Advertisement

Efficient Parthenogenesis Induction and In Vitro Haploid Plant Regeneration in Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) Using Putrescine, Spermidine, and Cycocel

  • Hamed Ebrahimzadeh
  • Mehran E. Shariatpanahi
  • Behzad Ahmadi
  • Hassan Soltanloo
  • Mahmoud Lotfi
  • Eissa Zarifi
Article

Abstract

In this study, the effect of spraying mother plants with various levels of putrescine, spermidine, and cycocel (each at 0, 50, 500, and 5000 mg/l) were assessed on the frequency of haploid embryos produced from unfertilized ovaries and subsequent regeneration of derived embryos. Significantly higher haploid embryos were obtained when mother plants were sprayed with putrescine at 500 mg/l (5.2 embryos/fruit), spermidine at 50 mg/l (4.8 embryos/fruit), and cycocel at 50 mg/l (5.2 embryos/fruit) as compared to the control (without spraying, 3.2 embryos/fruit). However, embryogenesis induction was decreased drastically as the concentration of all the three compounds tested was increased and the lowest haploid embryos were observed when 5000 mg/l of spermidine (0.4 embryos/fruit) or cycocel (2.0 embryos/fruit) were applied. Only spermidine at 50 mg/l led to 100% regeneration into fully developed plantlets. The seed setting and size of fruits were also affected by polyamines and cycocel applications. Ploidy analysis using a flow cytometer indicated that all regenerated plantlets contain the gametic chromosome number (n = x = 7) of parental plants and the results of chromosome counting also confirmed the haploid nature of regenerated plantlets. It can be concluded that the induction of haploid embryogenesis from unfertilized ovaries after pollination with irradiated pollen and subsequent conversion of derived embryos into the plantlets could be improved in Cucumis sativus L. by applying appropriate levels of putrescine, spermidine, and cycocel.

Keywords

Cucumis sativus L. Embryo rescue Haploid Parthenogenesis Polyamines 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by grants from Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran (ABRII) Project No. 12-05-05-9451-94001.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

References

  1. Abd El-Migeed MMM, Mostafa EAM, Ashour NE, Hassan HSA, Mohamed DM, Saleh MMS (2013) Effect of potassium and polyamine sprays on fruit set, fruit retention, yield and fruit quality of Amhat date palm. Int J Agric Res 8(2):77–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahamdi B, Shariatpanahi ME, Ojaghkandi MA, Heydari AA (2014) Improved microspore embryogenesis induction and plantlet regeneration using putrescine, cefotaxime and vancomycin in Brassica napus L. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 118:497–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alifar M, Ebadi A, FatahiMoghadam MR (2015) Effects of putrescine and chlormequat pre-flowering treatment on embryo rescue technique success in diallele crosses of grape cultivars Flame Seedless, perlette and Yaghooti. Iran J Hortic Sci 46(2):179–192Google Scholar
  4. Altinas S (2011) Effects of chlormequat chloride and different rates of prohexadione-calcium on seedling growth, flowering, fruit development and yield of tomato. Afr J Biotechnol 10(75):17160–17169Google Scholar
  5. Aydin M, Hossein Pour A, Haliloglu K, Tosun M (2016) Effect of polyamines on somatic embryogenesis via mature embryo in wheat. Turk J Biol 40:1178–1184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baron K, Stasolla C (2008) The role of polyamines during in vivo and in vitro development. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 44:384–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bibi A, Oosterhuis D, Gonias E (2012) Changes in the ovarian polyamine content and seed set efficiency of cotton by the plant growth regulator BM86″. Am J Plant Sci 3(9):1328–1335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen J-T, Chang W-C (2003) Effects of GA3, ancymidol, cycocel and paclobutrazol on direct somatic embryogenesis of Oncidium in vitro. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 75:105–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen JF, Sraub JE, Jiang J (1998) A reevaluation of karyotype in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Genet Res Crop Evol 45(4):301–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dong YQ, Zhao WX, Li XH, Liu XC, Gao NN, Huang JH, Wang WY, Xu XL, Tang ZH (2016) Androgenesis, gynogenesis, and parthenogenesis haploids in cucurbit species. Plant Cell Rep 35(10):1991–2019CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ebrahimi R, Zamani Z (2009) Effect of polyamines on in vitro gynogenesis of onion (Allium cepa L.). Am Eur J Sustain Agric 3(1):71–74Google Scholar
  12. El Meskaoul A, Trembaly FM (2009) Effects of exogenous polyamines and inhibitors of polyamine biosynthesis on endogenous free polyamine contents and the maturation of white spruce somatic embryos. Afr J Biotechnol 8(24):6807–6816Google Scholar
  13. Gałązka J, Niemirowicz-Szczytt K (2013) Review of research on haploid production in cucumber and other cucurbits. Folia Hortic 25(1):67–78Google Scholar
  14. Gémes Juhász A, Balogh P, Ferenczy A, Kristóf Z (2002) Effect of optimal stage of female gametophyte and heat treatment on in vitro gynogenesis induction in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Plant Cell Rep 21:105–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gorecka K, Kiszczak W, Krzyzanowska D, Kowalska U, Kapuscinska A (2014) Effect of polyamines on in vitro anther cultures of carrot (Daucus carota L.). Turk J Biol 38:593–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haque S, Farooqi AHA, Gupta MM, Sangwan RS, Khan A (2007) Effect of ethrel, chlormequat chloride and paclobutrazol on growth and pyrethrins accumulation in Chrysanthemum cinerariaefolium Vis. Plant Growth Regul 51:263–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Imai A, Matsuyama T, Hanzawa Y, Akiyama T, Tamaoki M, Saji H, Shirano Y, Kato T, Hayashi H, Shibata D, Tabata S, Komeda Y, Takahashi T (2004) Spermidine synthase genes are essential for survival of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 135:1565–1573CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Kamiab F, Salehabad MH, Zamani bahramabadi E (2015) Evaluation the effects of foliar treatments of polyamines and some organic acids on quantitative and qualitative traits in some pistachio cultivars. J Nuts 6(2):131–142Google Scholar
  19. Kong L, Attree SM, Fowke LC (1998) Effects of polyethylene glycol and methylglyoxalbis (guanylhydrazone) on endogenous polyamine levels and somatic embryo maturation in white spruce (Picea glauca). Plant Sci 133:211–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kumar HGA, Ravishankar BV, Murthy HN (2004) The influence of polyamines on androgenesis of Cucumis sativus L. Eur J Hortic Sci 69(5):201–205Google Scholar
  21. Lewitsky GA (1931) An essay on cytological analysis of the fixing action of the chrom-acetic formalin and the chromic formalin. Bull Appl Bot 27(1):181–185Google Scholar
  22. Lotfi M, Alan AR, Henning MJ, Jahn MM, Earle ED (2003) Production of haploid and doubled haploid plants of melon (Cucumis melo L.) for use in breeding for multiple virus resistance. Plant Cell Rep 21:1121–1128CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Malá J, Cvikrová M, Máchová P, Martincová O (2009) Polyamines during somatic embryo development in Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.]). J For Sci 55(2):75–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Malik AU, Singh Z (2006) Improved fruit retention, yield and fruit quality in mango with exogenous application of polyamines. Sci Hortic 110:167–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Martínez LE, Agüero CB, López ME, Galmarini CR (2000) Improvement of in vitro gynogenesis induction in onion (Allium cepa L.) using polyamines. Plant Sci 156(2):221–226CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Miroshnichenko D, Filippov M, Doglov S (2009) Effects of daminozide on somatic embryogenesis from immature and mature embryos of wheat. Aust J Crop Sci 3(2):83–94Google Scholar
  27. Mukherjee A, Bandyopadhyay A (2014) Inducing somatic embryogenesis by polyamines in medicinally important Clerodendrum indicum L. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 3(8):12–26Google Scholar
