Murphy W (1990) Current status of urinary cytology in evaluation of bladder neoplasms. Hum Pathol 21:886–896
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Umiker W (1964) Accuracy of cytological diagnosis of cancer of the urinary tract. Acta Cytol 8:186–196
Google Scholar
Raitanen MP, Aine R, Rintala E, Kallio J, Rajala P, Juusela H, Tammela TLJ, FinnBladder Group (2002) Differences between local and review urinary cytology in diagnosis of bladder cancer. An interobserver multicenter analysis. Eur Urol 41(3):284–289
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Sarosdy M, Hudson M, Ellis WJ, Soloway MS, deVere White R, Sheinfeld J, Jarowenko MV, Schellhammer PF, Schervish EW, Patel JV, Chodak GW, Lamm DL, Johnson RD, Henderson M, Adams G, Blumenstein BA, Thoelke KR, Pfalzgraf RD, Murchison HA, Brunelle SL (1997) Improved detection of recurrent bladder cancer using the Bard BTA stat Test. Urology 50:349–353
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Glas AS, Roos D, Deutekom M, Zwinderman AH, Bossuyt PM, Kurth KH (2003) Tumor markers in the diagnosis of primary bladder cancer. A systematic review. J Urol 169(6):1975–1982
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Raitanen M-P, Marttila T, Kaasinen E, Rintala E, Aine R, Tammela TLJ, Finnbladder group (2000) Sensitivity of human complement factor H related protein (the BTA stat Test) test and voided urine cytology in the diagnosis of bladder cancer. J Urol 163:1689
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Pode D, Shapiro A, Wald M, Nativ O, Laufer M, Kaver I (1999) Noninvasive detection of bladder cancer with the BTA stat test. J Urol 161:443–446
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Boman H, Hedelin H, Holmäng S (2002) Four bladder tumor markers have a disappointingly low sensitivity for small size and low grade recurrence. J Urol 167:80–83
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Raitanen M-P, Tammela TLJ (1999) Specificity of human complement factor H related protein test (Bard BTA stat test). Scand J Urol Nephrol 33:234–236
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Sharma S, Zippe CD, Pandrangi L, Nelson D, Agarwal A (1999) Exclusion criteria enhance the specificity and positive predictive value of NMP22 and BTA stat. J Urol 162:53–57
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Oge O, Atsü N, Sahin A, Ozen H (2000) Comparison of BTA stat and NMP 22 tests in the detection of bladder cancer. Scand J Urol Nephrol 34(6):349–351
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Raitanen M-P, Marttila T, Nurmi M, Ala-Opas M, Nieminen P, Aine R, Tammela TLJ, Finnbladder group (2001) Human complement factor H related protein (BTA stat) test in monitoring of bladder cancer. J Urol 165:374–377
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Raitanen MP, Kaasinen E, Lukkarinen O, Kauppinen R, Viitanen J, Liukkonen T, Tammela TLJ, Finbladder group (2001) Analysis of false-positive BTA stat test result in patients followed-up for bladder cancer 57(4):680–684
CAS
Google Scholar
Raitanen M-P, Hellström P, Marttila T, Korhonen H, Talja M, Ervasti J, Tammela TLJ, The Finnbaldder Group (2001) Effect of intravesical instillation on human complement factor H related protein (BTA stat) test. Eur Urol 40:422–426
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Leyh H, Marberger M, Conort P, Sternberg C, Pansadoro V, Pagano F, Bassi P, Boccon-Gipod L, Ravery V, Treiber U (1999) Comparison of the BTA stat Test with voided urine cytology and bladder wash cytology in the diagnosis and monitoring of baldder cancer. Eur Urol 35:1:52–56
Article
Google Scholar
Toma MI, Friedrich MG, Hautmann SH, Jäkel KT, Erbersdobler A, Hellstern A, Huland H (2004) Comparison of the ImmunoCyt test and urinary cytology with other urine tests in the detection and surveillance of bladder cancer. World J Urol 22:145–149
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Schmitz-Dräger BJ, Tirsar L-A, Schmitz-Dräger C, Dörsam J, Mellan Z, Bismarck E, Ebert T (2007) Immunocytology in the assessment of patients with asymptomatic hematuria. World J Urol. doi:10.1007/s00345-007-0228-x
Raitanen MP, Kaasinen E, Rintala E, Hansson E, Nieminen P, Aine R, Tammela TLJ, The Finnbladder group (2001) Prognostic utility of human complement factor H related protein test (the BTA stat Test). Br J Cancer 85(4):552–556
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar