Skip to main content
Log in

Imaging for kidney stones

  • Topic Paper
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Imaging investigations play a vital role in the management of patients with kidney stones. The techniques available include plain x-ray of the abdomen, ultrasound scan, intravenous urogram, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging, amongst others. All of these techniques have their own individual roles to play and also have limitations. CT has been establishing itself as the imaging technique of choice and some exciting developments are on the way. However, renal stone disease is a complex condition. Furthermore, there are a variety of surgical techniques used to treat stones. It is therefore important that the strengths and weakness of each of the modalities are clearly understood and the investigations are tailored to address the problem in hand.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1 a, b
Fig. 2
Fig. 3 a, b
Fig. 4 a, b
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Canales B, Monga M (2003) Surgical management of calyceal diverticulum. Curr Opin Urol 13:255–260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Elbahnasy AM, Shalhav AL, Hoenig DM, Elashr OM, Smith DS, McDougall EM, Clayman R (1998) Lower calyceal stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy: the impact of lower pole radiographic anatomy. J Urol 159:676–682

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hemal AK, Goel A, Goel R (2003) Minimally invasive retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy. J Urol 169:480–482

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jewett MA, Bombardier C, Caron D, Ryan MR, Gray RR, St. Louis EL, Witchell SJ, Kumra S, Psihramis KE (1992) Potential for inter-observer and intra-observer variability in x-ray review to establish stone-free rates after lithotripsy. J Urol 147:559–562

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Randall A (1937) The origin and growth of renal calculi. Ann Surg 105:1009–1027

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Regan F, Petronis J, Bohlman M, Rodriguez R, Moore R (1997) Perirenal MRI high signal: a new and sensitive indicator of acute ureteric obstruction. Clin Radiol 52:445–450

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stephen Amis E, Epitaph for the urogram, Radiology (1999) 213, 639–640

  8. Sudah M, Vanninen RL, Partanen K, Kainulainen S, Malinen A, Heino A, Ala-opas M (2002) Patients with acute flank pain: comparison of MRI urography with unenhanced CT. Radiology 223:98–105

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sudah M, Vanninen R, Partanen K, Heino A, Vainio P, Ala-opas M (2001) MRI urography in evaluation of acute flank pain: T2-weighted sequences and gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional FLASH compared with urography. AJR 176:105–112

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Takebayashi S, Hosaka M, Kubota Y, Noguchi K, Fukuda M, Ishibas, Tomoda T, Matsubara S (2000) Computerised tomographic ureteroscopy for diagnosis of ureteral tumours. J Urol 163:42–46

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. N. Rao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rao, P.N. Imaging for kidney stones. World J Urol 22, 323–327 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-004-0413-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-004-0413-0

Keywords

Navigation