Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of two sampling methods when studying periphyton colonization in Lam Tsuen River, Hong Kong, China

  • Biology
  • Published:
Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We used standard periphyton samplers to examine the colonization pattern of periphytic algae on artificial substrates (glass slides) in Lam Tsuen River, Hong Kong, in dry (winter) and wet (summer) seasons. In each season, six replicated slides were retrieved randomly and replaced by new slides at weekly intervals over a period of 6 weeks. We thus obtained two batches of slides, both with a series of different exposure times (1 to 6 weeks): one batch was set up at the same time (start of the sampling) and the other was harvested at the same time (end of the sampling). Changes in taxonomic composition, species diversity (Shannon-Wiener diversity index), standing crop (in terms of cell density and cell biovolume), and abundance of the abundant algal species were monitored and compared between the two batches of slides. The succession patterns of the periphytic algae were similar between the two batches in each season, while more remarkable differences were observed between the two seasons, suggesting that either batch would be suitable for a colonization study of periphytic algae. The cell density was dominated by diatoms in both seasons, while the cell biovolume was dominated by diatoms in winter and by green algae in summer. The cell density and biovolume attributed to blue green algae was relatively small. Most of the diatom species exhibited similar colonization patterns throughout the experiment, while green algae showed different succession patterns in different seasons or sampling methods, indicating that diatoms are better bio-indicators than green algae for a periphyton colonization study. In general, the diversity indices and the standing crops reached their maximums at around week 4, and they were higher in summer than in winter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ács E, Kiss KT. 1993. Colonization processes of diatoms on artificial substrates in the River Danube near Budapest (Hungary). Hydrobiologia, 269/270: 307–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Public Health Association, APHA (Editors), 1995. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 19th ed. Public Health Association, Washington D.C. USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asaeda T, Son D H. 2000. Spatial structure and populations of a periphyton community: a model and verification. Ecol. Model. 133: 195–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asaeda T, Son D H. 2001. A model of the development of a periphyton community: resource and flow dynamics. Ecol. Model., 137: 61–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blinn D W, Fredericksen A, Korte V. 1980. Colonization rates and community structure of diatoms on three different rock substrata in a lotic system. Brit. Phycol. J., 15: 303–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danilov A D, Ekelund N G A. 2001. Comparison of usefulness of three types of artificial substrata (glass, wood and plastic) when studying settlement patterns of periphyton in lakes of different trophic status. J. Microbiol. Methods, 45: 167–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost P C, Cherrier C T, Larson J H, Bridgham S D, Lamberti G A. 2007. Effects of dissolved organic matter and ultraviolet radiation on the accrual, stoichiometry and algal taxonomy of stream periphyton. Freshwater Biol., 52: 319–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb A D, Richards J H, Gaiser E E. 2006. Comparative study of periphyton community structure in long and short-hydroperiod Everglades marshes. Hydrobiologia, 569: 195–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill B H, Herlihy A T, Kaufmann P R, DeCelles S J, Borgh M A V. 2003. Assessment of streams of the eastern United States using a periphyton index of biotic integrity. Ecol. Indicators, 2: 325–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillebrand H, Sommer U. 2000. Diversity of benthic microalgae in response to colonization time and eutrophication. Aquat. Bot., 67: 221–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodoki Y. 2005. Direct and indirect effects of solar ultraviolet radiation on attached bacteria and algae in lotic systems. Hydrobiologia, 549: 259–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horner R R, Welch E B, Seeley M R, Jacoby J M. 1990. Responses of periphyton to changes in current velocity, suspended sediment and phosphorus concentration. Freshwater Biol., 24: 215–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iwaniec D M, Childers D L, Rondeau D, Madden C J, Saunders C. 2006. Effects of hydrologic and water quality drivers on periphyton dynamics in the southern Everglades. Hydrobiologia, 569: 223–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komulaynen S. 2002. Use of phytoperiphyton to assess water quality in north-western Russian rivers. J. Appl. Phycol., 14: 57–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam P K S, Lei A P. 1999. Colonization of periphytic algae on artificial substrates in a tropical stream. Diatom Res., 14(2): 307–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leira M, Sabater, S., 2005. Diatom assemblages distribution in catalan rivers, NE Spain, in relation to chemical and physiographical factors. Water Res., 39: 73–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis M A, Weber D L, Moore J C. 2002. An evaluation of the use of colonized periphyton as an indicator of wastewater impact in near-coastal areas of the Gulf of Mexico. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 43: 11–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe R L, Guckert J B, Belanger S E, Davidson D H, Johnson D W. 1996. An evaluation of periphyton community structure and function on tile and cobble substrata in experimental stream mesocosms. Hydrobiologia, 328: 135–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe R L, Pan Y. 1996. Benthic algal communities as biological monitors. In: Stevenson R J, Bothwell M L, Lowe R L eds. Algal Ecology: Freshwater Benthic Ecosystems. Academic Press Inc., USA, pp. 705–739.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oemke M P, Burton T M. 1986. Diatom colonization dynamics in a lotic system. Hydrobiologia, 139: 153–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid M A, Tibby J C, Penny D, Gell P A. 1995. The use of diatoms to assess past and present water quality. Aust. J. Ecol., 20: 57–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Revelante N, Gilmartin M. 1980. Microplankton diversity indices as indicators of eutrophication in the Northern Adriatic Sea. Hydrobiologia, 70: 277–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rier S T, Stevenson R J. 2006. Response of periphytic algae to gradients in nitrogen and phosphorus in streamside mesocosms. Hydrobiologia, 561: 131–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabater S, Gregory S V, Sedell J R. 1998. Community dynamics and metabolism of benthic algae colonizing wood and rock substrata in a forest stream. J. Phycol., 34: 561–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiller D V, Marti E N, Riera J L, Sabater F. 2007. Effects of nutrients and light on periphyton biomass and nitrogen uptake in Mediterranean streams with contrasting land uses. Freshwater Biol., 52: 891–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siver P A. 1977. Comparison of attached diatom communities on natural and artificial substrates. J. Phycol., 13: 402–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson R J, Peterson C G. 1989. Variation in benthic diatom (Bacillariophyceae) immigration with habitat characteristics and cell morphology. J. Phycol., 25: 120–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber C I, McFarland B M. 1981. Effects of exposure time, season, substrate type and planktonic populations on the taxonomic composition of algal periphyton on artificial substrates in the Ohio and Little Miami Rivers, Ohio. In: Bates J M, Weber C I. eds. Ecological Assessments of Effluents Impacts on Communities of Indigenous Aquatic Organisms. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, USA. ASTM STP, 730: 166–219.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhangli Hu  (胡章立).

Additional information

Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 30770393; 30770340), the National Major Program of Science and Technology for Water Pollution Control and Restoration in China (Nos.2009ZX07423-003, 2009ZX07101-011), and the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China (No. 06301361)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lei, A., Lam, Ks.P. & Hu, Z. Comparison of two sampling methods when studying periphyton colonization in Lam Tsuen River, Hong Kong, China. Chin. J. Ocean. Limnol. 29, 141–149 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-011-9961-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-011-9961-5

Keyword

Navigation