Journal of Plant Growth Regulation

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 131–142 | Cite as

Rapid Kinetic Analysis of Ethylene Growth Responses in Seedlings: New Insights into Ethylene Signal Transduction

Article

Abstract

Ethylene is a phytohormone that influences diverse processes in plants. Ethylene causes various changes in etiolated seedlings that differ between species and include reduced growth of shoots and roots, increased diameter of shoots, agravitropic growth, initiation of root hairs, and increased curvature of the apical hook. The inhibition of growth in etiolated seedlings has become widely used to screen for and identify mutants. This approach has led to an increased understanding of ethylene signaling. Most studies use end-point analysis after several days of exposure to assess the effects of ethylene. Recently, the use of time-lapse imaging has re-emerged as an experimental method to study the rapid kinetics of ethylene responses. This review outlines the historical use of ethylene growth kinetic studies and summarizes the recent use of this approach coupled with molecular biology to provide new insights into ethylene signaling.

Keywords

Ethylene Growth kinetics Signal transduction Time-lapse imaging Receptors 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abeles FB, Morgan PW, Saltveit ME Jr. 1992. Ethylene in Plant Biology, 2nd ed. San Diego, CA, USA, Academic Press, p 414Google Scholar
  2. Alonso JM, Hirayama T, Roman G, Nourizadeh S, Ecker Jr. 1999. EIN2, a bifunctional transducer of ethylene and stress responses in Arabidopsis. Science 284:2148–2152Google Scholar
  3. Alonso JM, Stepanova AN, Solano R, Wisman E, Ferrari S, et al. 2003. Five components of the ethylene-response pathway identified in a screen of weak ethylene-insensitive mutants in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:2992–2997PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berg AR, Peacock K. 1991. Growth patterns in nutating and nonnutating sunflower (Helianthus annuus) hypocotyls. Am J Bot 79:77–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Binder BM, Bleecker AB. 2003. A model for ethylene receptor function and 1-methylcyclopropene action. ACTA Hort 628:177–187Google Scholar
  6. Binder BM, Mortimore LA, Stepanova AN, Ecker JR, Bleecker AB. 2004a. Short term growth responses to ethylene in Arabidopsis seedlings are EIN3 /EIL1 independent. Plant Physiol 136:2921–2927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Binder BM, O’Malley RC, Wang W, Moore JM, Parks BM, et al. 2004b. Arabidopsis seedling growth response and recovery to ethylene: a kinetic analysis. Plant Physiol 136:2913–2920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Binder BM, O’Malley RC, Wang W, Zutz TC, Bleecker AB. 2006. Ethylene stimulates mutations that are dependent on the ETR1 receptor. Plant Physiol 142:1690–1700PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blankenship SM, Dole JM. 2003. 1-Methylcyclopropene: a review. Postharvest Bio Tech 28:1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bleecker AB, Estelle MA, Somerville C, Kende H. 1988. Insensitivity to ethylene conferred by a dominant mutation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 241:1086–1089CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Bray D, Levin MD, Morton-Firth CJ. 1998. Receptor clustering as a cellular mechanism to control sensitivity. Nature 393:85–88PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burg SP. 1973. Ethylene in plant growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 70:591–597PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chang C, Kwok SF, Bleecker AB, Meyerowitz EM. 1993. Arabidopsis ethylene-response gene etr1: similarity of product to two-component regulators. Science 262:539–543PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chao Q, Rothenberg M, Solano R, Roman G, Terzaghi W, et al. 1997. Activation of the ethylene gas response pathway in Arabidopsis by the nuclear protein ETHYLENE-INSENSITIVE3 and related proteins. Cell 89:1133–1144PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chen QC, Bleecker AB. 1995. Analysis of ethylene signal-transduction kinetics associated with seedling-growth response and chitinase induction in wild-type and mutant Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 108:597–607PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Darwin C, Darwin F. 1880. The Power of Movement in Plants. London, UK, John Murray, p 592Google Scholar
