Journal of Plant Growth Regulation

, Volume 34, Issue 1, pp 35–46 | Cite as

Effective Microorganisms Improve Growth Performance and Modulate the ROS-Scavenging System in Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Plants Exposed to Salinity Stress

  • Neveen B. Talaat


No information is available concerning effective microorganisms’ (EM) influence on the ROS-scavenging system under saline conditions. Thus, as a first approach, the present study evaluates the effect of EM on antioxidant machinery, and also visualizes the interrelationship between EM and salinity stress response components. Phaseolus vulgaris cv. Nebraska plants were grown under non-saline or saline conditions (2.5 and 5.0 dS m−1) with and without EM application. Plants exposed to soil salinity exhibited a significant decline in growth, productivity and membrane stability index. However, the follow-up treatment with EM detoxified the stress generated by salinity and significantly improved the above parameters. The concentrations of proline and glycinebetaine, the activities of antioxidative enzymes (superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, catalase and glutathione reductase), and the contents of antioxidant molecules (glutathione, ascorbate, phenols and anthocyanins) were increased under saline conditions; these increases were more significant in salt-stressed plants treated with EM. Soil salinization induced oxidative damage through increased lipid peroxidation, electrolyte leakage and hydrogen peroxide levels. EM application altered plant physiology and significantly reduced the oxidative damage. Both the prevention of oxidative stress and the elimination of ROS can be one of the most effective mechanisms used by EM-treated plants to gain tolerance against salinity stress. Indeed, with this biological strategy plants find protection from the deleterious effects of oxidants and cope with salty soils.


Effective microorganisms Plant growth Phaseolus vulgaris Productivity ROS-scavenging system Salinity stress 


