Increase in Salt Tolerance of Arabidopsis thaliana by TaDi19
- 303 Downloads
The gene expression profile chip of salt-resistant wheat mutant RH8706-49 under salt stress was investigated. The overall length of the cDNA sequence of the probe was obtained using electronic cloning and RT-PCR. An unknown gene induced by salt was obtained, cloned, and named TaDi19 (Triticum aestivum drought-induced protein). No related report or research on the protein is available. qPCR analysis showed that gene expression was induced by many stresses, such as salt. Arabidopsis thaliana was genetically transferred using the overexpressing gene, which increased its salt tolerance. After salt stress, the transgenic plant demonstrated better physiological indicators (higher Ca2+ and lower Na+) than those of the wild-type plant. Results of non-invasive micro-test technology indicate that TaDi19-overexpressing A. thaliana significantly effluxed Na+ after salt treatment, whereas the wild-type plant influxed Na+. Chelating extracellular Ca2+ resulted in insignificant differences in salt tolerance between overexpressing and wild-type A. thaliana. Subcellular localization showed that the gene encoding protein was mainly located in the cell membrane and nucleus. TaDi19 was overexpressed in wild-type A. thaliana, and the transgenic lines were more salt-tolerant than the control A. thaliana. Thus, the wheat gene TaDi19 could increase the salt tolerance of A. thaliana.
KeywordsArabidopsis thaliana Non-invasive micro-test technology Salt stress Subcellular location Wheat
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Fund (30971766) and the Hebei Provincial Natural Science Fund (No. C2009000278).
- Mendoza I, Rubio F, Rodriguez-Navarro A, Prado JM (1994) The protein phosphatase calcineurin is essential for NaCl tolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biol Chem 269:8792–8796Google Scholar
- Sun J et al (2009) NaCl-induced alternations of cellular and tissue ion fluxes in roots of salt-resistant and salt-sensitive poplar species. Plant Physiol 149:141–1153Google Scholar