Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Measuring urgency in clinical practice

  • Topic Paper
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The study of urinary urgency is challenging for a number of reasons, including our lack of understanding of the normal physiology of urinary sensation and the pathophysiology of abnormal sensation. Issues with nomenclature and lack of agreement about the nature of the experience of normal and abnormal urinary sensation add to this difficulty.

Materials and methods

Review of published literature and critique.

Results

Currently available tools for measurement of urgency include validated questionnaires that describe the severity of urgency and its impact on quality of life, modified bladder diaries, body maps of urgency, and measures of urinary sensation during filling cystometry. All these provide some information about the experience of urinary urgency, but no single measure currently captures its multidimensional nature.

Conclusions

Measurement of urgency in clinical practice and indeed the optimal treatment strategy has yet to come of age.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dmochowski R (2008) On syndromes, symptoms, and root cause. Eur Urol 54(2):256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chapple CR, Wein AJ (2005) The urgency of the problem and the problem of urgency in the overactive bladder. BJU Int 95(3):274–275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chapple CR, Artibani W, Cardozo LD et al (2005) The role of urinary urgency and its measurement in the overactive bladder symptom syndrome: current concepts and future prospects. BJU Int 95(3):335–340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. De Wachter S, Wyndaele JJ (2008) How sudden is a compelling desire to void? An observational cystometric study on the suddenness of this sensation. BJU Int 101(8):1000–1003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Abrams P (2005) Urgency: the key to defining the overactive bladder. BJU Int 96(Suppl 1):1–3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wyndaele JJ, De Wachter S (2008) Urgency in overactive bladder: translating experimental data into clinical practice. Drugs Today (Barc) 44(5):381–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Starkman JS, Dmochowski RR (2008) Urgency assessment in the evaluation of overactive bladder (OAB). Neurourol Urodyn 27(1):13–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Homma Y, Yoshida M, Seki N et al (2006) Symptom assessment tool for overactive bladder syndrome—overactive bladder symptom score. Urology 68(2):318–323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Coyne K, Revicki D, Hunt T et al (2002) Psychometric validation of an overactive bladder symptom and health-related quality of life questionnaire: the OAB-q. Qual Life Res 11(6):563–574

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Matza LS, Thompson CL, Krasnow J et al (2005) Test-retest reliability of four questionnaires for patients with overactive bladder: the overactive bladder questionnaire (OAB-q), patient perception of bladder condition (PPBC), urgency questionnaire (UQ), and the primary OAB symptom questionnaire (POSQ). Neurourol Urodyn 24(3):215–225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products, Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products, Note for guidance on the clinical investigation of medicinal products for the treatment of urinary incontinence in women. November 2001

  12. Dmochowski R, Heit M, Sand P (2003) The effect of anticholingergic therapy on urgency severity in patients with overactive bladder: clinical assessment of a newly validated tool. Neurourol Urodyn 22(5):411–412 Abstract 33

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nixon A, Colman S, Sabounjian L et al (2005) A validated patient reported measure of urinary urgency severity in overactive bladder for use in clinical trials. J Urol 174(2):604–607

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Freeman R, Hill S, Millard R et al (2003) Reduced perception of urgency in treatment of overactive bladder with extended-release tolteridine. Obstet Gyn 102:605–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cardozo L, Coyne KS, Versi E (2005) Validation of the urgency perception scale. BJU Int 95:591–596

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Blaivas JG, Panagopoulos G, Weiss JP et al (2007) The urgency perception score: validation and test–retest. J Urol 177(1):199–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cardozo L, Dewilde T, Feyereisl J et al (2006) Solifenacin significantly reduces both urgency severity and bother: results from the flexible dose, placebo controlled, multinational SUNRISE study. Neurourol Urodyn 25(6):655 Abstr 281

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rackley R, Weiss JP, Rovner ES et al (2006) Night time dosing with tolterodine reduces overactive bladder-related nocturnal micturitions in patients with overactive bladder and nocturia. Urology 67:731–736

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products, Note for guidance on the clinical investigation of medicinal products for the treatment of urinary incontinence. CPMP/EWP/18/01. EMEA (European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products), 2002, London

  20. Landis JR, Kaplan S, Swift S et al (2003) Impact of urge incontinence severity on drug treatment efficacy. In: International continence society 33rd annual congress, Florence, Italy. https://www.icsoffice.org/publications/2003/PDF/118.PDF. Abstract 118

  21. Yalcin I, Bump RC (2003) Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189(1):98–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Coyne KS, Matza LS, Kopp Z et al (2006) The validation of the patient perception of bladder condition (ppbc): a single-item global measure for patients with overactive bladder. Eur Urol 49:1079–1086

