography, urodynamics and frequency/volume charts were performed during follow-up.


The median follow-up was 64 months, and the 5-year overall survival rate was 64 %. Early complications were mostly grade I and II; grade III and IV complications were observed in 27 patients. Perioperative mortality rate was 1.6 %. The most frequent late complications were neobladder–ureteral reflux, urolithiasis and urethral anastomotic stricture. Daytime and nighttime urinary continence were 93.5 and 83.9 %, respectively. All patients were able to completely empty neobladders. Twenty patients were followed up for at least 10 years and presented satisfactory functional results.


Surgical morbidity of RC and orthotopic neobladder was significant; however, the rate of grade III–IV complications was low. The long-term functional results of the PIN were interesting, confirming that appropriate patients’ selection, adequate surgical technique, accurate patients’ counseling and follow-up are essential.


Bladder cancer Ileal neobladder Follow-up Clavien–Dindo Continence Functional results 


  1. 1.
    Hautmann RE, Abol-Enein H, Hafez K et al (2007) Urinary diversion. Urology 6:17–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gakis G, Stenzl A (2010) Ileal neobladder and its variants. Eur Urol Suppl 9:745–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mearini E, Mearini L, Zucchi A, Porena M (2000) Modified Camey II technique. Eur Urol 37(suppl. 2):564Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Porena M, Mearini L, Zucchi A, Mearini E (2000) Ureterointestinal anastomosis in orthotopic neobladders. Urol Int 64:181–184PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stenzl A, Cowan NC, De Santis M et al (2009) The updated EAU guidelines on muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer. Eur Urol 55:815–825PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC et al (1982) Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 5:649–655PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Skinner DG, Lieskovsky G (1987) Management of invasive high-grade bladder cancer. In: Skinner DG, Lieskovsky G (eds) Diagnoses and management of genitourinary cancer. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 295–312Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Studer UE, Burkhard FC, Schumacher M, Kessler TM, Thoeny H, Fleischmann A, Thalmann GN (2006) Twenty years experience with an ileal orthotopic low pressure bladder substitute—lessons to be learned. J Urol 176(1):161–166Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6,336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B et al (1993) The european organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQC30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85:365–376PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lukacz ES, Whitcomb EL, Lawrence JM et al (2007) Are sexual activity and satisfaction affected by pelvic floor disorders? Analysis of a community-based survey. Am J Obstet Gynecol 197:88PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Novara G, Ficarra V, Minja A, De Marco V, Artibani W (2010) Functional results following vescica ileale padovana (VIP) neobladder: midterm follow-up analysis with validated questionnaires. Eur Urol 57(6):1045-1051Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kulkarni JN, Pramesh CS, Rathi S, Pantvaidya GH (2003) Long-term results of orthotopic neobladder reconstruction after radical cystectomy. BJU Int 91:485–488PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Skolarikos A, Deliveliotis C, Alargof E et al (2004) Modified ileal neobladder for continent urinary diversion: functional results after 9 years of experience. J Urol 171:2298–2301PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Granberg CF, Boorjian SA, Crispen PL et al (2008) Functional andoncological outcomes after orthotopic neobladder reconstruction in women. BJU Int 102:1551–1555PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stein JP, Lieskovsky G, Ginsberg DA et al (1998) The T pouch: an orthotopic ileal neobladder incorporating a serosal lined ilealantireflux technique. J Urol 159:1836–1842PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fontana D, Bellina M, Fasolis G, Frea B, Scarpa RM, Mari M, Rolle L, Destefanis P (2004) Y-neobladder: an easy, fast, and reliable procedure. Urology. 63:699–703PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hautmann RE, de Petriconi R, Gottfried HW et al (1999) The ileal neobladder: complications and functional results in 363 patients after 11 years of followup. J Urol 161:422–427PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Madersbacher S, Möhrle K, Burkhard F, Studer UE (2002) Long-term voiding pattern of patients with ileal orthotopic bladder substitutes. J Urol 167:2052–2057PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kassouf W, Hautmann RE, Bochner BH, Lerner SP, Colombo R, Zlotta A, Studer UE (2010) A critical analysis of orthotopic bladder substitutes in adult patients with bladder cancer: Is there a perfect solution? Eur Urol 58:374–383PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lantz AG (2010) Renal and functional outcomes following cystectomy and neobladder reconstruction. Can Urol Assoc J. 4:328–331PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gakis G, Stenzl A (2010) Ileal neobladder and its variants. Eur Urol Suppl 9:745–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Thoeny HC, Sonnenschein MJ, Madersbacher S, Vock P, Studer UE (2002) Is ileal orthotopic bladder substitution with an afferent tubular segment detrimental to the upper urinary tract in the long term? J Urol 168:2030–2034PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Thurairaja R, Studer UE (2008) How to avoid clean intermittent catheterization in men with ileal bladder substitution. J Urol 180:2504–2509PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Porru D, Madeddu G, Campus G, Montisci I, Caddemi G, Scarpa RM et al (1999) Urodynamic analysis of voiding dysfunction in orthotopic ileal neobladder. World J Urol 17:285–289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mikuma N, Hirose T, Yokoo A, Tsukamoto T (1997) Voiding dysfunction in ileal neobladder. J Urol 158:1365–1368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Parekh DJ, Gilbert WB, Smith JA Jr (2000) Functional lower urinary tract voiding outcomes after cystectomy and orthotopic neobladder. J Urol 163:56–58PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Stein JP, Dunn MD, Quek ML, Miranda G, Skinner DG (2004) The orthotopic T pouch ileal bladder substitute: experience with 209 patients. J Urol 172:584–587PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hautmann RE, de Petriconi RC, Volkmer BG (2010) Lessons learned from 1,000 neobladders: the 90-day complication rate. J Urol 184(3):990–994PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Shabsigh A, Korets R, Vora KC, Brooks CM, Cronin AM, Savage C, Raj G, Bochner BH, Dalbagni G, Herr HW, Donat SM (2009) Defining early morbidity of radical cystectomy for patients with bladder cancer using a standardized reporting methodology. Eur Urol 55(1):164–174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Massimo Porena
    • 1
  • Luigi Mearini
    • 1
  • Alessandro Zucchi
    • 1
  • Michele Del Zingaro
    • 1
  • Ettore Mearini
    • 1
  • Antonella Giannantoni
    • 1
  1. 1.Urology DepartmentUniversity of PerugiaPerugiaItaly

Personalised recommendations