Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A new technique combining both polypropylene and vaginal wall sling procedures: can it minimize the risk of urethral and vaginal erosion occurring with synthetic materials?

  • Free Paper
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We describe a new technique combining in situ vaginal wall and polypropylene mesh slings that may decrease potential erosive complications caused by synthetic materials. A folded mucosal patch harboring the polypropylene mesh was placed between mid-urethra and bladder neck. Using this technique, 12 consecutive women (age range 44–66 years) were operated. Preoperative evaluation included a detailed history, pelvic examination, stress test, cystourethroscopy, basic urodynamic evaluation (cystometry, Valsalva leak point pressure measurement), and urine culture. Based on these evaluations, three, seven, and two patients had type I, II, and III stress urinary incontinence, respectively. A paraurethral cyst excision was carried out in one patient and anterior colporrhaphy in four patients during the same operation. No ischemia or sloughing at the operation site occurred in any case. Pelvic examination was repeated in all patients after 3 and 6 months of follow-up and symptoms were determined after 12 months of follow-up in eight patients by telephone interview. Average follow-up was 10 months (range: 6–14 months). None of the patients were incontinent, or complained of sexual dysfunction or erosive complications after 1 year. Since there are two distinct barriers between the sling and both urethra and vagina, our technique covers all advantages of a sling procedure with synthetic materials and avoids the risk of urethral and vaginal erosion. The other advantage of this technique is the concomitant utilization of the vaginal wall as sling material.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stamey, TA, Schaeffer AJ, Condy M (1975) Clinical and roentgenographic evaluation of endoscopic suspension of the vesical neck for urinary incontinence (1975) Surg Gynecol Obstet 140:355–360

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Raz S (1981) Modified bladder neck suspension for female stress incontinence. Urology 17:82–85

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Trockman BA, Leach GE, Hamilton J, Sokamoto M, Santiago L, Zimmern PE (1995) Modified Pereyra bladder neck suspension: 10-year mean follow-up using outcome analysis in 125 patients. J Urol 159:1841–1847

    Google Scholar 

  4. Aldridge AH (1942) Transplantation of fascia for relief of urinary stress incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 44:398–402

    Google Scholar 

  5. Flynn BJ, Yap WT (2002) Pubovaginal sling using allograft fascia lata versus autograft fascia for all types of stress urinary incontinence: 2-year minimum follow-up. J Urol 167:608–612

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Leach GE, Dmochowski RR, Appell RA, Blaivas JT, Hadley HR, Luber KM, Mostwin JL, O’Donnell PD, Roehrborn CG (1997) Female Stress Urinary Incontinence Clinical Guidelines panel summary report on surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 158:875–880

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Falconer C, Ekman-Ordeberg G, Malmstrom A, Ulmsten U (1996) Clinical outcome and changes in connective tissue metabolism after intravaginal slingplasty in stress incontinent women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunc 7:133–137

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Handa VL, Jensen JK, Germain MM, Ostergard DR (1996) Banked human fascia lata for the suburethral sling procedure: a preliminary report. Obstet Gynecol, 88:1045–1049

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fitzgerald MP, Mollenhauer J, Brubaker L (1999) Failure of allograft suburethral slings. BJU Int 84:785–788

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Carbone JM, Kavaler E, Hu JC, Raz S (2001) Pubovaginal sling using cadaveric fascia and bone anchors: disappointing early results. J Urol 165:1605–1611

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Buck BE, Resnick L, Shah SM et al. (1990) Human immunodeficiency virus cultured from bone. Implications for transplantation. Clin Orthop 251:249–253

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Amundsen CL, Guralnick ML, Webster GD (2000) Variations in strategy for the treatment of urethral obstruction after a pubovaginal sling procedure. J Urol 164:434–437

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Norris JP, Breslin DS, Staskin DR (1996) Use of synthetic material in sling surgery: a minimally invasive approach J Endourol 10:227–230

    Google Scholar 

  14. Clemens JQ, DeLancey JO, Faerber GJ, Malinin TI (2000) Urinary tract erosions after synthetic pubovaginal slings: diagnosis and management strategy. Urology 56:589–594

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Su TH, Huang JP, Wang YL, Yang JM, Wei HJ, Huang CL (1999) Is modified in situ vaginal wall sling operation the treatment of choice for recurrent genuine stress incontinence? J Urol 162:2073–2077

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Escandon AS (2001) ‘Sandwich technique’ for suburethral placement of mersilene mesh sling during pubovaginal suspension surgery: preliminary results. Urology 57:49–57

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Niknejad K, Plzak LSIII, Staskin DR, Loughlin KR (2002) Autologous and synthetic urethral slings for female incontinence. Urol Clin North Am 29:597–611

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Levent Emir.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Emir, L., Erol, D., Ak, H. et al. A new technique combining both polypropylene and vaginal wall sling procedures: can it minimize the risk of urethral and vaginal erosion occurring with synthetic materials?. World J Urol 23, 221–224 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-005-0503-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-005-0503-7

Keywords

Navigation