Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Categorisation of complications of endoscopic extraperitoneal and laparoscopic transperitoneal radical prostatectomy

  • Review
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the present review is to focus on the various attempts of categorisation of complications after endoscopic extraperitoneal and laparoscopic transperitoneal radical prostatectomy. Several classifications of complications and adverse events have been proposed in the literature but none is widely accepted or applied so far. We thus present a review of the existing literature and the complications of our series of 900 patients treated with endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE). We applied the recently revised Clavien classification system to grade EERPE complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bollens R, Vanden Bossche M, Roumeguere T, Damoun A, Ekane S, Hoffmann P, Zlotta AR, Schulman CC (2001) Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Results after 50 cases. Eur Urol 40:65–69

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cathelineau X, Cahill D, Widmer H, Rozet F, Baumert H, Vallancien G (2004) Transperitoneal or extraperitoneal approach for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a false debate over a real challenge. J Urol 171:714–716

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rassweiler J, Sentker L, Seemann O, Hatzinger M, Stock C, Frede T (2001) Heilbronn laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Technique and results after 100 cases. Eur Urol 40:54–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rassweiler J, Seeman O, Schulze M, Teber D, Hatzinger M, Frede T (2003) Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. J Urol 169:1689–1693

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Guillonneau B, el-Fettouh H, Baumert H, Cathelineau X, Doublet JD, Fromont G, Vallancien G (2003) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy oncological evaluation after 1,000 cases at Montsouris Institute. J Urol 169:1261–1266

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Stolzenburg J-U, Rabenalt R, Do M, Ho K, Dorschner W, Waldkirch E, Jonas U, Schütz A, Horn L, Truss MC (2005) Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE)—oncological and functional results after 700 procedures. J Urol 174:1271–1275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rozet F, Galiano M, Cathelineau X, Barret E, Cathala N, Vallancien G (2005) Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a prospective evaluation of 600 cases. J Urol 174:908–911

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stolzenburg JU, Do M, Rabenalt R, Pfeiffer H, Horn L, Truss MC, Jonas U, Dorschner W (2003) Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE)—initial experience after 70 procedures. J Urol 169:2066–2071

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stolzenburg JU, Do M, Pfeiffer H, König F, Aedtner B, Dorschner W (2002) The endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE): technique and initial experience. World J Urol 20:48–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Stolzenburg JU, Truss MC (2003) Technique of laparoscopic (endoscopic) radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 91:749–757

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Stolzenburg JU, Truss MC, Do M, Rabenalt R, Pfeiffer H, Dunzinger M, Aedtner B, Stief CG, Jonas U, Dorschner W (2003) Evolution of endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE)—technical improvements and development of a nerve-sparing, potency-preserving approach. World J Urol 21:147–152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stolzenburg JU, Truss MC, Bekos A, Do M., Rabenalt R, Stief CG, Hoznek A, Abbou CC, Neuhaus J, Dorschner W (2004) Does the extraperitoneal laparoscopic approach improve the outcome of radical prostatectomy? Curr Urol Rep 5:115–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Guillonneau B, Rozet F, Cathelineau X, Lay F, Barret E, Doublet JD, Baumert H, Vallancien G (2002) Perioperative complications of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris 3-year experience. J Urol 167:51–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM (1992) Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery 111:518–526

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gonzalgo ML, Pavlovich CP, Trock BJ, Link RE, Sullivan W, Su LM (2005) Classification and trends of perioperative morbidities following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 174:135–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Veen EJ, Janssen-Heijnen ML, Leenen LP, Roukema JA (2005) The registration of complications in surgery: a learning curve. World J Surg 29:402–409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bhandari A, McIntire L, Kaul SA, Hemal AK, Peabody JO, Menon M (2005) Perioperative complications of robotic radical prostatectomy after the learning curve. J Urol 174:915–918

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Arai Y, Egawa S, Terachi T, Suzuki K, Gotoh M, Kawakita M, Tanaka M, Terada N, Baba S, Okumura K, Hayami S, Ono Y, Matsuda T, Naito S (2003) Morbidity of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: summary of early multi-institutional experience in Japan. Int J Urol 10:430–434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Martina GR, Giumelli P, Scuzzarella S, Remotti M, Caruso G, Lovisolo J (2005) Laparoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy-learning curve of a laparoscopy-naive urologist in a community hospital. Urology 65:959–963

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hoznek A, Antiphon P, Borkowski T, Gettman M, Katz R, Salomon L, Zaki S, de la Taille A, Abbou CC (2003) Assessment of surgical technique and perioperative morbidity associated with extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology 61:617–622

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dillioglugil Ö, Leibman BD, Leibman NS, Kattan MW, Rosas AL, Scardino PT (1997) Risk factors for complications and morbidity after radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 157:1760–1767

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Guillonneau B, Gupta R, El Fettouh H, Cathelineau X, Baumert H, Vallancien G (2003) Laparoscopic management of rectal injury during radical prostatectomy. J Urol 169:1694–1696

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bishoff JT, Allaf ME, Kirkels W, Moore RG, Kavoussi LR, Schroder F (1999) Laparoscopic bowel injury: incidence and clinical presentation. J Urol 161:887–890

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Vallancien G, Cathelineau X, Baumert H, Doublet JD, Guillonneau B (2002) Complications of transperitoneal laparoscopic surgery in urology: review of 1,311 procedures at a single center. J Urol 168:23–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. van Velthoven RF (2005) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal approach: is there an advantage for the patient? Curr Opin Urol 15:83–88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stolzenburg, JU., Rabenalt, R., Do, M. et al. Categorisation of complications of endoscopic extraperitoneal and laparoscopic transperitoneal radical prostatectomy. World J Urol 24, 88–93 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-005-0036-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-005-0036-0

Keywords

Navigation