Benefits of Biochar for Improving Ion Contents, Cell Membrane Permeability, Leaf Water Status and Yield of Rice Under Saline–Sodic Paddy Field Condition
- 43 Downloads
Saline–sodic is one of the major conditions threatening crop production. Biochar application could alleviate the adverse impacts of saline–sodic stress in crops. But its effect on reducing Na+ uptake in rice under saline–sodic paddy field condition remains unknown. This study evaluated the effect of biochar on ion contents, cell membrane permeability, leaf water status and yield of rice in saline–sodic paddy soil using a field experiment. The soil was amended with biochar at zero-biochar (B0), 33.75 t ha−1 (B1), 67.5 t ha−1 (B2), and 101.25 t ha−1 (B3), respectively. The results indicated that biochar addition significantly reduced Na+ concentration and Na+/K+ ratio, while it remarkably increased K+ concentration of rice plant. Furthermore, biochar application significantly decreased the leaf-relative electrical leakage and increased leaf water status, plant height, and chlorophyll content index. The rice biomass production and harvested yield were significantly increased. Therefore, biochar application to saline–sodic paddy soil has benefits to alleviate saline–sodic stress and increase rice yield in saline–sodic paddy soil.
KeywordsBiochar saline–sodic stress Ion accumulation Osmotic stress
The study was founded by National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFD0300104, 2017YFD0300609), Jilin Province Science and Technology Development Programs (20160204011NY).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
- Abrishamkesh S, Gorji M, Asadi H, Bagheri-Marandi GH, Pourbabaee AA (2015) Effects of rice husk biochar application on the properties of alkaline soil and lentil growth. Plant Soil Environ 11:475–482Google Scholar
- Chen JH, Liu XY, Li LQ, Zheng JW, Qu JJ, Zheng JF, Zhang XH, Pan GX (2015) Consistent increase in abundance and diversity but variable change in community composition of bacteria in topsoil of rice paddy under short term biochar treatment across three sites from South China. Appl Soil Ecol 91:68–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ghafoor A, Gill MA, Hassan A, Murtaza G, Qadir M (2001) Gypsum: an economical amendment for amelioration of saline-sodic waters and soils and for improving crop yields. Int J Agric Biol 9:266–275Google Scholar
- Liu XH, Zhang XC (2012) Effect of biochar on pH of alkaline soils in the Loess Plateau: results from incubation experiments. Int J Agric Biol 4:745–750Google Scholar
- Lu RK (2000) Methods of soil and agro-chemical analysis. China Agric Sci Tech Press, Beijing (In Chinese) Google Scholar
- Mae T, Ohira K (1981) The remobilization of nitrogen related to leaf growth and senescence in rice plants (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Cell Physiol 22:1067–1074Google Scholar
- Oster JD, Shainberg I, Abrol IP (1999) Reclamation of salt affected soils. In: Skaggs RW, van Schilfgaarde J (eds) Agricultural drainage. ASA–CSSA–SSSA, Madison, pp 659–691Google Scholar
- Reddy MP, Vora AB (1986) Changes in pigment composition, hill reaction activityand saccharides metabolism in bajra (Pennisetum typhoides S&H) leaves under NaCl salinity. Photosynthetica 20:50–55Google Scholar
- Shafaqat A, Muhammad R, Muhammad FQ, Yong SO, Muhammad I, Muhammad R, Muhammad SA, Farhan H, Mohammad IAW, Ahmad NS (2017) Biochar soil amendment on alleviation of drought and salt stress in plants: a critical review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 14:12700–12712Google Scholar
- Vitkova J, Kondrlova E, Rodny M, Surda P, Horak J (2017) Analysis of soil water content and crop yield after biochar application in field conditions. Plant Soil Environ 12:569–573Google Scholar
- Yang F, Li XQ, Xing Y, Cheng HG, Zhang LK, He YY, Wang B (2014) Effect of biochar amendment on nitrogen leaching in saline soil. J Agro-Environ Sci 33:972–977Google Scholar
- Zemanová V, Břendová K, Pavlíková D, Kubátová P, Tlustoš P (2017) Effect of biochar application on the content of nutrients (Ca, Fe, K, Mg, Na, P) and amino acids in subsequently growing spinach and mustard. Plant Soil Environ 7:322–327Google Scholar