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Basra R, Artibani W, Cardozo L et al (2007) Design and validation of a new screening instrument for lower urinary tract dysfunction: the bladder control self-assessment questionnaire (B-SAQ). Eur Urol 52(1):230–237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Coyne KS, Zyczynski T, Margolis MK et al (2005) Validation of an overactive bladder awareness tool for use in primary care settings. Adv Ther 22(4):381–394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Reese PR, Pleil AM, Okano GJ et al (2003) Multinational study of reliability and validity of the King’s Health Questionnaire in patients with overactive bladder. Qual Life Res 12(4):427–442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Abrams P, Klevmark B (1996) Frequency volume charts: an indispensable part of lower urinary tract assessment. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl 179:47–53

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Brown JS, McNaughton KS, Wyman JF et al (2003) Measurement characteristics of a voiding diary for use by men and women with overactive bladder. Urology 61(4):802–809

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Naoemova I, De Wachter S, Wuyts FL et al (2008) Reliability of the 24-h sensation-related bladder diary in women with urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19(7):955–959

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Naoemova I, De Wachter S, Wyndaele JJ (2008) Comparison of sensation-related voiding patterns between continent and incontinent women: A study with a 3-day sensation-related bladder diary (SR-BD). Neurourol Urodyn 27(6):511–514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cardozo L, Prescott K, Serdarevic D et al (2003) Can medication prolong warning time? Neurourol Urodyn 22:468–469

    Google Scholar 

  31. Cardozo L, Dixon A (2005) Increased warning time with darifenacin: A new concept in the management of urinary urgency. J Urol 173:1214–1218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Miller JR, Botros SM, Aschkenazi SO et al (2006) Urgency on bladder palpation as a predictor of detrusor overactivity. Int Urogynecol J 17(Suppl 2):S67 (Abstract 016)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wyndaele JJ (1998) The normal pattern of perception of bladder filling during cystometry studied in 38 young healthy volunteers. J Urol 160(2):479–481

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. De Wachter S, Wyndaele JJ (2003) Frequency–volume charts: a tool to evaluate bladder sensation. Neurourol Urodyn 22(7):638–642

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Naoemova I, De Wachter S, Wuyts FL et al (2008) Do sensation-related bladder diaries differ between patients with urodynamically confirmed and non-objectivised urinary incontinence? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19(2):213–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Erdem E, Akbay E, Doruk E et al (2004) How reliable are bladder perceptions during cystometry? Neurourol Urodyn 23:306–309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. De Wachter S, Van Meel TD, Wyndaele JJ (2008) Can a faked cystometry deceive patients in their perception of filling sensations? A study on the reliability of spontaneously reported cystometric filling sensations in patients with non-neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn 27(5):395–398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Oliver S, Fowler C, Mundy A et al (2003) Measuring the sensations of urge and bladder filling during cystometry in urge incontinence and the effects of neuromodulation. Neurourol Urodyn 22(1):7–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Dompeyre P, Fritel X, Bader G et al (2007) Bladder sensitivity testing using a visual analogue scale: comparative cystometric study on women. Neurourol Urodyn 26:350–355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lowenstein L, FitzGerald MP, Kenton K et al (2008) Validation of a real-time urodynamic measure of urinary sensation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 198(6):661.e1–661.e4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Phull H, Hijaz A, Goldman H, Rackley R, Vasavada S, Daneshgari F et al (2008) Role of urodynamics on clinical decision-making in patients with urinary incontinence and voiding dysfunction. AUA meeting. http://www.abstracts2view.com/aua/. Abstract 1420

  42. Seckiner I, Yesilli C, Mungan A et al (2007) Correlations between the ICIQ-SF score and urodynamic findings. Neurourol Urodyn 26:492–494

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Diggs C, Meyer WA, Langenberg P, Greenberg P, Horne L, Warren JW (2007) Assessing urgency in interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome. Urology 69(2):210–214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. FitzGerald MP, Kenton KS, Brubaker L (2005) Localization of the urge to void in patients with painful bladder syndrome. Neurourol Urodyn 24(7):633–637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

Roger R. Dmochowski has acted as a consultant to Astellas, Allergan, Novartis, Pfizer and Watson. Mary P. FitzGerald and Jean-Jacques Wyndaele have no conflicts to disclose within the last 12 months.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roger R. Dmochowski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dmochowski, R.R., FitzGerald, M.P. & Wyndaele, JJ. Measuring urgency in clinical practice. World J Urol 27, 739–745 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-009-0467-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-009-0467-0

Keywords

Navigation