Abstract
Accurate measurements of upwelling irradiance just beneath the ocean surface, Eu(λ, 0−), can be used to calculate ocean optical parameters, and further develop retrieval algorithms for remotely sensing water component concentrations. Due to the effects of sea surface waves, perturbation from instrument platform (ship), and instrument self-shading, Eu(λ, 0−) is often difficult to be accurately measured. This study presents a procedure for extrapolating the Eu(λ, 0−) from the in-water radiometric profile measurements. Using the optical profile data from 13 bands (ranging from 381 to 779 nm) measured by 45 casts in the Ligurian Sea during 2003–2009, the Eu(λ, 0−) was extrapolated from in-water upwelling irradiance measurements between the initial shallow depth, Z0, and an optimal bottom depth, Z1, by three linear models (linear, 2-degree polynomial, and exponential) and two nonlinear models (LOESS and spline). The accumulated errors of extrapolated Eu(λ, 0−) at each wavelength for the five models were calculated. It was found that the optimal Z1 depth for the linear and exponential models was at the depth of 80% of Eu(λ, Z0), 50% of Eu(λ, Z0) for the 2-degree polynomial model, 40% of Eu(λ, Z0) for the LOESS model, and 15% of Eu(λ, Z0) for the spline model. The extrapolated Eu(λ, 0−) derived from the five models was in good agreement with the calculated true Eu(λ, 0−). In all bands, the 2-degree polynomial model achieved the highest accuracy, followed by the LOESS model. In the short band of 381–559 nm, the linear and exponential models had the third-best performance, and the spline model performed worst within this range. For the red band of 619–779 nm, the accuracies of the exponential and spline models had the third highest performance, and the linear model produced lowest accuracy. Hence, the 2-degree polynomial model was an optimal procedure for extrapolation of Eu(λ, 0−) from the in-water radiometric profile measurements.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Albert A, Mobley C D. 2003. An analytical model for subsurface irradiance and remote sensing reflectance in deep and shallow case-2 waters. Optics Express, 11(22): 2873–2890.
Antoine D, Chami M, Claustre H et al. 2006. BOUSSOLE: A Joint CNRS-INSU, ESA, CNES, and NASA Ocean Color Calibration and Validation Activity. NASA/TM-2006-214147, NASA, Greenbelt.
Antoine D, d’Ortenzio F, Hooker S B et al. 2008a. Assessment of uncertainty in the ocean reflectance determined by three satellite ocean color sensors (MERIS, SeaWiFS and MODIS-A) at an offshore site in the Mediterranean Sea (BOUSSOLE project). Journal of Geophysical Research, 113(C7): C07013, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JC004472.
Antoine D, Guevel P, Desté J F et al. 2008b. The ”BOUSSOLE“ Buoy—a new transparent-to-swell taut mooring dedicated to marine optics: design, tests, and performance at sea. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 25(6): 968–989.
Bialek A, Vellucci V, Gentil B et al. 2020. Monte Carlo-based quantification of uncertainties in determining ocean remote sensing reflectance from underwater fixed-depth radiometry measurements. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 37(2): 177–196.
Clark D K, Yarbrough M A, Feinholz M et al. 2003. MOBY, a radiometric buoy for performance monitoring and vicarious calibration of satellite ocean color sensors: measurement and data analysis protocols. In: Mueller J L, Fargion G S, McClain C R eds. Ocean Optics Protocols for Satellite Ocean Color Sensor Validation, Revision 4, Volume VI: Special Topics in Ocean Optics Protocols and Appendices. NASA, Greenbelt. p.138–170.
D’Alimonte D, Shybanov E B, Zibordi G et al. 2013. Regression of in-water radiometric profile data. Optics Express, 21(23): 27707–27733.
Dierssen H, Smith R C. 1997. Estimation of irradiance just below the air-water interface. In: Proceedings of SPIE 2963, Ocean Optics XIII. SPIE, Halifax. p.204–230.
Gordon H R. 1985. Ship perturbation of irradiance measurements at sea. 1: Monte Carlo simulations. Applied Optics, 24(23): 4172–4182.
Gordon H R. 2005. Normalized water-leaving radiance: revisiting the influence of surface roughness. Applied Optics, 44(2): 241–248, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.44.000241.
Gordon H R, Ding R. 1992. Self-shading of in-water optical instruments. Limnology and Oceanography, 37(3): 491–500.
Gregg W W, Carder K L. 1990. A simple spectral solar irradiance model for cloudless maritime atmospheres. Limnology and Oceanography, 35(8): 1657–1675.
He S Y, He M X, Fischer J. 2015. Performance evaluation of operational atmospheric correction algorithms over the East China Seas. Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 35(1): 1–22, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-016-5170-6
Hieronymi M, Macke A. 2012. On the influence of wind and waves on underwater irradiance fluctuations. Ocean Science, 8(4): 455–471.
Hooker S B, Maritorena S. 2000. An evaluation of oceanographic radiometers and deployment methodologies. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 17(6): 811–830.
