Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The rationale for radical cystectomy as primary therapy for T4 bladder cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Treatment of T4 bladder cancer patients remains a clinical challenge. Conservative management is often insufficient regarding local control, neoadjuvant chemotherapy delays definite treatment while leading to increased therapy-associated morbidity and mortality during the course of the disease. Primary cystectomy has also been reported to be associated with a high complication rate and unsatisfactory clinical efficacy. Herein, we report postoperative outcome, including therapy-related complications, in 20 T4 bladder cancer patients subjected to primary cystectomy. Twenty patients underwent radical cystectomy for T4 bladder cancer. At the time of surgery, 8 patients had regional lymph node metastases. The median postoperative follow-up was 13 months for the whole group. Mean duration of postoperative hospitalization was 19 days. Ten patients received no intra- or postoperative blood transfusions, whereas an average number of 3 blood units were administered in the remaining cases. Major therapy-associated complications were paresthesia affecting the lower extremities (n = 3) as well as insignificant pulmonary embolism, enterocutaneous fistulation and acute renal failure in one patient, respectively. At the time of data evaluation, 11 patients were still alive after a follow-up of 20 months. Four patients ≥70 years at the time of cystectomy were still alive after 11, 22 and 31 months following surgery, respectively. The current data demonstrate primary cystectomy for T4 bladder cancer as a technically feasible approach that is associated with a tolerable therapy-related morbidity. Additionally, satisfying clinical outcome is observed even in a substantial number of elderly patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Skinner DG, Stein JP, Lieskovsky G, Skinner EC, Boyd SD, Figueroa A et al (1998) 25-year experience in the management of invasive bladder cancer by radical cystectomy. Eur Urol 33(Suppl 4):25–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Figueroa AJ, Stein JP, Dickinson M, Skinner EC, Thangathurai D, Mikhail MS et al (1998) Radical cystectomy for elderly patients with bladder carcinoma: an updated experience with 404 patients. Cancer 83(1):141–147

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zebic N, Weinknecht S, Kroepfl D (2005) Radical cystectomy in patients aged > or = 75 years: an updated review of patients treated with curative and palliative intent. BJU Int 95(9):1211–1214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rodel C, Grabenbauer GG, Kuhn R, Papadopoulos T, Dunst J, Meyer M et al (2002) Combined-modality treatment and selective organ preservation in invasive bladder cancer: long-term results. J Clin Oncol 20(14):3061–3071

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dunst J, Diestelhorst A, Kuhn R, Muller AC, Scholz HJ, Fornara P (2005) Organ-sparing treatment in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 181(10):632–637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Arias F, Dominguez MA, Martinez E, Illarramendi JJ, Miquelez S, Pascual I et al (2000) Chemoradiotherapy for muscle invading bladder carcinoma. Final report of a single institutional organ-sparing program. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 47(2):373–378

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen WC, Liaw CC, Chuang CK, Chen MF, Chen CS, Lin PY, et al. (2003) Concurrent cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and radiotherapy for invasive bladder cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 56(3):726–733

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tekin A, Aki FT, Ozen H (2001) Radical cystectomy versus alternative treatments for muscle-confined bladder cancer. Int Urol Nephrol 33(2):357–362

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wilson JR, Urwin GH, Stower MJ (2005) The role of percutaneous nephrostomy in malignant ureteric obstruction. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 87(1):21–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lodde M, Palermo S, Comploj E, Signorello D, Mian C, Lusuardi L et al (2005) Four years experience in bladder preserving management for muscle invasive bladder cancer. Eur Urol 47(6):773–778; discussion 778–9

    Google Scholar 

  11. George L, Bladou F, Bardou VJ, Gravis G, Tallet A, Alzieu C et al (2004) Clinical outcome in patients with locally advanced bladder carcinoma treated with conservative multimodality therapy. Urology 64(3):488–493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Douglas RM, Kaufman DS, Zietman AL, Althausen AF, Heney NM, Shipley WU (1996) Conservative surgery, patient selection, and chemoradiation as organ-preserving treatment for muscle-invading bladder cancer. Semin Oncol 23(5):614–620

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mantadakis E, Panagiotidis C, Delakas D, Samonis G (2003) Symptomatic relief of patients with advanced bladder carcinoma after regional intra-arterial chemotherapy. Anticancer Res 23(6D):5143–5147

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hussain MH, Glass TR, Forman J, Sakr W, Smith DC, Al-Sarraf M et al (2001) Combination cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil and radiation therapy for locally advanced unresectable or medically unfit bladder cancer cases: a Southwest Oncology Group Study. J Urol 165(1):56–60; discussion 60–1

    Google Scholar 

  15. Grossman HB, Natale RB, Tangen CM, Speights VO, Vogelzang NJ, Trump DL, deVere White RW, Sarosdy MF, Wood DP, Raghavan D, Crawford ED (2003) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus cystectomy compared with cystectomy alone for locally advanced bladder cancer. N Engl J Med 349:859–866

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hautmann RE (1998) Complications and results after cystectomy in male and female patients with locally invasive bladder cancer. Eur Urol 33(Suppl 4):23–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Teramukai S, Nishiyama H, Matsui Y, Ogawa O, Fukushima M (2006) Evaluation for surrogacy of end points by using data from observational studies: tumor downstaging for evaluating neoadjuvant chemotherapy in invasive bladder cancer. Clin Cancer Res 12(1):139–143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cam K, Yildirim A, Ozveri H, Turkeri L, Akdas A (2002) The efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in invasive bladder cancer. Int Urol Nephrol 33(1):49–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Nieuwenhuijzen JA, Horenblas S, Meinhardt W, van Tinteren H, Moonen LM (2004) Salvage cystectomy after failure of interstitial radiotherapy and external beam radiotherapy for bladder cancer. BJU Int 94(6):793–797

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Markus A. Kuczyk.

Additional information

U. Nagele and A. G. Anastasiadis have contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nagele, U., Anastasiadis, A.G., Merseburger, A.S. et al. The rationale for radical cystectomy as primary therapy for T4 bladder cancer. World J Urol 25, 401–405 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-007-0172-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-007-0172-9

Keywords

Navigation