Skip to main content
Log in

Endoscopic inguinal lymph node dissection for penile carcinoma: the developing of a novel technique

  • Topic Paper
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript



The present article discusses endoscopic approach for inguinal lymphadenectomy in penile carcinoma (ELPC): its arrival to urological practice, development, accomplishments, and future endeavors. Our aim is to highlight the development of this novel technique, which offers a possible option for a less morbid surgical approach.


Review of the available medical literature in ELPC.


Regional surgical therapy constitutes a mainstay element of therapeutics for penile carcinoma. Elevated morbidity remains an issue for the traditional surgical approach. Endoscopic lymphadenectomy for penile carcinoma emerged as surgical option to accomplish cancer objectives while avoiding substantial morbidity.


Endoscopic approach for inguinal lymphadenectomy in penile carcinoma is still in a developing stage in which it is mandatory to evaluate larger series of patients with longer follow-up. Initial series present promising results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others


  1. Rodriguez A, Pow-Sang JM (2006) Laparoscopic surgery in urologic oncology. Cancer Control 13(3):169–178

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Greene FL, Kercher KW, Nelson H, Teigland CM, Boller AM (2007) Minimal access cancer management. CA Cancer J Clin 57(3):130–146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Finelli A, Moinzadeh A, Singh D, Ramani AP, Desai MM, Gill IS (2004) Critique of laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in genitourinary oncology. Urol Oncol 22(3):246–254

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sánchez-Ortiz RF, Pettaway CA (2004) The role of lymphadenectomy in penile cancer. Urol Oncol 22(3):236–244

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mosconi AM, Roila F, Gatta G, Theodore C (2005) Cancer of the penis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 53(2):165–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cabanas RM (1977) An approach for the treatment of penile carcinoma. Cancer 39:456–466

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Horenblas S (2001) Lymphadenectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. Part 1: diagnosis of lymph node metastasis. BJU Int 88(5):467–472

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Horenblas S (2001) Lymphadenectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. Part 2: the role and technique of lymph node dissection. BJU Int 88(5):473–483

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. van Velthoven RF, Hoffmann P (2006) Methods for laparoscopic training using animal models. Curr Urol Rep 7(2):114–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mathevet P, Schettini S, Roy M et al (2002) Inguinoscopy or video-endoscopic lymph node dissection. The trocar. J Gynecol Surg Endosc, Jan 2nd (Online Video)

  11. Bishoff JT, Basler JW, Teichman JM et al (2003) Endoscopic subcutaneous modified inguinal lymph node dissection (ESMIL) for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. J Urol (Abstract # 301)

  12. Tobias-Machado M, Tavares A, Molina WR et al (2006) Video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL): minimally invasive resection of inguinal lymph nodes. Int Braz J Urol 32(3):316–321

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sotelo R, Sánchez-Salas R, Carmona O, Garcia A, Mariano M, Neiva G, Trujillo G, Novoa J, Cornejo F, Finelli A (2007) Endoscopic lymphadenectomy for penile carcinoma. J Endourol 21(4):364–367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Algaba F, Horenblas S, Pizzocaro Luigi Piva G, Solsona E, Windahl T (2002) T Urology EAo. EAU guidelines on penile cancer. Eur Urol 42(3):199–203

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Catalona WJ (1988) A modified inguinal lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the penis with preservation of saphenous veins: technique and preliminary results. J Urol 140:306–310

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Colberg JW, Andriole GL, Catalona WJ (1997) Long-term follow-up of men undergoing modified inguinal lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the penis. Br J Urol 79(1):54–57

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Assimos DG, Jarow JP (1994) Role of laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection in the management of patients with penile cancer and inguinal adenopathy. J Endourol 8(5):365–369

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gallo Rolania FJ, Beneitez Alvarez ME, Izquierdo García FM (2002) The role of inguinal lymphadenectomy in epidermoid carcinoma of the penis. Use of Ligasure and analysis of the results. Arch Esp Urol 55(5):535–538

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kajiyama Y, Iwanuma Y, Tomita N, Amano T, Hattori K, Tsurumaru M (2005) Sealing the thoracic duct with ultrasonic coagulating shears. Hepatogastroenterology 52(64):1053–1056

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ohtsuka T, Nimomiya M, Kobayashi J, Kaneko Y (2005) VATS thoracic-duct division for aortic surgery-related chylous leakage. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 27(1):153–155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Adwani A, Ebbs SR (2006) Ultracision reduces acute blood loss but not seroma formation after mastectomy and axillary dissection: a pilot study. Int J Clin Pract 60(5):562–564

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Herr HW (2007) The concept of lymph node density—is it ready for clinical practice? J Urol 177(4):1273–1275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lont AP, Kroon BK, Gallee MP, van Tinteren H, Moonen LM, Horenblas S (2007) Pelvic lymph node dissection for penile carcinoma: extent of inguinal lymph node involvement as an indicator for pelvic lymph node involvement and survival. J Urol 177(3):947–952

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tobias-Machado M, Tavares A, Ornellas AA, Molina WR Jr, Juliano RV, Wroclawski ER (2007) Video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy: a new minimally invasive procedure for radical management of inguinal nodes in patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma. J Urol 177(3):953–957

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tobias-Machado M, Tavares A, Silva MN, Molina WR Jr, Forseto PH, Juliano RV, Wroclawski ER (2008) Can video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy achieve a lower morbidity than open lymph node dissection in penile cancer patients? J Endourol 22(8):1687–1691

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Misra S, Chaturvedi A, Misra NC (2004) Penile carcinoma: a challenge for the developing world. Lancet Oncol 5(4): 240–247

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kaouk JH, Gill IS (2003) Laparoscopic reconstructive urology. J Urol 170:1070–1073

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Leijte JA, Kroon BK, Valdés Olmos RA, Nieweg OE, Horenblas S (2007) Reliability and safety of current dynamic sentinel node biopsy for penile carcinoma. Eur Urol 52(1):170–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Spiess PE, Izawa JI, Bassett R, Kedar D, Busby JE, Wong F, Eddings T, Tamboli P, Pettaway CA (2007) Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and dynamic sentinel node biopsy for staging penile cancer: results with pathological correla. J Urol 177:2157–2161

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

There is no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to René Sotelo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sotelo, R., Sanchez-Salas, R. & Clavijo, R. Endoscopic inguinal lymph node dissection for penile carcinoma: the developing of a novel technique. World J Urol 27, 213–219 (2009).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: