New tined lead electrode in sacral neuromodulation: experience from a multicentre European study

Abstract

The use of a new tined lead electrode for sacral neuromodulation (SNS) was evaluated in a European study including 127 patients with chronic voiding dysfunction. The tined lead can be implanted during the first stage of the SNS procedure, which makes a longer test period possible before implanting the pulse generator in a second stage. Implantation of the tined lead was performed under local anaesthesia in 89% of patients. Screening lasted on average 30 days. Screening with the tined lead was considered successful by the physicians in 77% of patients (n=72). In 74% of first stage patients (n=70), at least 50% improvement in the main symptoms versus baseline was obtained. This was sustained for up to 6 weeks. All of these patients received the pulse generator in a second stage. The outcome of this study supports the use of the tined lead electrode as a screening tool in SNS therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. 1.

    Abrams P, Blaivas JG, Fowler CJ et al. (2003) The role of neuromodulation in the management of urinary urge incontinence. BJU Int 91:355–359

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Bosch R, Groen J (2000) Sacral nerve neuromodulation in the treatment of patients with refractory motor urge incontinence: long-term results of a prospective longitudinal study. J Urol 163:1219–1222

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Chai TC, Mamo GJ (2001) Modified techniques of S3 foramen localization and lead implantation in S3 neuromodulation. Urology 58:786–790

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Everaert K, Kerckhaert W, Caluwaerts H et al. (2004) A prospective randomized trial comparing the 1-stage with the 2-stage implantation of a pulse generator in patients with pelvic floor dysfunction selected for sacral nerve stimulation. Eur Urol 45:649–654

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Everaert K, Plancke H, Lefevere F et al. (1997) The urodynamic evaluation of neuromodulation in patients with voiding dysfunction. Br J Urol 79:702–707

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Janknegt RA, Weil EHJ, Eerdmans PH (1997) Improving neuromodulation technique for refractory voiding dysfunction: two-stage implant. Urology 78:39–46

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Jonas U, Fowler CJ, Chancellor MB et al. (2001) Efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation for urinary retention: results 18 months after implantation. J Urol 165:15–19

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Kinchen KS, Burgio K, Diokno AC et al. (2003) Factors associated with women’s decisions to seek treatment for urinary incontinence. J Women’s Health 12:687–698

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Miner PB (2004) Economic and personal impact of fecal and urinary incontinence. Gastroenterology 126 [Suppl 1]:S8-S13

  10. 10.

    Scheepens WA, Weil EH, Van Koeveringe GA et al. (2001) Buttock placement of the implantable pulse generator: a new implantation technique for sacral neuromodulation—a multicentre study. Eur Urol 40:434–438

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Schmidt RA, Senn E, Tanagho EA (1990) Functional evaluation of sacral nerve root integrity. Report of a technique. Urology 35:388–392

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Shaker HS, Hassouna M (1998) Sacral root neuromodulation in idiopathic nonobstructive chronic urinary retention. J Urol 159:1476–1478

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Siegel SW (2002) Sacral nerve stimulation: PNE. In: Jonas U, Grünewald V (eds) New perspectives in sacral nerve stimulation. Martin Dunitz, London, pp 99–106

  14. 14.

    Spinelli M, Giardiello G, Gerber M et al. (2003) New sacral neuromodulation lead for percutaneous implantation using local anesthesia: description and first experience. J Urol 170:1905–1907

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Tanagho EA, Schmidt RA (1988) Electrical stimulation in the clinical management of the neurogenic bladder. J Urol 140:1331–1339

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Tanago EA, Schmidt RA (1991) In: Krane RJ, Siroky MB (eds) Clinical neurology, 2nd edn. Little Brown, Boston, pp 643–648

  17. 17.

    Van Kerrebroeck P, Van Voskuilen A, Lycklama A Nyeholt AA, Dijkema H, Bemelmans B, Fall M, Fowler C, Das A, Milam D, Siegel S, Van den Hombergh U, PAS Study Group (2004) Long-term results of Interstim therapy for voiding disorders demonstrate sustained efficacy and acceptable safety profile. Eur Urol [Suppl] 3:170

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Van Voskuilen A, Van Kerrebroeck P, Dijkema H, Bemelmans B, Lycklama A Nijholt A, Fall M, Jonas U, Fowler CJ, Das AK, Milam D, Siegel SW, Van den Hombergh U (2004) Lasting improvement is demonstrated in patients with voiding disorders treated with sacral nerve stimulation. J Urol 171 [Suppl 4]: 328

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michele Spinelli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spinelli, M., Weil, E., Ostardo, E. et al. New tined lead electrode in sacral neuromodulation: experience from a multicentre European study. World J Urol 23, 225–229 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-005-0502-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Lower urinary tract dysfunctions
  • Sacral neuromodulation
  • Minimally invasive
  • Overactive bladder
  • Urinary retention
  • Tined lead