Skip to main content
Log in

Gender discrepancies in the diagnosis of renal cortical tumors

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is more common in men than women although the relationship between sex and histologic sub-type of RCC is unknown. The Columbia University Urologic Oncology Database of 1,105 patients who underwent nephrectomy from 1990–2005 was reviewed. 1,018 patients were included who underwent renal surgery with complete demographic data and post-operative pathologic information; 49 with incomplete information and 36 with “granular” histology were excluded. Differences in histology, size and volume of primary tumor, laterality, chief complaint, age, pathologic stage and status were evaluated by sex using ANOVA techniques. The cohort included 671 (66.1%) men and 344 (33.8%) women. There were no differences in age (61.0 vs. 60.7 years, P = 0.36), size (6.22 vs. 5.53 cm, P = 0.08) or volume (305 vs. 129cc, P = 0.07) of primary tumor. Men were more likely to have bilateral tumors (9.6 vs. 3.5%, P = 0.003). A greater percentage of men had malignant pathologic histology at nephrectomy (90.9 vs. 84.0%, P = 0.002). The rate of malignancy for women increased from 44.5% for tumors < 1 cm to 92.7% for tumors greater than 10 cm; there was no trend noted in men. Women had a greater percentage of conventional RCC (77.2 vs. 70.5%, P = 0.04). When analyzed by histologic sub-type, men were more likely to have papillary histology than women (17.4 vs. 4.5%), women were more likely to have chromophobe histology (11.2 vs. 5.0%; P = 0.006). Differences in demographics, pathologic parameters and histologic sub-typing are observed between men and women treated for renal masses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. The American Cancer Society (2006) Cancer facts and figures. Atlanta, p 56

  2. Campbell MF, Walsh PC (1998) Campbell's urology, 7th edn. W.B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, pp 3 v (xli, 3432, lxxxix p)

  3. Chow WH, Gridley G, Fraumeni JF Jr et al (2000) Obesity, hypertension, and the risk of kidney cancer in men. N Engl J Med 343:1305

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kovacs G, Akhtar M, Beckwith BJ et al (1997) The Heidelberg classification of renal cell tumours. J Pathol 183:131

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hruby G, Reisiger K, Venkatesh R et al (2006) Comparison of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and laparoscopic cryoablation for renal hilar tumors. Urology 67:50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lau WK, Cheville JC, Blute ML et al (2002) Prognostic features of pathologic stage T1 renal cell carcinoma after radical nephrectomy. Urology 59:532

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Frank I, Blute ML, Cheville JC et al (2003) Solid renal tumors: an analysis of pathological features related to tumor size. J Urol 170:2217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Amin MB, Amin MB, Tamboli P et al (2002) Prognostic impact of histologic subtyping of adult renal epithelial neoplasms: an experience of 405 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 26:281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mancilla-Jimenez R, Stanley RJ, Blath RA (1976) Papillary renal cell carcinoma: a clinical, radiologic, and pathologic study of 34 cases. Cancer 38:2469

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James M. McKiernan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pierorazio, P.M., Murphy, A.M., Benson, M.C. et al. Gender discrepancies in the diagnosis of renal cortical tumors. World J Urol 25, 81–85 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-006-0124-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-006-0124-9

Keywords

Navigation