Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical outcomes of laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery radical nephrectomy

  • Topic paper
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The conventional laparoscopic surgery is now paving way to the new technologies including robotic and laparoscopic single-site surgery (LESS). We present our updated experience on LESS radical nephrectomy (LESS–RN).

Patients and methods

The data from patients undergoing LESS–RN in our two institutions were reviewed along with various clinical and pathological parameters.

Results

Between 2008 and 2011, 42 LESS–RN were performed (right = 22, left = 20) with mean (range) age and BMI of 63.7 (33–86) years and 25.1 (18–38.6) kg/m2, respectively. In addition to the instruments in the single port, one extra 3-mm needlescopic instrument was required in 19 patients (right = 17, left = 2). In three patients, two additional 5-mm trocars and instruments were required. None required open conversion. The recorded adverse events include one bowel injury (intraoperative closure without the need for stoma), one postoperative bleeding requiring blood transfusion, one prolonged ileus, and one deep venous thrombosis. The resected specimens revealed pT1a (n = 3), pT1b (n = 33), pT2a (n = 4), and pT3b (n = 2) tumors. The finding of pT3b was incidental rather than planned procedure. None of the patients had positive margins.

Conclusion

LESS–RN has proven to be feasible and safe. Beyond cosmesis, further advantages of this approach need to be addressed by randomized trials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fornara P, Doehn C, Friedrich HJ, Jocham D (2001) Nonrandomized comparison of open flank versus laparoscopic nephrectomy in 249 patients with benign renal disease. Eur Urol 40(1):24–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ljungberg B, Cowan NC, Hanbury DC, Hora M, Kuczyk MA, Merseburger AS et al (2010) European association of urology guideline group. 19. EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2010 update. Eur Urol 58(3):398–406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Novick AC (2004) Laparoscopic and partial nephrectomy. Clin Cancer Res 10:6322S–6327S

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gill IS, Meraney AM, Schweizer DK, Savage SS, Hobart MG, Sung GT et al (2001) Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in 100 patients: a single center experience from the United States. Cancer 92:1843–1855

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Saika T, Ono Y, Hattori R, Gotoh M, Kamihira O, Yoshikawa Y et al (2003) Long-term outcome of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for pathologic T1 renal cell carcinoma. Urology 62:1018–1023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wille AH, Roigas J, Deger S, Tullmann M, Turk I, Loening SA (2004) Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: techniques, results and oncological outcome in 125 consecutive cases. Eur Urol 45:483–488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Liatsikos E, Kallidonis P, Kyriazis I, Al-Aown A, Stolzenburg JU (2009) Urologic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery. Nat Rev Urol 6(12):654–659

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stolzenburg JU, Kallidonis P, Till H, Burchardt M, Herrmann TR, Liatsikos EN (2009) Current status of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in urology. World J Urol 27(6):767–773

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stolzenburg JU, Kallidonis P, Hellawell G, Do M, Haefner T, Dietel A, Liatsikos EN (2009) Technique of laparoscopic-endoscopic single-site surgery radical nephrectomy. Eur Urol 56(4):644–650

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Stolzenburg JU, Kallidonis P, Oh MA, Ghulam N, Do M, Haefner T et al (2010) Comparative assessment of laparoscopic single-site surgery instruments to conventional laparoscopic in laboratory setting. J Endourol 24(2):239–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Canes D, Desai MM, Aron M, Haber GP, Goel RK, Stein RJ et al (2008) Transumbilical single-port surgery: evolution and current status. Eur Urol 54(5):1020–1029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Desai MM, Rao PP, Aron M, Pascal-Haber G, Desai MR, Mishra S et al (2008) Scarless single port transumbilical nephrectomy and pyeloplasty: first clinical report. BJU Int 101(1):83–88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rane A, Ahmed S, Kommu SS, Anderson CJ, Rimington PD (2009) Single-port ‘scarless’ laparoscopic nephrectomies: the United Kingdom experience. BJU Int 104(2):230–233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Raman JD, Bensalah K, Bagrodia A, Stern JM, Cadeddu JA (2007) Laboratory and clinical development of single keyhole umbilical nephrectomy. Urology 70(6):1039–1042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Han WK, Park YH, Jeon HG, Jeong W, Rha KH, Choi H et al (2010) The feasibility of laparoendoscopic single-site nephrectomy: initial experience using home-made single-port device. Urology 76(4):862–865

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ponsky LE, Cherullo EE, Sawyer M, Hartke D (2008) Single access site laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: initial clinical experience. J Endourol 22(4):663–666

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ponsky LE, Steinway ML, Lengu IJ, Hartke DM, Vourganti S, Cherullo E (2009) A Pfannenstiel single-site nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy: a practical application of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery. Urology 74(3):482–485

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Desai MM, Berger AK, Brandina R, Aron M, Irwin BH, Canes D et al (2009) Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: initial hundred patients. Urology 74(4):805–812

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. White WM, Haber GP, Goel RK, Crouzet S, Stein RJ, Kaouk JH (2009) Single-port urological surgery: single-center experience with the first 100 cases. Urology 74(4):801–804

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Choi KH, Ham WS, Rha KH, Lee JW, Jeon HG, Arkoncel FR et al (2011) Laparoendoscopic single-site surgeries: a single-center experience of 171 consecutive cases. Korean J Urol 52(1):31–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Raman JD, Bagrodia A, Cadeddu JA (2009) Single-incision, umbilical laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes and short-term measures of convalescence. Eur Urol 55(5):1198–1204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Raybourn JH 3rd, Rane A, Sundaram CP (2010) Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for nephrectomy as a feasible alternative to traditional laparoscopy. Urology 75(1):100–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Seo IY, Lee JW, Rim JS (2011) Laparoendoscopic single-site radical nephrectomy: a comparison with conventional laparoscopy. J Endourol 25(3):465–469

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Park YH, Park JH, Jeong CW, Kim HH (2010) Comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site radical nephrectomy with conventional laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for localized renal-cell carcinoma. J Endourol 24(6):997–1003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tugcu V, Ilbey YO, Mutlu B, Tasci AI (2010) Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus standard laparoscopic simple nephrectomy: a prospective randomized study. J Endourol 24(8):1315–1320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kurien A, Rajapurkar S, Sinha L, Mishra S, Ganpule A, Muthu V et al (2011) Standard laparoscopic donor nephrectomy versus laparoendoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy: a randomized comparative study. J Endourol 25(3):365–370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Stolzenburg JU, Hellawell G, Kallidonis P, Do M, Haefner T, Dietel A et al (2009) Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: early experience with tumor nephrectomy. J Endourol 23:1287–1292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Stolzenburg JU, Do M, Haefner T, Dietel A, Kallidonis P, Kyriazis I et al (2011) Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery radical nephrectomy. J Endourol 25(2):159–165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evangelos N. Liatsikos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stolzenburg, JU., Kallidonis, P., Ragavan, N. et al. Clinical outcomes of laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery radical nephrectomy. World J Urol 30, 589–596 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-011-0765-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-011-0765-1

Keywords

Navigation