Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Robotic management of complicated ureteropelvic junction obstruction

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the feasibility and outcomes of robotic pyeloplasty for complicated cases of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO).

Methods

Complicated UPJO cases included patients with the following: concomitant multiple or calyceal stones, secondary UPJO (post-ureteroscopy, open or percutaneous surgery), malrotated kidney, horseshoe kidney, ectopic kidney, giant hydronephrosis, poorly functioning kidney (glomerular filtration rate <20 ml/min), non-redundant renal calyces (requiring nephroplication), ptosis of the kidney (requiring nephropexy), long stricture (>2 cm), age <5 or >60 years and duplex pelvis. All cases underwent dismembered robotic pyeloplasty. Data were collected for operative time, blood loss, stone clearance, analgesic usage and time to recovery. Follow-up was done with intravenous urography and dynamic renal scan.

Results

A total of 29 cases underwent dismembered robotic pyeloplasty with an average operative time and blood loss of 130 min and 50 ml. Stone clearance could be achieved in 8 out of 10. The average follow-up period was 15 months with a symptomatic and objective success rate of 96.6% (28/29). No perioperative complications were noted.

Conclusions

Robotic pyeloplasty for complicated cases of UPJO is feasible, safe and effective, and has a durable success rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schwentner C, Pelzer A, Neururer R, Springer B, Horninger W, Bartsch G, Peschel R (2007) Robotic Anderson–Hynes pyeloplasty: 5-year experience of one centre. BJU Int 100(4):880–885

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Peters CA (2008) Robotic pyeloplasty: the new standard of care? J Urol 180(4):1223–1224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Patel V (2005) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. Urology 66(1):45–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hemal AK, Mishra S, Mukharjee S, Suryavanshi M (2008) Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in patients of ureteropelvic junction obstruction with previously failed open surgical repair. Int J Urol 15(8):744–746

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Atug F, Castle EP, Burgess SV, Thomas R (2005) Concomitant management of renal calculi and pelvi–ureteric junction obstruction with robotic laparoscopic surgery. BJU Int 96(9):1365–1368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mufarrij PW, Woods M, Shah OD, Palese MA, Berger AD, Thomas R, Stifelman MD (2008) Robotic dismembered pyeloplasty: a 6-year, multi-institutional experience. J Urol 180(4):1391–1396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pe ML, Sterious SN, Liu JB, Lallas CD (2008) Robotic dismembered pyeloplasty in a horseshoe kidney after failed endopyelotomy. JSLS 12(2):210–212

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Boylu U, Lee BR, Thomas R (2009) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty and nephropexy for ureteropelvic junction obstruction and nephroptosis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A [Epub ahead of print]

  9. Casale P, Mucksavage P, Resnick M, Kim SS (2008) Robotic ureterocalicostomy in the pediatric population. J Urol 180(6):2643–2648

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gupta NP, Mukherjee S, Nayyar R, Hemal AK, Kumar R (2009) Transmesocolic robot-assisted pyeloplasty: single center experience. J Endourol 23(6):945–948

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bove P, Ong AM, Rha KH, Pinto P, Jarrett TW, Kavoussi LR (2004) Laparoscopic management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in patients with upper urinary tract anomalies. J Urol 171(1):77–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jindal L, Gupta AK, Mumtaz F, Sunder R, Hemal AK (2006) Laparoscopic nephroplication and nephropexy as an adjunct to pyeloplasty in UPJO with giant hydronephrosis. Int Urol Nephrol 38(3–4):443–446

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Belman AB, Rushton HG (2007) Kidney folding: the Y-plasty, a means of creating a dependent ureteropelvic junction in the child with giant hydronephrosis. J Urol 178(1):255–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gupta DK, Chandrasekharam VV, Srinivas M, Bajpai M (2001) Percutaneous nephrostomy in children with ureteropelvic junction obstruction and poor renal function. Urology 57(3):547–550

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Metzelder ML, Petersen C, Ure BM (2007) Laparoscopic pyeloplasty is feasible for lower pole pelvi-ureteric obstruction in duplex systems. Pediatr Surg Int 23(9):907–909

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kutikov A, Nguyen M, Guzzo T, Canter D, Casale P (2006) Robot-assisted pyeloplasty in the infant: lessons learned. J Urol 176(5):2237–2239 (discussion 2239–2240)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gulur DM, Young JG, Painter DJ, Keeley FX Jr, Timoney AG (2008) How successful is the conservative management of pelvi–ureteric junction obstruction in adults? BJU Int. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08192.x

  18. Boylu U, Oommen M, Lee BR, Thomas R (2009) Ureteropelvic junction obstruction secondary to crossing vessels: to transpose or not? The robotic experience. J Urol [Epub ahead of print]

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Narmada P. Gupta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nayyar, R., Gupta, N.P. & Hemal, A.K. Robotic management of complicated ureteropelvic junction obstruction. World J Urol 28, 599–602 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-009-0469-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-009-0469-y

Keywords

Navigation