  17. De Grauwe L, Vandenbussche F, Tietz O, Palme K, Van Der Straeten D. 2005. Auxin, ethylene and brassinosteroids: tripartite control of growth in Arabidopsis hypocotyl. Plant Cell Physiol 46:827–836PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Duke TAJ, Bray D. 1999. Heightened sensitivity of a lattice of membrane receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:10104–0108PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eisinger W, Croner LJ, Taiz L. 1983. Ethylene-induced lateral expansion in etiolated pea stems. Plant Physiol 73:407–412PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Folta KM, Pontin MA, Karlin-Neumann G, Bottini R, Spalding EP. 2003. Genomic and physiological studies of early cryptochrome 1 action demonstrate roles for auxin and gibberellin in the control of hypocotyl growth by blue light. Plant J 36:203–214PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Folta KM, Spalding EP. 2001. Unexpected roles for cryptochrome 2 and phototropin revealed by high-resolution analysis of blue light-mediated hypocotyl growth inhibition. Plant J 26:471–478PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gagne JM, Smalle J, Gingerich DJ, Walker JM, Yoo S-D, et al. 2004. Arabidopsis EIN3-binding F-box 1 and 2 form ubiquitin-protein ligases that repress ethylene action and promote growth by directing EIN3 degradation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:6803–6808PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gamble RL, Coonfield ML, Schaller GE. 1998. Histidine kinase activity of the ETR1 ethylene receptor from Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:7825–7829PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gamble RL, Qu X., Schaller GE. 2002. Mutational analysis for the ethylene receptor ETR1. Role of the histidine kinase domain in dominant ethylene insensitivity. Plant Physiol 128:1428–438PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gao Z, Chen Y-F, Randlett MD, Zhao X-C, Findell JL, et al. 2003. Localization of the Raf-like kinase CTR1 to the endoplasmic reticulum of Arabidopsis through participation in ethylene receptor signaling complexes. J Biol Chem 278:34725–34732PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Goeschl JD, Kays SJ. 1975. Concentration dependencies of some effects of ethylene on etiolated pea, peanut, bean, and cotton seedlings. Plant Physiol 55:670–677PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Guo H, Ecker JR. 2003. Plant responses to ethylene gas are mediated by SCFEBF1/EFB2-dependent proteolysis of EIN3 transcription factor. Cell 115:667–677PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Guzmán P, Ecker JR. 1990. Exploiting the triple response of Arabidopsis to identify ethylene-related mutants. Plant Cell 2:513–523PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hall AE, Bleecker AB. 2003. Analysis of combinatorial loss-of-function mutants in the Arabidopsis ethylene receptors reveals that the ers1;etr1 double mutant has severe developmental defects that are EIN2 dependent. Plant Cell 15:2032–2041PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hall AE, Chen QG, Findell JL, Schaller GE, Bleecker AB. 1999. The relationship between ethylene binding and dominant insensitivity conferred by mutant forms of the ETR1 ethylene receptor. Plant Physiol 121:291–299PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hall AE, Findell JL, Schaller GE, Sisler EC, Bleecker AB. 2000. Ethylene perception by the ERS1 protein in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 123:1449–1457PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Heisenberg W. 1958. In Physics and Philosophy, Chapter III. The Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Theory. New York, NY, USA, Harper and Brothers. p. 58Google Scholar
  33. Hua J, Chang C, Sun Q, Meyerowitz EM. 1995. Ethylene insensitivity conferred by Arabidopsis ERS gene. Science 269:1712–1714PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hua J, Meyerowitz EM. 1998. Ethylene responses are negatively regulated by a receptor gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Cell 94:261–271PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hua J, Sakai H, Nourizadeh S, Chen QG, Bleecker AB, et al. 1998. EIN4 and ERS2 are members of the putative ethylene receptor gene family in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 10:1321–1332PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Huang Y, Li H, Hutchison CE, Laskey J, Kieber JJ. 2003. Biochemical and functional analysis of CTR1, a protein kinase that negatively regulates ethylene signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant J 33:221–233PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jackson MB. 1983. Regulation of root growth and morphology by ethylene and other externally applied growth substances. In Jackson MB, Stead AD, editors. Growth Regulators in Root Development. Monograph No. 10, British Plant Growth Regulator Group, London, UK, p 103–116Google Scholar
  38. Kieber JJ, Rothenberg M, Roman G, Feldmann KA, Ecker JR. 1993. CTR1, a negative regulator of the ethylene response pathway in Arabidopsis, encodes a member of the Raf family of protein kinases. Cell 72:427–441PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Klee H. 2004. Ethylene signal transduction: moving beyond Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 135:660–667PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Larsen PB, Chang C. 2001. The Arabidopsis eer1 mutant has enhanced ethylene responses in the hypocotyl and stem. Plant Physiol 125:1061–1073PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lee JS, Chang W-K, Evans ML. 1990. Effects of ethylene on the kinetics of curvature and auxin redistribution in gravistiumulated roots of Zea mays. Plant Physiol 94:1770–1775PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Li H, Johnson P, Stepanova A, Alonso JM, Ecker JR. 2004. Convergence of signaling pathways in the control of differential cell growth in Arabidopsis. Dev Cell 7:193–204PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mattoo AK, Suttle JC, eds. 1991. The Plant Hormone Ethylene. Boca Raton, FL, USA, CRC Press, p 337Google Scholar