Kirk J T O. 1991. Volume scattering function, average cosines, and the underwater light field. Limnology and Oceanography, 36(3): 455–467.
Leathers R A, Downes T V, Mobley C D. 2001. Self-shading correction for upwelling sea-surface radiance measurements made with buoyed instruments. Optics Express, 8(10): 561–570.
Lee Z P, Du K P, Arnone R. 2005. A model for the diffuse attenuation coefficient of downwelling irradiance. Journal of Geophysical Research, 110(C2): C02016, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JC002573.
Li L H, Stramski D, Darecki M. 2018. Characterization of the light field and apparent optical properties in the ocean euphotic layer based on hyperspectral measurements of irradiance quartet. Applied Sciences, 8(12): 2677, https://doi.org/10.3390/app8122677.
Li L H, Stramski D, Reynolds R A. 2016. Effects of inelastic radiative processes on the determination of water-leaving spectral radiance from extrapolation of underwater near-surface measurements. Applied Optics, 55(25): 7050–7067.
Liou K N. 2002. An Introduction to Atmospheric Radiation. 2nd edn. Academic Press, Amsterdam. p.27–34.
Ma R H, Jiang G J, Duan H T et al. 2011. Effective upwelling irradiance depths in turbid waters: a spectral analysis of origins and fate. Optics Express, 19(8): 7127–7138.
Morel A, Maritorena S. 2001. Bio-optical properties of oceanic waters: a reappraisal. Journal of Geophysical Research, 106(C4): 7163–7180.
Morel A, Prieur L. 1977. Analysis of variations in ocean color. Limnology and Oceanography, 22(4): 709–722.
Piskozub J. 2004a. Effect of ship shadow on in-water irradiance measurements. Oceanologia, 46(1): 103–112.
Piskozub J. 2004b. Effect of 3-D instrument casing shape on the self-shading of in-water upwelling irradiance. Optics Express, 12(14): 3144–3148.
Piskozub J, Weeks A R, Schwarz J N et al. 2000. Self-shading of upwelling irradiance for an instrument with sensors on a sidearm. Applied Optics, 39(12): 1872–1878.
Pope R M, Fry E S. 1997. Absorption spectrum (380–700 nm) of pure water. II. Integrating cavity measurements. Applied Optics, 36(33): 8710–8723.
Saruya Y, Oishi T, Kishino M et al. 1997. Influence of ship shadow on underwater irradiance fields. In: Proceedings of SPIE 2963, Ocean Optics XIII. SPIE, Halifax, https://doi.org/10.1117/12.266397.
Sathyendranath S, Prieur L, Morel A. 1989. A three-component model of ocean colour and its application to remote sensing of phytoplankton pigments in coastal waters. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 10(8): 1373–1394.
Smith R C, Baker K S. 1981. Optical properties of the clearest natural waters (200–800 nm). Applied Optics, 20(2): 177–184.
Sogandares F M, Fry E S. 1997. Absorption spectrum (340–640 nm) of pure water. I. Photothermal measurements. Applied Optics, 36(33): 8699–8709.
van Heukelem L, Thomas C S. 2001. Computer-assisted highperformance liquid chromatography method development with applications to the isolation and analysis of phytoplankton pigments. Journal of Chromatography A, 910(1): 31–49.
Voss K J, Gordon H R, Flora S et al. 2017. A method to extrapolate the diffuse upwelling radiance attenuation coefficient to the surface as applied to the Marine Optical Buoy (MOBY). Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 34(7): 1423–1432.
Wijesekera H W, Pegau W S, Boyd T J. 2005. Effect of surface waves on the irradiance distribution in the upper ocean. Optics Express, 13(23): 9257–9264.
Yang X P, Sokoletsky L, Wei X D et al. 2017. Suspended sediment concentration mapping based on the MODIS satellite imagery in the East China inland, estuarine, and coastal waters. Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 35(1): 39–60, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-016-5060-y.
Ye H P, Zhang B, Liao X H et al. 2019. Gaussian decomposition and component pigment spectral analysis of phytoplankton absorption spectra. Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 37(5): 1542–1554, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-019-8079-z.
Zaneveld J R V, Boss E, Barnard A. 2001. Influence of surface waves on measured and modeled irradiance profiles. Applied Optics, 40(9): 1442–1449.
Zibordi G, Ferrari G M. 1995. Instrument self-shading in underwater optical measurements: experimental data. Applied Optics, 34(15): 2750–2754.
Acknowledgment
This work was partly done in Laboratoire d’Océanographie de Villefranche, CNRS-Université Pierre et Marie Curie, France. The author is very grateful to Prof. David Antoine for his support and help and the data were acquired from his BOUSSOLE project. Special thanks to Dr. Kirsten Noltie in Queen’s University for polishing English of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Supported by the Marine Special Program of Jiangsu Province in China (No. JSZRHYKJ202007) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 40801145)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gong, S. Extrapolation of upwelling irradiance just beneath the ocean surface from the in-water radiometric profile measurements. J. Ocean. Limnol. 41, 1694–1705 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-022-2201-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-022-2201-3