  1. Abdel-Aal ESM, Huel PA (1999) Rapid method for quantifying total anthocyanins in blue aleurone and purple pericarp wheat. Cereal Chem 76:350–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alscher PG, Erturk N, Heath LS (2002) Role of superoxide dismutases (SODs) in controlling oxidative stress in plant. J Exp Bot 53:1331–1341CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson ME (1985) Determination of glutathione and glutathione disulfides in biological samples. Methods Enzymol 113:548–570CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Apel K, Hirt H (2004) Reactive oxygen species: metabolism, oxidative stress and signal transduction. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 55:373–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ashraf M, Foolad MR (2007) Roles of glycine betaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress resistance. Environ Exp Bot 59:206–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bates LS, Aldren RP, Teare LD (1973) Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies. Plant Soil 39:205–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bayuelo-Jiménes JS, Craig R, Lynch JP (2002) Salinity tolerance of phaseolus species during germination and early seedling growth. Crop Sci 42:1584–1594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beauchamp CO, Fridovich I (1971) Superoxide dismutase: improved assays and assay applicable to acrylamide gels. Ann Biochem 44:276–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chalker-Scott L (2002) Do anthocyanins function as osmoregulators in leaf tissues? Adv Bot Res 37:103–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chance B, Maehly AC (1955) Assay of catalase and peroxidases. Methods Enzymol 2:764–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cottenie A, Verloo M, Kiekens L, Velghe G, Camerlynck R (1982) Chemical analysis of plants and soils. Laboratory of Analytical and Agrochemistry, State University, Ghent, pp 14–24Google Scholar
  12. D’Souza MR, Devaraj VR (2010) Biochemical responses of Hyacinth bean (Lablab purpureus) to salinity stress. Acta Physiol Plant 32:341–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grieve CM, Grattan SR (1983) Rapid assay for determination of water soluble quaternary ammonium compounds. Plant Soil 70:303–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Higa T (2000) What is EM technology? EM World J 1:1–6Google Scholar
  15. Higa T (2004) Effective microorganisms—a new dimension for nature farming. In: Parr JF, Hornick SB, Simpson ME (eds) Proceedings of the 2nd international nature farming conference. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, pp 20–22Google Scholar
  16. Hodges MD, DeLong JM, Forney CF, Prange RK (1999) Improving the thiobarbituric acid-reactive-substances assay for lipid peroxidation in plant tissues containing anthocyanin and other interfering compounds. Planta 207:604–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hu C, Qi Y (2013) Long-term effective microorganisms application promote growth and increase yields and nutrition of wheat in China. Eur J Agron 46:63–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ismail SM (2013) Influence of effective microorganisms and green manure on soil properties and productivity of pearl millet and alfalfa grown on sandy loam in Saudi Arabia. Afr J Microbiol Res 7:375–382Google Scholar
  19. Jana S, Choudhari MA (1981) Glycolate metabolism of three submerged aquatic angiosperms during ageing. Aquat Bot 12:345–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kovácik J, Backor M (2007) Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase and phenolic compounds in chamomile tolerance to cadmium and copper excess. Water Air Soil Poll 185:185–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Läuchli A (1984) Salt exclusion: an adaptation of legumes for crops and pastures under saline conditions. In: Staples RC, Toenniessen GH (eds) Salinity tolerance in plants: strategies for crop improvement. Wiley, New York, pp 155–159Google Scholar
  22. Law MY, Charles SA, Halliwelll B (1983) Glutathione and ascorbic acid in spinach (Spinach oleracea) chloroplasts. The effect of hydrogen peroxide and paraquat. Biochem J 210:899–903PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Lutts S, Kinet JM, Bouharmont J (1996) NaCl-induced senescence in leaves of rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars differing in salinity resistance. Ann Bot 78:389–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mallik S, Nayak M, Sahu AK, Shaw BP (2011) Response of antioxidant enzymes to high NaCl concentration in different salt tolerant plants. Biol Plant 55:191–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mittler R (2002) Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci 7:405–410CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Noctor G, Foyer C (1998) Ascorbate and glutathione: keeping active oxygen under control. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 49:249–279CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Parida AK, Das AB (2005) Salt tolerance and salinity effect of plants: a review. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 60:324–349CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Porcel R, Aroca R, Ruı´z-Lozano JM (2012) Salinity stress alleviation using arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 32:181–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sairam RK (1994) Effects of homobrassinolide application on plant metabolism and grain yield under irrigated and moisture stress conditions of two wheat varieties. Plant Growth Regul 14:173–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sairam RK, Tyagi A (2004) Physiological and molecular biology of salinity stress tolerance in plants. Curr Sci 86:407–420Google Scholar
  31. Schenck zu Schweinsberg-Mickan M, Müller T, (2009) Impact of effective microorganisms and other biofertilizers on soil microbial characteristics, organic-matter decomposition, and plant growth. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 172:704–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sheng M, Tang M, Chen H, Yang BW, Zhang FF, Huang YH (2008) Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizae on photosynthesis and water status of maize plants under salt stress. Mycorrhiza 18:287–296CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Smith LK, Vierheller TL, Thorne CA (1988) Assay of glutathione reductase in crude tissue homogenates using 5,5-thiobis (2-nitrobenzoic acid). Anal Biochem 175:408–413CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1980) Statistical methods, 7th edn. Iowa State University Press, Ames IowaGoogle Scholar
  35. Szabados L, Savoure´ A (2009) Proline: a multifunctional amino acid. Trends Plant Sci 15:89–97CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Talaat NB, Shawky BT (2013) 24-Epibrassinolide alleviates salt-induced inhibition of productivity by increasing nutrients and compatible solutes accumulation and enhancing antioxidant system in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Acta Physiol Plant 35:729–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Talaat NB, Shawky BT (2014a) Protective effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) plants exposed to salinity. Environ Exp Bot 98:20–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Talaat NB, Shawky BT (2014b) Modulation of the ROS-scavenging system in salt-stressed wheat plants inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 177:199–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Thompson JE, Froese CD, Madey E, Smith MD, Hong Y (1988) Lipid metabolism during plant senescence. Prog Lipid Res 37:119–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tsuda T, Shiga K, Ohshima K, Kawakishi S, Osawa T (1996) Inhibition of lipid peroxidation and the active oxygen radical scavenging effect of anthocyanin pigments isolated from Phaseolus vulgaris L. Biochem Pharmacol 52:1033–1039CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Yang X, Liang Z, Wen X, Lu C (2008) Genetic engineering of the biosynthesis of glycinebetaine leads to increased tolerance of photosynthesis to salt stress in transgenic tobacco plants. Plant Mol Biol 66:73–86CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Yildiz-Aktas L, Dagnon S, Gurel A, Gesheva E, Edreva A (2009) Drought tolerance in cotton: involvement of non-enzymatic ROS scavenging compounds. J Agron Crop Sci 195:247–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Plant Physiology, Faculty of AgricultureCairo UniversityGizaEgypt

Personalised recommendations