  44. Michener HD. 1938. The action of ethylene on plant growth. Am J Bot 25:711–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Moussatche P, Klee H. 2004. Autophosphorylation activity of the Arabidopsis ethylene receptor multigene family. J Biol Chem 279:48734–48741PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nee M., Chiu L, Eisinger W. 1978. Induction of swelling in pea internode tissue by ethylene. Plant Physiol 62:902–906PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Neljubov D. 1901. Uber die horizontale Nutation der Stengel von Pisum sativum und einiger Anderer. Pflanzen Beih Bot Zentralb 10:128–139Google Scholar
  48. Olmedo G, Guo H, Gregory BD, Nourizadeh SD, Aguilar-Henonin L, et al. 2006. ETHYLENE-INSENSITIVE5 encodes a 5′ → 3′ exoribonuclease required for regulation of the EIN3-targeting F-box proteins EBF1/2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:13286–13293PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. O’Malley RC, Rodriguez FI, Esch JJ, Binder BM, O’Donnell P. 2005. Ethylene-binding activity, gene-expression levels, and receptor-system output for ethylene-receptor family members from Arabidopsis and tomato. Plant J 41:651–659PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Parks BM, Cho MH, Spalding EP. 1998. Two genetically separable phases of growth inhibition induced by blue light in Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant Physiol 118:609–615PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Parks BM, Spalding EP. 1999. Sequential and coordinated action of phytochromes A and B during Arabidopsis stem growth revealed by kinetic analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:14142–14146PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Potuschak T, Lechner E, Parmentier Y, Yanagisawa S, Grava S, et al. 2003. EIN3-dependent regulation of plant ethylene hormone signaling by two Arabidopsis F Box proteins: EBF1 and EBF2. Cell 115:679–689PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Potuschak T, Vansiri A, Binder BM, Lechner E, Vierstra RD, 2006. The exonuclease XRN4 is a component of the ethylene response pathway in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 18:3047–3057PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Qu X, Schaller GE. 2004. Requirement of the histidine kinase domain for signal transduction by the ethylene receptor ETR1. Plant Physiol 136:2961–2970PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rauser WE, Horton RF. 1975. Rapid effects of indoleacetic acid and ethylene on the growth of intact pea roots. Plant Physiol 55:443–447PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sakai H, Hua J, Chen QG, Chang C, Medrano LJ, et al. 1998. ETR2 is an ETR1-like gene involved in ethylene signaling in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:5812–5817PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sanders IO, Harpham NVJ, Raskin I, Smith AR, Hall MA. 1991. Ethylene binding in wild type and mutant Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Ann Bot 68:97–103Google Scholar
  58. Schaller GE, Bleecker AB. 1995. Ethylene-binding sites generated in yeast expressing the Arabidopsis ETR1 gene. Science 270:1809–1811PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Shimizu TS, Aksenov SV, Bray D. 2003. A spatially extended stochastic model of the bacterial chemotaxis signaling pathway. J Mol Biol 329:291–309PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Thomason PA, Wolanin PM, Stock JB. 2002. Signal transduction: receptor clusters as information processing arrays. Curr Biol 12:339–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. van der Laan PA. 1934. Der Einfluss von Aethylen auf die Wuchsstoffbildung be avena und Vicia. Rec Trav Bot Neerl 31:691–742Google Scholar
  62. Wang W, Hall AE, O’Malley R, Bleecker AB. 2003. Canonical histidine kinase activity of the transmitter domain of the ETR1 ethylene receptor from Arabidopsis is not required for signal transmission. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:352–357PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Warner HL, Leopold AC. 1971. Timing of growth regulator responses in peas. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 44:989–994PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. West AH, Stock AM. 2001. Histidine kinases and response regulator proteins in two-component signaling systems. Trends Biol Sci 26:369–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Yanagisawa S, Yoo S-D, Sheen J. 2003. Differential regulation of EIN3 stability by glucose and ethylene signaling in plants. Nature 425:521–525PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zhao XC, Qu X, Mathews DE, Schaller GE. 2002. Effect of ethylene pathway mutations upon expression of the ethylene receptor ETR1 from Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 130:1983–1991PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of HorticultureUniversity of WisconsinMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations