Skip to main content
Log in

Extrapolation of upwelling irradiance just beneath the ocean surface from the in-water radiometric profile measurements

  • Published:
Journal of Oceanology and Limnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Accurate measurements of upwelling irradiance just beneath the ocean surface, Eu(λ, 0), can be used to calculate ocean optical parameters, and further develop retrieval algorithms for remotely sensing water component concentrations. Due to the effects of sea surface waves, perturbation from instrument platform (ship), and instrument self-shading, Eu(λ, 0) is often difficult to be accurately measured. This study presents a procedure for extrapolating the Eu(λ, 0) from the in-water radiometric profile measurements. Using the optical profile data from 13 bands (ranging from 381 to 779 nm) measured by 45 casts in the Ligurian Sea during 2003–2009, the Eu(λ, 0) was extrapolated from in-water upwelling irradiance measurements between the initial shallow depth, Z0, and an optimal bottom depth, Z1, by three linear models (linear, 2-degree polynomial, and exponential) and two nonlinear models (LOESS and spline). The accumulated errors of extrapolated Eu(λ, 0) at each wavelength for the five models were calculated. It was found that the optimal Z1 depth for the linear and exponential models was at the depth of 80% of Eu(λ, Z0), 50% of Eu(λ, Z0) for the 2-degree polynomial model, 40% of Eu(λ, Z0) for the LOESS model, and 15% of Eu(λ, Z0) for the spline model. The extrapolated Eu(λ, 0) derived from the five models was in good agreement with the calculated true Eu(λ, 0). In all bands, the 2-degree polynomial model achieved the highest accuracy, followed by the LOESS model. In the short band of 381–559 nm, the linear and exponential models had the third-best performance, and the spline model performed worst within this range. For the red band of 619–779 nm, the accuracies of the exponential and spline models had the third highest performance, and the linear model produced lowest accuracy. Hence, the 2-degree polynomial model was an optimal procedure for extrapolation of Eu(λ, 0) from the in-water radiometric profile measurements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Albert A, Mobley C D. 2003. An analytical model for subsurface irradiance and remote sensing reflectance in deep and shallow case-2 waters. Optics Express, 11(22): 2873–2890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antoine D, Chami M, Claustre H et al. 2006. BOUSSOLE: A Joint CNRS-INSU, ESA, CNES, and NASA Ocean Color Calibration and Validation Activity. NASA/TM-2006-214147, NASA, Greenbelt.

  • Antoine D, d’Ortenzio F, Hooker S B et al. 2008a. Assessment of uncertainty in the ocean reflectance determined by three satellite ocean color sensors (MERIS, SeaWiFS and MODIS-A) at an offshore site in the Mediterranean Sea (BOUSSOLE project). Journal of Geophysical Research, 113(C7): C07013, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JC004472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antoine D, Guevel P, Desté J F et al. 2008b. The ”BOUSSOLE“ Buoy—a new transparent-to-swell taut mooring dedicated to marine optics: design, tests, and performance at sea. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 25(6): 968–989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bialek A, Vellucci V, Gentil B et al. 2020. Monte Carlo-based quantification of uncertainties in determining ocean remote sensing reflectance from underwater fixed-depth radiometry measurements. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 37(2): 177–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark D K, Yarbrough M A, Feinholz M et al. 2003. MOBY, a radiometric buoy for performance monitoring and vicarious calibration of satellite ocean color sensors: measurement and data analysis protocols. In: Mueller J L, Fargion G S, McClain C R eds. Ocean Optics Protocols for Satellite Ocean Color Sensor Validation, Revision 4, Volume VI: Special Topics in Ocean Optics Protocols and Appendices. NASA, Greenbelt. p.138–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Alimonte D, Shybanov E B, Zibordi G et al. 2013. Regression of in-water radiometric profile data. Optics Express, 21(23): 27707–27733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dierssen H, Smith R C. 1997. Estimation of irradiance just below the air-water interface. In: Proceedings of SPIE 2963, Ocean Optics XIII. SPIE, Halifax. p.204–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon H R. 1985. Ship perturbation of irradiance measurements at sea. 1: Monte Carlo simulations. Applied Optics, 24(23): 4172–4182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon H R. 2005. Normalized water-leaving radiance: revisiting the influence of surface roughness. Applied Optics, 44(2): 241–248, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.44.000241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon H R, Ding R. 1992. Self-shading of in-water optical instruments. Limnology and Oceanography, 37(3): 491–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregg W W, Carder K L. 1990. A simple spectral solar irradiance model for cloudless maritime atmospheres. Limnology and Oceanography, 35(8): 1657–1675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He S Y, He M X, Fischer J. 2015. Performance evaluation of operational atmospheric correction algorithms over the East China Seas. Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 35(1): 1–22, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-016-5170-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hieronymi M, Macke A. 2012. On the influence of wind and waves on underwater irradiance fluctuations. Ocean Science, 8(4): 455–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooker S B, Maritorena S. 2000. An evaluation of oceanographic radiometers and deployment methodologies. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 17(6): 811–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirk J T O. 1991. Volume scattering function, average cosines, and the underwater light field. Limnology and Oceanography, 36(3): 455–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leathers R A, Downes T V, Mobley C D. 2001. Self-shading correction for upwelling sea-surface radiance measurements made with buoyed instruments. Optics Express, 8(10): 561–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee Z P, Du K P, Arnone R. 2005. A model for the diffuse attenuation coefficient of downwelling irradiance. Journal of Geophysical Research, 110(C2): C02016, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JC002573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li L H, Stramski D, Darecki M. 2018. Characterization of the light field and apparent optical properties in the ocean euphotic layer based on hyperspectral measurements of irradiance quartet. Applied Sciences, 8(12): 2677, https://doi.org/10.3390/app8122677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li L H, Stramski D, Reynolds R A. 2016. Effects of inelastic radiative processes on the determination of water-leaving spectral radiance from extrapolation of underwater near-surface measurements. Applied Optics, 55(25): 7050–7067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liou K N. 2002. An Introduction to Atmospheric Radiation. 2nd edn. Academic Press, Amsterdam. p.27–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma R H, Jiang G J, Duan H T et al. 2011. Effective upwelling irradiance depths in turbid waters: a spectral analysis of origins and fate. Optics Express, 19(8): 7127–7138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morel A, Maritorena S. 2001. Bio-optical properties of oceanic waters: a reappraisal. Journal of Geophysical Research, 106(C4): 7163–7180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morel A, Prieur L. 1977. Analysis of variations in ocean color. Limnology and Oceanography, 22(4): 709–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piskozub J. 2004a. Effect of ship shadow on in-water irradiance measurements. Oceanologia, 46(1): 103–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piskozub J. 2004b. Effect of 3-D instrument casing shape on the self-shading of in-water upwelling irradiance. Optics Express, 12(14): 3144–3148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piskozub J, Weeks A R, Schwarz J N et al. 2000. Self-shading of upwelling irradiance for an instrument with sensors on a sidearm. Applied Optics, 39(12): 1872–1878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pope R M, Fry E S. 1997. Absorption spectrum (380–700 nm) of pure water. II. Integrating cavity measurements. Applied Optics, 36(33): 8710–8723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saruya Y, Oishi T, Kishino M et al. 1997. Influence of ship shadow on underwater irradiance fields. In: Proceedings of SPIE 2963, Ocean Optics XIII. SPIE, Halifax, https://doi.org/10.1117/12.266397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sathyendranath S, Prieur L, Morel A. 1989. A three-component model of ocean colour and its application to remote sensing of phytoplankton pigments in coastal waters. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 10(8): 1373–1394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith R C, Baker K S. 1981. Optical properties of the clearest natural waters (200–800 nm). Applied Optics, 20(2): 177–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sogandares F M, Fry E S. 1997. Absorption spectrum (340–640 nm) of pure water. I. Photothermal measurements. Applied Optics, 36(33): 8699–8709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Heukelem L, Thomas C S. 2001. Computer-assisted highperformance liquid chromatography method development with applications to the isolation and analysis of phytoplankton pigments. Journal of Chromatography A, 910(1): 31–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voss K J, Gordon H R, Flora S et al. 2017. A method to extrapolate the diffuse upwelling radiance attenuation coefficient to the surface as applied to the Marine Optical Buoy (MOBY). Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 34(7): 1423–1432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wijesekera H W, Pegau W S, Boyd T J. 2005. Effect of surface waves on the irradiance distribution in the upper ocean. Optics Express, 13(23): 9257–9264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang X P, Sokoletsky L, Wei X D et al. 2017. Suspended sediment concentration mapping based on the MODIS satellite imagery in the East China inland, estuarine, and coastal waters. Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 35(1): 39–60, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-016-5060-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye H P, Zhang B, Liao X H et al. 2019. Gaussian decomposition and component pigment spectral analysis of phytoplankton absorption spectra. Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 37(5): 1542–1554, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-019-8079-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaneveld J R V, Boss E, Barnard A. 2001. Influence of surface waves on measured and modeled irradiance profiles. Applied Optics, 40(9): 1442–1449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zibordi G, Ferrari G M. 1995. Instrument self-shading in underwater optical measurements: experimental data. Applied Optics, 34(15): 2750–2754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was partly done in Laboratoire d’Océanographie de Villefranche, CNRS-Université Pierre et Marie Curie, France. The author is very grateful to Prof. David Antoine for his support and help and the data were acquired from his BOUSSOLE project. Special thanks to Dr. Kirsten Noltie in Queen’s University for polishing English of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shaoqi Gong.

Additional information

Supported by the Marine Special Program of Jiangsu Province in China (No. JSZRHYKJ202007) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 40801145)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gong, S. Extrapolation of upwelling irradiance just beneath the ocean surface from the in-water radiometric profile measurements. J. Ocean. Limnol. 41, 1694–1705 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-022-2201-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-022-2201-3

Keyword

Navigation