  28. Mulualem T, Abate M (2016) Heterotic Response in Major Cereals and Vegetable Crops. Int J Plant Breed Genet 10(2):69–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Musial K, Usial K, Bohanec B, Przywara L (2001) Embryological study on gynogenesis in onion (Allium cepa L.). Plant Reprod 13:335–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Passam HC, Koutri AC, Karapanos IC (2008) The effect of chlormequat chloride (CCC) application at the bolting stage on the flowering and seed production of lettuce plants previously treated with water or gibberellic acid (GA3). Sci Hortic 116(2):117–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Paul A, Mitter K, Raychaudhuri SS (2009) Effect of polyamines on in vitro somatic embryogenesis in Momordica charantia L. Plant Cell Tissue Org Cult 97(3):303–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ponce MT, Guinazo M, Tizio R (2002) Effect of putrescine on embryo development in the stenospermocarpic grape cvs Emperatriz and Fantasy. Vitis 41(1):53–54Google Scholar
  33. Ponce M, Martinez L, Galmarini C (2006) Influence of CCC, putrescine and gellam gum concentration on gynogenic embryo induction in Allium cepa. Biol Plant 50(3):425–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Przyborowski JA, Niemirowicz-Szczytt K (1994) Main factors affecting cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) haploid embryo development and haploid plant characteristics. Plant Breed 112:70–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pullman GS, Mein J, Johnson S, Zhang Y (2005) Gibberellin inhibitors improve embryogenic tissue initiation in conifers. Plant Cell Rep 23:596–605CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Rademacher W (2000) Growth retardants: effects on gibberellin biosynthesis and other metabolic pathways. Ann Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 51:501–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Redha A, Suleman P (2009) Assessment of polyamines and trehalose in wheat microspores culture for embryogenesis and green regenerated plants. Am J Plant Sci 4:2218–2226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Saleem BA, Malik AU, Anwar R, Farooq M (2006) Exogenous application of polyamines improves fruit set, yield and quality of sweet oranges. Acta Hortic 774:187–194Google Scholar
  39. Sargent HR, Godwin ID, Adkins SW (1998) The effect of exogenous polyamines on somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from Sorghum bicolor and Saccharum spp. Acta Hortic 461:451–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sauton A, Dumas de Vaulx R (1987) Production of haploid plants in melon (Cucumis melo L.) as a result of gynogenesis induced by irradiated pollen. Agronomie 7(2):141–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shakhanokho HF, Ozias-Akins P, May L, Chee PW (2005) Putrescine enhances somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration in upland cotton. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 81:91–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shariatpanahi ME, Ahmadi B (2016) Isolated microspore culture and its applications in plant breeding and genetics. In: Anis M, Ahmad N (eds), Plant tissue culture: propagation, conservation and crop improvement. Springer Science + Business Media Singapore, pp 487–507Google Scholar
  43. Silveira V, Floh EIS, Handro W, Guerra MP (2004) Effect of plant growth regulators on the cellular growth and levels of intracellular proteins, starch and polyamines in embryogenic suspension cultures of Pinustaeda. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 76:53–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Takahashi T, Kakehi J-I (2010) Polyamines: ubiquitous polycations with unique roles in growth and stress responses. Ann Bot 105:1–6CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Thiruvengadam M, Rekha KT, Jayabalan N, Praveen N, Kin EH, Chung IM (2013) Effect of exogenous polyamines enhances somatic embryogenesis via suspension cultures of spine gourd (Momordica dioica Roxb. ex. Willd.). Aust J Crop Sci 7(3):446–453Google Scholar
  46. Tiburcio A, Altabella T, Bitrián M, Alcázar R (2014) The roles of polyamines during the lifespan of plants: from development to stress. Planta 240(1):1–18CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Urano K, Yoshiba Y, Nanjo T, Igarashi Y, Seki M, Sekiguchi F, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K (2003) Characterization of Arabidopsis genes involved in biosynthesis of polyamines in abiotic stress responses and developmental stages. Plant Cell Environ 26(11):1917–1926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wei A, Du S, Han Y, Zhang G (2010) A study on the relationship between cucumber gynogenesis and content of ovary hormones and polyamines. Acta Hortic 871:625–630Google Scholar
  49. Zarifi E, Güloğlu D (2016) An improved Aceto-Iron-Haematoxylin staining for mitotic chromosomes in Cornelian cherry (Cornus mas L.). Caryologia 69(1):67–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zhang T, Wang X, Wang Y, Han J, Mao P, Majerus M (2009) Plant growth regulator effects on balancing vegetative and reproductive phases in alfalfa seed yield. Agron J 101:1139–1145CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hamed Ebrahimzadeh
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mehran E. Shariatpanahi
    • 2
  • Behzad Ahmadi
    • 3
  • Hassan Soltanloo
    • 1
  • Mahmoud Lotfi
    • 4
  • Eissa Zarifi
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Plant Breeding and BiotechnologyGorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural ResourcesGorganIran
  2. 2.Department of Tissue and Cell Culture, Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran (ABRII)Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO)KarajIran
  3. 3.Department of Maize and Forage Crops, Seed and Plant Improvement Institute (SPII)Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO)KarajIran
  4. 4.Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Genetics and Breeding of VegetablesUniversity of TehranPakdasht, TehranIran
  5. 5.Genetics and Genetic Resources Research Department, Seed and Plant Improvement InstituteAgricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO)KarajIran

Personalised recommendations